Comments on: Have you seen the HTC Touch? http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/06/have_you_seen_the_htc_touch.html Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:17:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: cyclist http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/06/have_you_seen_the_htc_touch.html/comment-page-1#comment-64148 cyclist Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:07:51 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/06/have_you_seen_the_htc_touch.html#comment-64148 There's an extensive review of it at http://www.4winmobile.com Subscribers only right now, but will be available to the public in a few days. Cyclist 4WinMobile Moderator There’s an extensive review of it at http://www.4winmobile.com
Subscribers only right now, but will be available to the public in a few days.

Cyclist
4WinMobile Moderator

]]> By: Darren http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/06/have_you_seen_the_htc_touch.html/comment-page-1#comment-63937 Darren Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:48:08 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/06/have_you_seen_the_htc_touch.html#comment-63937 I'm generally a bit of a WM fanboy, but I've had a chance to use the touch. Apart from the very, very basic features illustrated on HTC's site there is nothing iPhone like about the touch - its 2% iPhone copycat, 98% bog standard WM. Saying that, the form factor is nice. The caveat is that the standard WM keyboard really needs the stylus to get any accuracy at all. I’m generally a bit of a WM fanboy, but I’ve had a chance to use the touch.

Apart from the very, very basic features illustrated on HTC’s site there is nothing iPhone like about the touch – its 2% iPhone copycat, 98% bog standard WM.

Saying that, the form factor is nice. The caveat is that the standard WM keyboard really needs the stylus to get any accuracy at all.

]]>