<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UK Blackberry Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>Wow! I am &#039;shocked&#039;. 

I thank heavens that I am not affected by this tax. 

But look at it logically. One is bound to integrate personal e-mail accounts on their BlackBerries. This thing just does not make sense to me. When I first read it I was like.. What?!? Kiddin&#039; right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I am &#8217;shocked&#8217;. </p>
<p>I thank heavens that I am not affected by this tax. </p>
<p>But look at it logically. One is bound to integrate personal e-mail accounts on their BlackBerries. This thing just does not make sense to me. When I first read it I was like.. What?!? Kiddin&#8217; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve procter</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>steve procter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>I have just read in the Daily Bull that the government is considering taxing anybody who has owned more than one handset per year under the new Handset Addict Tax.  So for example if in 6 years you have had 28 or more handsets then you will be taxed - and it will be backdated to the day your grandfather was born.

Ewan, I know of a good Pacific Island where the tax man can&#039;t reach you.  The downside is that mobile roaming charges mean calling back to the UK will cost you more than the tax!! ;-)

steve/itagg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read in the Daily Bull that the government is considering taxing anybody who has owned more than one handset per year under the new Handset Addict Tax.  So for example if in 6 years you have had 28 or more handsets then you will be taxed &#8211; and it will be backdated to the day your grandfather was born.</p>
<p>Ewan, I know of a good Pacific Island where the tax man can&#8217;t reach you.  The downside is that mobile roaming charges mean calling back to the UK will cost you more than the tax!! <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>steve/itagg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Apparently it&#039;s just a rumour, so says HMRC in an article on The Register (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/13/rev_wont_tax_blackberries/)

Saying that though, I wouldn&#039;t put it past the Government to do something like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently it&#8217;s just a rumour, so says HMRC in an article on The Register (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/13/rev_wont_tax_blackberries/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/13/rev_wont_tax_blackberries/</a>)</p>
<p>Saying that though, I wouldn&#8217;t put it past the Government to do something like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technokitten</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>technokitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>grrrr.  That one ain&#039;t gonna get him elected as PM when the time comes. Seems really mean-spirited to me on the face of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grrrr.  That one ain&#8217;t gonna get him elected as PM when the time comes. Seems really mean-spirited to me on the face of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/10/the_uk_blackberry_tax.html#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Tossers! 

I&#039;m planning to scratch my arse about 4:30 today... I&#039;ll give gordon a ring to see if he&#039;d like to tax that too.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tossers! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning to scratch my arse about 4:30 today&#8230; I&#8217;ll give gordon a ring to see if he&#8217;d like to tax that too&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
