<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heathrow campaigners engage freetext in their fight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/heathrow_campaigners_engage_freetext_in_their_fight.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/heathrow_campaigners_engage_freetext_in_their_fight.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:37:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/heathrow_campaigners_engage_freetext_in_their_fight.html/comment-page-1#comment-217930</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/02/heathrow_campaigners_engage_freetext_in_their_fight.html#comment-217930</guid>
		<description>&quot;Massively overcrowded, far too much focus on flogging-you-stuff rather than making it easy to get on the plane.&quot;

Try Atlanta, Chicago, Minneapolis - heck *any* us airport compared to Heathrow. 

As for the extra runway ... the sort of logical solution would be build a new airport where no one would be affected, but finding an empty spot in Britain is pretty tough - epsecially if your goal is to be within commuting distance of London.

oh well. I&#039;d hate to live near Heathrow anyway. Not sure why anyone would choose to. The extra runway should be no shock as it&#039;s been mentioned for YEARS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Massively overcrowded, far too much focus on flogging-you-stuff rather than making it easy to get on the plane.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try Atlanta, Chicago, Minneapolis &#8211; heck *any* us airport compared to Heathrow. </p>
<p>As for the extra runway &#8230; the sort of logical solution would be build a new airport where no one would be affected, but finding an empty spot in Britain is pretty tough &#8211; epsecially if your goal is to be within commuting distance of London.</p>
<p>oh well. I&#8217;d hate to live near Heathrow anyway. Not sure why anyone would choose to. The extra runway should be no shock as it&#8217;s been mentioned for YEARS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

