<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lord, won&#8217;t you buy me an 8 megapixel Nokia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:15:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html/comment-page-1#comment-213874</link>
		<dc:creator>fr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html#comment-213874</guid>
		<description>Mike is right, and for the tiny sensors they put in phones going much further than the n95&#039;s 5 megapixels is a terrible idea.  The noise in the picture will be a big problem, especially in less than perfect lighting.  I would prefer a lower resolution sensor which is better in low light situations due to the physically larger pixels recieving more light.  

For a normal 6 x 4 print a 2 megapixels sensor would produce great quality, providing the lens, focus, flash etc are good quality also (which they aren&#039;t on most phones!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike is right, and for the tiny sensors they put in phones going much further than the n95&#8217;s 5 megapixels is a terrible idea.  The noise in the picture will be a big problem, especially in less than perfect lighting.  I would prefer a lower resolution sensor which is better in low light situations due to the physically larger pixels recieving more light.  </p>
<p>For a normal 6 x 4 print a 2 megapixels sensor would produce great quality, providing the lens, focus, flash etc are good quality also (which they aren&#8217;t on most phones!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html/comment-page-1#comment-213852</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/lord_wont_you_buy_me_an_8_megapixel_nokia.html#comment-213852</guid>
		<description>Gaaa - megapixels do not a great camera make.

The rust of willy-waving around 10MP digicams has resulted in larger file sizes, but actually *decreased* image quality.

Give me better lenses, not bigger pixel counts.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm  has all the low-down on the Megapixel myth. Don&#039;t believe the hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaaa &#8211; megapixels do not a great camera make.</p>
<p>The rust of willy-waving around 10MP digicams has resulted in larger file sizes, but actually *decreased* image quality.</p>
<p>Give me better lenses, not bigger pixel counts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm</a>  has all the low-down on the Megapixel myth. Don&#8217;t believe the hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
