<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clickatell now offers two-way SMS on a whopping 400+ networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html/comment-page-1#comment-46632</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html#comment-46632</guid>
		<description>Colin,

I believe with Clickatell if you have their inbound service you can add extra numbers to the end of the MSISDN, however it&#039;s not recommended as a lot of mobile carriers don&#039;t support it (especially here in the UK).

What you *could* do is send all the different messages from a different originator, then match up the replies to the original messages and do it that way. I&#039;ve done something similar with our SMSBrite site, shout if you need me to talk you through how it&#039;s done.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin,</p>
<p>I believe with Clickatell if you have their inbound service you can add extra numbers to the end of the MSISDN, however it&#8217;s not recommended as a lot of mobile carriers don&#8217;t support it (especially here in the UK).</p>
<p>What you *could* do is send all the different messages from a different originator, then match up the replies to the original messages and do it that way. I&#8217;ve done something similar with our SMSBrite site, shout if you need me to talk you through how it&#8217;s done.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Brumelle</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html/comment-page-1#comment-46470</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Brumelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html#comment-46470</guid>
		<description>This is a cool feature from Clickatell! 

I have run into a small problem though. Do you know any way to identify which particular SMS message is being responded to? For example, if I send 3 SMS&#039;s to a mobile, and the phone owner responds to one, I&#039;d like to be able to identify which SMS they are responding to. I&#039;m using Clickatells HTTP api, but can&#039;t seem to figure out a way to accomplish this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a cool feature from Clickatell! </p>
<p>I have run into a small problem though. Do you know any way to identify which particular SMS message is being responded to? For example, if I send 3 SMS&#8217;s to a mobile, and the phone owner responds to one, I&#8217;d like to be able to identify which SMS they are responding to. I&#8217;m using Clickatells HTTP api, but can&#8217;t seem to figure out a way to accomplish this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html/comment-page-1#comment-39255</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html#comment-39255</guid>
		<description>Whilst impressive, I would offer one word of caution. If the inbound number is not a national number. Charges to the person sending the message could be higher than they are expecting.

You don&#039;t necessarily have to host SIMs anymore. Many operators will provide cross network Virtual Mobile numbers that can be used for terminating SMS at local rates.

I do agree that 2 way SMS is vital. What other business communication method doesn&#039;t allow you to respond?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst impressive, I would offer one word of caution. If the inbound number is not a national number. Charges to the person sending the message could be higher than they are expecting.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t necessarily have to host SIMs anymore. Many operators will provide cross network Virtual Mobile numbers that can be used for terminating SMS at local rates.</p>
<p>I do agree that 2 way SMS is vital. What other business communication method doesn&#8217;t allow you to respond?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pocket.Net - Mobile 2.0 : Clickatell now offers two-way SMS on a whopping 400+ networks</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html/comment-page-1#comment-39110</link>
		<dc:creator>Pocket.Net - Mobile 2.0 : Clickatell now offers two-way SMS on a whopping 400+ networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/03/clickatell_now_offers_two-way_sms_on_a_whopping_400_networks.html#comment-39110</guid>
		<description>[...] [via SMSText News]        Published Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:06 AM by textually.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via SMSText News]        Published Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:06 AM by textually.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
