<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Series mobile mail is billed. Not. Yes it is. No it&#8217;s not. Who knows. Dunno. Er.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:35:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-46762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-46762</guid>
		<description>It seems there&#039;s an error with some X-Series add-ons. Three seem to
think that email is excluded from the 1Gb allowance - I had a proper
nightmare getting Â£12 refunded after having sent a 10Mb email!

However, no matter what customer services say, email is specifically
definitely INCLUDED in your 1Gb allowance.
If they suddenly sneakily change the T&amp;C, I have a timed screenshot of
the page of terms from today that I can send anyone if they need it.

Once again, WEB usage seems to be working fine, but they seem to be
charging EMAIL at the old rates (something ridiculous like Â£1.50/mb,
forget exactly what she said now) which is most definitely wrong! Be
persistant and very clear with customer services, and you WILL get a
refund.

I had to bite my tongue though - they said that they were &quot;willing to
make this goodwill jesture as I was a valued customer of three!&quot;. I
made her admit that this was nothing to do with goodwill, it was the
very least they could do having incorrectly billed. She saw the point
(eventually) and I finally got an apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there&#8217;s an error with some X-Series add-ons. Three seem to<br />
think that email is excluded from the 1Gb allowance &#8211; I had a proper<br />
nightmare getting Â£12 refunded after having sent a 10Mb email!</p>
<p>However, no matter what customer services say, email is specifically<br />
definitely INCLUDED in your 1Gb allowance.<br />
If they suddenly sneakily change the T&amp;C, I have a timed screenshot of<br />
the page of terms from today that I can send anyone if they need it.</p>
<p>Once again, WEB usage seems to be working fine, but they seem to be<br />
charging EMAIL at the old rates (something ridiculous like Â£1.50/mb,<br />
forget exactly what she said now) which is most definitely wrong! Be<br />
persistant and very clear with customer services, and you WILL get a<br />
refund.</p>
<p>I had to bite my tongue though &#8211; they said that they were &#8220;willing to<br />
make this goodwill jesture as I was a valued customer of three!&#8221;. I<br />
made her admit that this was nothing to do with goodwill, it was the<br />
very least they could do having incorrectly billed. She saw the point<br />
(eventually) and I finally got an apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;ve been told by 3 business customer support that surfing to any website is included in X-Series. You don&#039;t have to access it via yahoo or anything daft like that. It would also be extroadinarily difficult and unreliable to track whether you followed a link from yahoo, so that does make sense.

My question though, is whether direct access to pop3/impa4 mail accounts using the phone browser is even possible on X-Series. I&#039;m waiting for X-Series to be launched for my 950i but I&#039;ve been told categorically that the mail ports are blocked even on X-series other than to the 3 server. Is this not the case?

And I join with everyone else in needing to know, assuming it is possible to access mail accounts directly, whether this will be charged extra or included.

Thanks for any help 

Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been told by 3 business customer support that surfing to any website is included in X-Series. You don&#8217;t have to access it via yahoo or anything daft like that. It would also be extroadinarily difficult and unreliable to track whether you followed a link from yahoo, so that does make sense.</p>
<p>My question though, is whether direct access to pop3/impa4 mail accounts using the phone browser is even possible on X-Series. I&#8217;m waiting for X-Series to be launched for my 950i but I&#8217;ve been told categorically that the mail ports are blocked even on X-series other than to the 3 server. Is this not the case?</p>
<p>And I join with everyone else in needing to know, assuming it is possible to access mail accounts directly, whether this will be charged extra or included.</p>
<p>Thanks for any help </p>
<p>Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikiec</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-13204</link>
		<dc:creator>mikiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-13204</guid>
		<description>Right, now I&#039;m even more confused!! :(  When I browse to a website, I get told that I&#039;ll be charged for it.  I phoned 3 customer services and was told (after a long wait) that it was just a standard 3 message, but the charge doesn&#039;t apply on X-Series, but I&#039;m still not convinced.

