<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook isn&#8217;t worth $100bn&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/10/facebook_isnt_worth_100bn.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/10/facebook_isnt_worth_100bn.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2007/10/facebook_isnt_worth_100bn.html/comment-page-1#comment-129211</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2007/10/facebook_isnt_worth_100bn.html#comment-129211</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahaha…</p>
<p>a) Only if they actually start to monetise (to a huge extent) it&#8217;s access to personal data / demographics without pissing everyone off and even then, $100 billion? That&#8217;s a lot of money, somewhat overvalued me thinks?</p>
<p>b) Nope.</p>
<p>c) Quite possibly &#8211; but crush wouldn&#8217;t be the adjective I&#8217;d have used.</p>
<p>d) Err, the apps are crap and the GUI isn&#8217;t much better (simple, clean, generic, I grant you) – neither strike me as anything to write home about.</p>
<p>e) I definitely want whatever&#8217;s in their water please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
