Comments on: SMS non-hole discovered by CEO of Draym in Belgium http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/01/sms_non-hole_discovered_by_ceo_of_draym_in_belgium.html Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: njar http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/01/sms_non-hole_discovered_by_ceo_of_draym_in_belgium.html/comment-page-1#comment-21235 njar Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:43:23 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/01/sms_non-hole_discovered_by_ceo_of_draym_in_belgium.html#comment-21235 I don't get what's happened here? Doesn't sound like he's using dynamic headers only. That would account for making the SMS look like it had come from a particular number, but doesn't explain the charging to someone elses account? Sounds more like he's hacked (inadvertently or otherwise) a carrier SMSC, and managed to submit messages from a certain MSISDN to go out directly from the carrier. I don’t get what’s happened here? Doesn’t sound like he’s using dynamic headers only. That would account for making the SMS look like it had come from a particular number, but doesn’t explain the charging to someone elses account? Sounds more like he’s hacked (inadvertently or otherwise) a carrier SMSC, and managed to submit messages from a certain MSISDN to go out directly from the carrier.

]]> By: loopy http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/01/sms_non-hole_discovered_by_ceo_of_draym_in_belgium.html/comment-page-1#comment-21001 loopy Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:51:44 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/01/sms_non-hole_discovered_by_ceo_of_draym_in_belgium.html#comment-21001 "All the operators are concerned that the simplicity of the programme could result in large-scale fraud". PLEASE REWRITE: " All the operators [using so many external consultancy staff] are concerned that they do not have control of their own 'carrier grade' networks that a simple invasion programme can cause SO MUCH worry to them and expose the MASSIVE holes in their service". It will come as no surprise to the operators that the issue they now face concerning such potential invasive technicques, will soon disappear when they are relegated to the position of 'chief pipe stewards' for the daily upkeep of network pipes so that the nimble IP based companies which supply everything that the mobile users want [at a price they want to pay] will ensure that such simple matters are taken care of within the time needed. PS. Fabrice must be talking about Proximus, they are ARSE.................... “All the operators are concerned that the simplicity of the programme could result in large-scale fraud”.

PLEASE REWRITE: ” All the operators [using so many external consultancy staff] are concerned that they do not have control of their own ‘carrier grade’ networks that a simple invasion programme can cause SO MUCH worry to them and expose the MASSIVE holes in their service”.

It will come as no surprise to the operators that the issue they now face concerning such potential invasive technicques, will soon disappear when they are relegated to the position of ‘chief pipe stewards’ for the daily upkeep of network pipes so that the nimble IP based companies which supply everything that the mobile users want [at a price they want to pay] will ensure that such simple matters are taken care of within the time needed.

PS. Fabrice must be talking about Proximus, they are ARSE………………..

]]>