Does anyone know whether surfing to websites, eg www.champcar.ws is free on X-Series or chargeable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, now I&#8217;m even more confused!! <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   When I browse to a website, I get told that I&#8217;ll be charged for it.  I phoned 3 customer services and was told (after a long wait) that it was just a standard 3 message, but the charge doesn&#8217;t apply on X-Series, but I&#8217;m still not convinced.</p>
<p>Does anyone know whether surfing to websites, eg <a href="http://www.champcar.ws" rel="nofollow">http://www.champcar.ws</a> is free on X-Series or chargeable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s Your Typical International Roaming Charge Complaint at MobHappy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12886</link>
		<dc:creator>Here&#8217;s Your Typical International Roaming Charge Complaint at MobHappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12886</guid>
		<description>[...] 3&#8217;s X-Series &#8212; despite the kinks that are still getting worked out &#8212; is notable in this regard: there are no data roaming fees when you&#8217;re on 3&#8217;s networks elsewhere in the world. Skype calls when roaming are still subject to a charge, but that&#8217;s likely because of the iSkoot voice call mechanism it uses for that, rather than a data connection. Still, it&#8217;s a lot more than can be said about other operators&#8217; plans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3&#8217;s X-Series &#8212; despite the kinks that are still getting worked out &#8212; is notable in this regard: there are no data roaming fees when you&#8217;re on 3&#8217;s networks elsewhere in the world. Skype calls when roaming are still subject to a charge, but that&#8217;s likely because of the iSkoot voice call mechanism it uses for that, rather than a data connection. Still, it&#8217;s a lot more than can be said about other operators&#8217; plans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P e t e</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12683</link>
		<dc:creator>P e t e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12683</guid>
		<description>I emailed the x-series blog a while back to try and get this  info out of them (think it was answer 2 to their &quot;ask us a question&quot; thingy) but it would appear that their answer was in fact a further very skillfully worded answer, rather than in fact giving me the info I was after - namely if you access a POP account (and I was meaning via the email client on the phone) will it be inclusive.

Looks like the x-series offering may not be quite as good as the PR spin would lead you to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed the x-series blog a while back to try and get this  info out of them (think it was answer 2 to their &#8220;ask us a question&#8221; thingy) but it would appear that their answer was in fact a further very skillfully worded answer, rather than in fact giving me the info I was after &#8211; namely if you access a POP account (and I was meaning via the email client on the phone) will it be inclusive.</p>
<p>Looks like the x-series offering may not be quite as good as the PR spin would lead you to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12321</link>
		<dc:creator>ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12321</guid>
		<description>I agree John, the logic does make sense, but I think it&#039;s absolutely RIDICULOUS to say that you get &#039;unlimited mobile email&#039; -- which, as you correctly point out, you DO get.  Just, when it comes to sending mail, you have to make sure you send it via the mobile mail APPLICATION rather than the 3Mail service.

It&#039;s so challenging that I, a bit of a geek when it comes to mobile, didn&#039;t understand it.  It&#039;s only now I&#039;m beginning to understand what happened.

That, I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll agree, is simply not good enough. Not for a company venting forth on fair use policies and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree John, the logic does make sense, but I think it&#8217;s absolutely RIDICULOUS to say that you get &#8216;unlimited mobile email&#8217; &#8212; which, as you correctly point out, you DO get.  Just, when it comes to sending mail, you have to make sure you send it via the mobile mail APPLICATION rather than the 3Mail service.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so challenging that I, a bit of a geek when it comes to mobile, didn&#8217;t understand it.  It&#8217;s only now I&#8217;m beginning to understand what happened.</p>
<p>That, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll agree, is simply not good enough. Not for a company venting forth on fair use policies and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12317</link>
		<dc:creator>John Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12317</guid>
		<description>I believe that by &quot;unlimited mobile mail&quot; they mean mail sent or recieved by the &quot;mobile mail&quot; application. As far as I can tell, what they mean by unlimited data is &quot;unlimited http data&quot;. 3Mail is excluded since it&#039;s billed per message, rather than per amount of data transferred. It&#039;s also sent over smtp rather than http for what it&#039;s worth...
The logic makes sense, it&#039;s just a bit silly. If nothing else, they should at least make it clearer.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that by &#8220;unlimited mobile mail&#8221; they mean mail sent or recieved by the &#8220;mobile mail&#8221; application. As far as I can tell, what they mean by unlimited data is &#8220;unlimited http data&#8221;. 3Mail is excluded since it&#8217;s billed per message, rather than per amount of data transferred. It&#8217;s also sent over smtp rather than http for what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;<br />
The logic makes sense, it&#8217;s just a bit silly. If nothing else, they should at least make it clearer.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12309</link>
		<dc:creator>ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12309</guid>
		<description>fongmickey -- I don&#039;t quite know if it&#039;s billed or not.  You see I paid for a 10mb allowance a while ago so when I access the web from the browser, the access is recorded yet not billed. I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s because all web access is &#039;unlimited&#039; or because of my inclusive amount of data still being on the plan.  

