<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nothing major has changed for years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/nothing_major_has_changed_for_years.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/nothing_major_has_changed_for_years.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/nothing_major_has_changed_for_years.html/comment-page-1#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/nothing_major_has_changed_for_years.html#comment-589</guid>
		<description>How true..

While Mobile 2.0 is touted to be the next big thing with 3.5 G and HSDPA as the data transfer norms, nothing much has changed in the GSM network infrastructure. Perhaps the companies feel that &#039;SIM&#039; card-based GSM technology is as good as it gets. Or perhaps the CDMA technology which is more robust but needs more investment in infrastructure. 

So till we have newer technologies in the cell phone infrstructure space we will have to work with the &#039;SIM cards&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How true..</p>
<p>While Mobile 2.0 is touted to be the next big thing with 3.5 G and HSDPA as the data transfer norms, nothing much has changed in the GSM network infrastructure. Perhaps the companies feel that &#8216;SIM&#8217; card-based GSM technology is as good as it gets. Or perhaps the CDMA technology which is more robust but needs more investment in infrastructure. </p>
<p>So till we have newer technologies in the cell phone infrstructure space we will have to work with the &#8216;SIM cards&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

