<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think of the Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ameda</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-236451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ameda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-236451</guid>
		<description>Hey, loved that picture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, loved that picture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technokitten</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-207014</link>
		<dc:creator>technokitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-207014</guid>
		<description>The URL I gave you seems to have picked up the full stop. The link to my article on this is 
http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html

It&#039;s all really interesting food for thought. Hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URL I gave you seems to have picked up the full stop. The link to my article on this is<br />
<a href="http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html" rel="nofollow">http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s all really interesting food for thought. Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-206870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-206870</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With you there James, and Ms Kitten.</p>
<p>The current rather emabrassing rush to Facebook et al by the 20-30&#8217;s has been done in a desperate self-fulfillment frenzy of &#8211; frankly &#8211; sadness. I have close friends who just split up after 10 years of marriage. They are both furiously Facebooking their new single lives&#8230;sadly, their nearly-teenage children can follow along online. WTF prompts people to do this? There&#8217;s reams of dissertation in there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always held that you only have ~5 true friends at any one stage of your life. These are people who will pick you up drunk &amp; dribbling at 3am, clean you up and put you to bed. And you&#8217;d do the same for them.</p>
<p>The idea that Facebook gets you more &#8216;friends&#8217; is just laughable. And sad.</p>
<p>For my money, Facebook and other more fringe apps like Kyte still don&#8217;t offer the level of protection &amp; configurability to make me a confident sharer of personal info. And worse for Facebook, there&#8217;s the ominous shadow of how exactly they are using your info to help out advertisers etc. No wonder Newscorp are interested.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to feel happy &amp; safe sharing our family lifestream online/mobile with the small handful of close friends and relatives who would be genuinely interested. But none of the current services/apps out there give me the confidence.</p>
<p>£0.02.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Whatley</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-206114</link>
		<dc:creator>James Whatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-206114</guid>
		<description>@Scott - You raise a good point regarding the data protection stuff. 

This point was raised at the Future of Mobile conference back in November.

Someone said something along the lines of:

&quot;Given the applications/functionality of today&#039;s phones, how easy would it be to create a program that would read my calendar and my GPS to let party X know where I am, what I&#039;m doing and more importantly, where my kids are and what time they finish school etc...&quot;

I&#039;m not into scaremongering - not by a long shot (I&#039;ll leave that to the Daily Mail) - but yes, Data Protection *is* changing.. and it&#039;ll be next generation that defines it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott &#8211; You raise a good point regarding the data protection stuff. </p>
<p>This point was raised at the Future of Mobile conference back in November.</p>
<p>Someone said something along the lines of:</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the applications/functionality of today&#8217;s phones, how easy would it be to create a program that would read my calendar and my GPS to let party X know where I am, what I&#8217;m doing and more importantly, where my kids are and what time they finish school etc&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not into scaremongering &#8211; not by a long shot (I&#8217;ll leave that to the Daily Mail) &#8211; but yes, Data Protection *is* changing.. and it&#8217;ll be next generation that defines it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technokitten</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-206109</link>
		<dc:creator>technokitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-206109</guid>
		<description>There is also a cultural challenge to overcome... These facebook babies and myspace kids are our future teachers, GPs, business and political leaders. The chances are that they will have exposed their past themselves before they get famous or to the top of their profession. So what&#039;s my point?

Currently, the way recruitment works is that employers want folks with a spotless past, no skeletons in the cupboard and someone who can &#039;stand for their brand&#039;. Except that those skeletons that could previously be hidden from public view, are now very public and very searchable. Our future leaders have already exposed themselves with their embarassing stories of nights of excess and drug-fuelled parties on social networking sites. Their views on life, which over time will no doubt change, are there in black and white. 

So how is Joe Public going to feel about this? Will we still expect our future leaders to be blemish free or will we (as in the older generation) be accepting of this change? Will the recruiters of the future be tolerant to this kind of background if the candidate can do the job properly. Will the lines between public and private life be blurred? And in turn, how will all this affect employment and drug legislation in the future?

I don&#039;t have the answers, but I think about this *a lot* and in fact, I wrote about it last year too http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html. 

Thanks for thinking about it too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also a cultural challenge to overcome&#8230; These facebook babies and myspace kids are our future teachers, GPs, business and political leaders. The chances are that they will have exposed their past themselves before they get famous or to the top of their profession. So what&#8217;s my point?</p>
<p>Currently, the way recruitment works is that employers want folks with a spotless past, no skeletons in the cupboard and someone who can &#8217;stand for their brand&#8217;. Except that those skeletons that could previously be hidden from public view, are now very public and very searchable. Our future leaders have already exposed themselves with their embarassing stories of nights of excess and drug-fuelled parties on social networking sites. Their views on life, which over time will no doubt change, are there in black and white. </p>
<p>So how is Joe Public going to feel about this? Will we still expect our future leaders to be blemish free or will we (as in the older generation) be accepting of this change? Will the recruiters of the future be tolerant to this kind of background if the candidate can do the job properly. Will the lines between public and private life be blurred? And in turn, how will all this affect employment and drug legislation in the future?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have the answers, but I think about this *a lot* and in fact, I wrote about it last year too <a href="http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html" rel="nofollow">http://technokitten.blogspot.com/2007/07/some-thoughts-on-social-media.html</a>. </p>
<p>Thanks for thinking about it too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-205766</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-205766</guid>
		<description>This thinking always leads me to think of the changing shape of data protection. An area which is likely to provoke a yawn - if not already - is now at the beginning of a period of intense change. The up and coming digital children proactively share everything about their lives in order to make new friends/acquaintances, find things out, work out where to go. They do not squirm when building a facebook page as the older generation do - is that a work thing or a social thing? do I want people to know that? - the legal challenge here must be to allow this to happen and to understand to what extent this new audience wants protection rather than simply try and patrol the existing boundaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thinking always leads me to think of the changing shape of data protection. An area which is likely to provoke a yawn &#8211; if not already &#8211; is now at the beginning of a period of intense change. The up and coming digital children proactively share everything about their lives in order to make new friends/acquaintances, find things out, work out where to go. They do not squirm when building a facebook page as the older generation do &#8211; is that a work thing or a social thing? do I want people to know that? &#8211; the legal challenge here must be to allow this to happen and to understand to what extent this new audience wants protection rather than simply try and patrol the existing boundaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html/comment-page-1#comment-205071</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/01/think_of_the_children.html#comment-205071</guid>
		<description>Imagining this information in the context of our own childhood years might be unsettling for some, perhaps even scary for a few.  Future kids will grow up in the context of formidable information saturation and will likely be too busy chronicling their own developing lives to bother with the past - much like generations before them.   Youth curious enought to look at history to make sense of their world might actually benefit from the experience  - yeah, even our occasional documented silliness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagining this information in the context of our own childhood years might be unsettling for some, perhaps even scary for a few.  Future kids will grow up in the context of formidable information saturation and will likely be too busy chronicling their own developing lives to bother with the past &#8211; much like generations before them.   Youth curious enought to look at history to make sense of their world might actually benefit from the experience  &#8211; yeah, even our occasional documented silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