I&#039;m sorry I can&#039;t be more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fongmickey &#8212; I don&#8217;t quite know if it&#8217;s billed or not.  You see I paid for a 10mb allowance a while ago so when I access the web from the browser, the access is recorded yet not billed. I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s because all web access is &#8216;unlimited&#8217; or because of my inclusive amount of data still being on the plan.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I can&#8217;t be more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fongmickey</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12305</link>
		<dc:creator>fongmickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12305</guid>
		<description>Hey Ewan,

A very serious question.

What about you use google search, google returns you 10 result. And, if you access to those results, does these access bill you?

fongmickey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ewan,</p>
<p>A very serious question.</p>
<p>What about you use google search, google returns you 10 result. And, if you access to those results, does these access bill you?</p>
<p>fongmickey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12298</link>
		<dc:creator>ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12298</guid>
		<description>I got a message from Darren, one of the chaps on the X-Series blog, earlier -- so I&#039;ll discuss it with him and hopefully have a solution shortly Glenn.  

One of the key reasons I&#039;ve not wanted to contact the X-Series team is because I&#039;ve been dreading a response!  I really, really hope it&#039;s just a billing mistake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a message from Darren, one of the chaps on the X-Series blog, earlier &#8212; so I&#8217;ll discuss it with him and hopefully have a solution shortly Glenn.  </p>
<p>One of the key reasons I&#8217;ve not wanted to contact the X-Series team is because I&#8217;ve been dreading a response!  I really, really hope it&#8217;s just a billing mistake&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>I really think you should send it into the blog.  Because you&#039;ve been given an answer by someone who might be trying to be helpful by giving her interpretation of how three mail works compared to how web mail works.
Three seem to be trying to push an idea of how mobile data services work from an executive level.  There are bound to be differences of opinion and details to be ironed out between an executive vision, how techies interpret the vision and  how the vision is implemented.
A perfect example is the Skype implementation using GSM to the server first appears like cheating, but from an implementation point of view it&#039;s quite clever.  Three have even said they are looking into getting around the roaming problem with Skype.
So you never know you might be pointing out a hole that seems obvious to us, but just hasn&#039;t been filled at Three&#039;s implementation level yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think you should send it into the blog.  Because you&#8217;ve been given an answer by someone who might be trying to be helpful by giving her interpretation of how three mail works compared to how web mail works.<br />
Three seem to be trying to push an idea of how mobile data services work from an executive level.  There are bound to be differences of opinion and details to be ironed out between an executive vision, how techies interpret the vision and  how the vision is implemented.<br />
A perfect example is the Skype implementation using GSM to the server first appears like cheating, but from an implementation point of view it&#8217;s quite clever.  Three have even said they are looking into getting around the roaming problem with Skype.<br />
So you never know you might be pointing out a hole that seems obvious to us, but just hasn&#8217;t been filled at Three&#8217;s implementation level yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12265</link>
		<dc:creator>ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12265</guid>
		<description>I was going to do so Glenn -- until I spoke to customer services and the lady explained that if I didn&#039;t use Yahoo, then it wasn&#039;t included in the data.

It&#039;s driving me nuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to do so Glenn &#8212; until I spoke to customer services and the lady explained that if I didn&#8217;t use Yahoo, then it wasn&#8217;t included in the data.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s driving me nuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html/comment-page-1#comment-12264</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2006/12/x-series_mobile_mail_is_billed_not_yes_it_is_no_its_not_who_knows_dunno_er.html#comment-12264</guid>
		<description>One of the senior executives of Three has a posting on the X-Series blog (http://xseries.three.com/blog) about the X-Series Fair use &quot;Philosophy&quot;. 

Why don&#039;t you mail your scenario to blog.xseries@three.com and see if they can justify charging for e-mail.  Could be just an initial glitch in the system/philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the senior executives of Three has a posting on the X-Series blog (<a href="http://xseries.three.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://xseries.three.com/blog</a>) about the X-Series Fair use &#8220;Philosophy&#8221;. </p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you mail your scenario to <a href="mailto:blog.xseries@three.com">blog.xseries@three.com</a> and see if they can justify charging for e-mail.  Could be just an initial glitch in the system/philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

