<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Joiner responds to my question on texting as a recruitment medium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/06/harry_joiner_re.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/06/harry_joiner_re.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stroud</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/06/harry_joiner_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stroud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.co.uk/2006/06/harry_joiner_responds_to_my_question_on_texting_as_a_recruitment_medium.html#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm... you msy find the comments on this post very helpful: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/q5396&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/q5396&lt;/a&gt;

Here is a snippet...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/04/HNbancellphonespam_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/04/HNbancellphonespam_1.html&lt;/a&gt;

Basically what I understand this to mean is that the FCC has lumped in cell-phone spam along with the CAN SPAM Act. Now, keep in mind I don&#039;t condone spam of any kind, SMS or email, but I though it worthwhile to mention this as a good counterpoint to my own post. 

EXCERPT: 

Commissioners argued mobile-phone spam is harmful because consumers have to pay for the time to delete it...


Hope you find this helpful!

Jim Stroud
Jim Stroud 2.0
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogcharm.com/jimstroud&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogcharm.com/jimstroud&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230; you msy find the comments on this post very helpful: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/q5396" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/q5396</a></p>
<p>Here is a snippet&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/04/HNbancellphonespam_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/04/HNbancellphonespam_1.html</a></p>
<p>Basically what I understand this to mean is that the FCC has lumped in cell-phone spam along with the CAN SPAM Act. Now, keep in mind I don&#8217;t condone spam of any kind, SMS or email, but I though it worthwhile to mention this as a good counterpoint to my own post. </p>
<p>EXCERPT: </p>
<p>Commissioners argued mobile-phone spam is harmful because consumers have to pay for the time to delete it&#8230;</p>
<p>Hope you find this helpful!</p>
<p>Jim Stroud<br />
Jim Stroud 2.0<br />
<a href="http://blogcharm.com/jimstroud" rel="nofollow">http://blogcharm.com/jimstroud</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call Cruncher</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/06/harry_joiner_re.html/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Call Cruncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.co.uk/2006/06/harry_joiner_responds_to_my_question_on_texting_as_a_recruitment_medium.html#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Great article.  I have found that with my husband texting works best while he is at work, becuase he is often in meetings and can always get right back to me with text.  But if I try to text my mother.  She doesn&#039;t even seem to have a clue on how to read the text.  She is still barely figuring out how to make calls on her cell.  So I totally get this article and think it is great.  I look forward to your future work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  I have found that with my husband texting works best while he is at work, becuase he is often in meetings and can always get right back to me with text.  But if I try to text my mother.  She doesn&#8217;t even seem to have a clue on how to read the text.  She is still barely figuring out how to make calls on her cell.  So I totally get this article and think it is great.  I look forward to your future work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

