<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simulscribe converts your voicemails to text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-21680</link>
		<dc:creator>Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-21680</guid>
		<description>SimulScribe was at the CES show in Vegas, and a rep there said that your voicemail goes to a secure server which can&#039;t be accessed unless you send a response back to SimulScribe with an ID number to re-transcribe your message. Only then does it get pulled from the server and transcribed by a human. I&#039;ve also found that profanity isn&#039;t transcribed accurately or comes back as symbols. I just love that I never have to delete messages -- I met this guy in Vegas who had like 6,000 voicemails in his inbox, he puts my couple hundred to shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SimulScribe was at the CES show in Vegas, and a rep there said that your voicemail goes to a secure server which can&#8217;t be accessed unless you send a response back to SimulScribe with an ID number to re-transcribe your message. Only then does it get pulled from the server and transcribed by a human. I&#8217;ve also found that profanity isn&#8217;t transcribed accurately or comes back as symbols. I just love that I never have to delete messages &#8212; I met this guy in Vegas who had like 6,000 voicemails in his inbox, he puts my couple hundred to shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmobile</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>pmobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>I tried using Spinvox, but they told me they don&#039;t offer their service in the U.S. 
I think it breaks down like this: SimulScribe is available in the U.S. and in the U.K. there&#039;s Spinvox.

When I checked into SimulScribe I found that they offer their service in the U.S. and use two types of voice recognition software for their initial transcriptions.  It doesn&#039;t say anything on their website or their voicemail message, but when I called the company I was told that if you don&#039;t like the way the software transcribes your voicemail you just reply to the transcribed message and a human will transcribe the message more accurately for you.  I&#039;ve been using SimulScribe for awhile now and am really digging the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried using Spinvox, but they told me they don&#8217;t offer their service in the U.S.<br />
I think it breaks down like this: SimulScribe is available in the U.S. and in the U.K. there&#8217;s Spinvox.</p>
<p>When I checked into SimulScribe I found that they offer their service in the U.S. and use two types of voice recognition software for their initial transcriptions.  It doesn&#8217;t say anything on their website or their voicemail message, but when I called the company I was told that if you don&#8217;t like the way the software transcribes your voicemail you just reply to the transcribed message and a human will transcribe the message more accurately for you.  I&#8217;ve been using SimulScribe for awhile now and am really digging the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8801</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8801</guid>
		<description>Colleague of mine left a rather ranting voicemail for me earlier on Spinvox, and much to my amusement I found out it&#039;s not always 100% accurate at recognizing swearing.

F***ers got recognised ok.  W**kers had a G before the K, and c***s came out as Tombs(?) 

Apart from that, quite impressed so far - had it on trial since reading this very thread yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colleague of mine left a rather ranting voicemail for me earlier on Spinvox, and much to my amusement I found out it&#8217;s not always 100% accurate at recognizing swearing.</p>
<p>F***ers got recognised ok.  W**kers had a G before the K, and c***s came out as Tombs(?) </p>
<p>Apart from that, quite impressed so far &#8211; had it on trial since reading this very thread yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve procter</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8790</link>
		<dc:creator>steve procter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8790</guid>
		<description>yes Ewan, could you ask Spinvox for a definitive answer as to whether spinvox is automated and/or how many get listened to by humans?  We constantly have debates about it because we are just &quot;too impressed&quot; by it&#039;s success rate to believe that it is all automated.

I once left a message for myself that said &quot;hi can you tell me if you are a robot or a human&quot; - but they just converted it as normal rather than answer me ;-)

steve procter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes Ewan, could you ask Spinvox for a definitive answer as to whether spinvox is automated and/or how many get listened to by humans?  We constantly have debates about it because we are just &#8220;too impressed&#8221; by it&#8217;s success rate to believe that it is all automated.</p>
<p>I once left a message for myself that said &#8220;hi can you tell me if you are a robot or a human&#8221; &#8211; but they just converted it as normal rather than answer me <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>steve procter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technokitten</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8741</link>
		<dc:creator>technokitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8741</guid>
		<description>the spinvox service does tell message leavers what&#039;s about to happen so that person has the chance to not leave a message or leave a different type of message which is less easy to eavesdrop on. But if someone wants to listen in to our calls, voicemails or texts, it&#039;s all possible now anyway. 

That said, the spinvox system is somewhat although not entirely automated. I believe there is human intervention in the process (or at least that&#039;s what I was told by a friend of mine) to ensure that the messages are transcribed correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the spinvox service does tell message leavers what&#8217;s about to happen so that person has the chance to not leave a message or leave a different type of message which is less easy to eavesdrop on. But if someone wants to listen in to our calls, voicemails or texts, it&#8217;s all possible now anyway. </p>
<p>That said, the spinvox system is somewhat although not entirely automated. I believe there is human intervention in the process (or at least that&#8217;s what I was told by a friend of mine) to ensure that the messages are transcribed correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8723</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8723</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re in a business where any of the phone messages might contain sensitive information (example: &quot;the director just approved sale of that major asset&quot;) how do you keep these kinds of people from &quot;eavesdropping&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re in a business where any of the phone messages might contain sensitive information (example: &#8220;the director just approved sale of that major asset&#8221;) how do you keep these kinds of people from &#8220;eavesdropping&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve procter</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8649</link>
		<dc:creator>steve procter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8649</guid>
		<description>yep I&#039;ve been using Spinvox for what seems like donkey years and absolutely swear by it as reading a text or email to see my messages is so much more time efficient than dialing an answerphone.

steve procter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep I&#8217;ve been using Spinvox for what seems like donkey years and absolutely swear by it as reading a text or email to see my messages is so much more time efficient than dialing an answerphone.</p>
<p>steve procter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmobile</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8599</link>
		<dc:creator>pmobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8599</guid>
		<description>I have been using Simulscribe for awhile and the voicemail box has yet to fill up.  I have not had to dial into my voicemail since it comes to my email trascribed as text and with an attached .wav file, but every once in a while for fun I&#039;ll dial in just to see what my voice mail count is.   Today I&#039;m at 651.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Simulscribe for awhile and the voicemail box has yet to fill up.  I have not had to dial into my voicemail since it comes to my email trascribed as text and with an attached .wav file, but every once in a while for fun I&#8217;ll dial in just to see what my voice mail count is.   Today I&#8217;m at 651.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technokitten</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html/comment-page-1#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>technokitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/11/simulscribe_converts_your_voicemails_to_text.html#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>that&#039;ll be Spinvox you&#039;re thinking of (http://www.spinvox.com). I use it and I love it! I never thought I&#039;d find it useful, but for the purposes of testing new stuff, thought I&#039;d give the free trial a go. That must have been 2 years ago. I haven&#039;t looked back since. Customer service is good. About 99% accuracy. You can still dial in to get your messages if you need to and you can reply to your voicemail text messages if the caller called from a mobile to begin with. Genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;ll be Spinvox you&#8217;re thinking of (<a href="http://www.spinvox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spinvox.com</a>). I use it and I love it! I never thought I&#8217;d find it useful, but for the purposes of testing new stuff, thought I&#8217;d give the free trial a go. That must have been 2 years ago. I haven&#8217;t looked back since. Customer service is good. About 99% accuracy. You can still dial in to get your messages if you need to and you can reply to your voicemail text messages if the caller called from a mobile to begin with. Genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
