<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG, Samsung promise Android mobiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/lg_samsung_promise_android_mobiles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/lg_samsung_promise_android_mobiles.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:16:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeavyLight</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/02/lg_samsung_promise_android_mobiles.html/comment-page-1#comment-218077</link>
		<dc:creator>HeavyLight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/02/lg_samsung_promise_android_mobiles.html#comment-218077</guid>
		<description>Robert Cringely reckons that Samsung are working to produce two models and they&#039;ll be badged as Google&#039;s gPhone despite all the denials.

&quot;There are two gPhones slated for release with the first coming in September and the second probably not appearing until after Christmas. Given that the first is the high-end model and the second is cheaper, Google will probably expect to make as much money as possible on the higher-margin units at Christmas before revealing the budget model even exists. How Apple-like, eh?

&quot;Both will include WiFi, which makes me wonder if a VoIP client will be there, too. The high-end phone will look somewhat like a Blackberry Pearl, but the screen flips up and there is a keyboard for texting. No word on pricing for the high-end phone, but the second model is intended to be less than $100 â€” AFTER Christmas.&quot;
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2008/pulpit_20080215_004309.html

Here&#039;s hoping!

&lt;em&gt;HeavyLight&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://normob.blogspot.com/2008/02/s60-not-touch-on-iphone.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S60 not a Touch on the iPhone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Cringely reckons that Samsung are working to produce two models and they&#8217;ll be badged as Google&#8217;s gPhone despite all the denials.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are two gPhones slated for release with the first coming in September and the second probably not appearing until after Christmas. Given that the first is the high-end model and the second is cheaper, Google will probably expect to make as much money as possible on the higher-margin units at Christmas before revealing the budget model even exists. How Apple-like, eh?</p>
<p>&#8220;Both will include WiFi, which makes me wonder if a VoIP client will be there, too. The high-end phone will look somewhat like a Blackberry Pearl, but the screen flips up and there is a keyboard for texting. No word on pricing for the high-end phone, but the second model is intended to be less than $100 â€” AFTER Christmas.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2008/pulpit_20080215_004309.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2008/pulpit_20080215_004309.html</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping!</p>
<p><em>HeavyLight&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://normob.blogspot.com/2008/02/s60-not-touch-on-iphone.html' rel="nofollow">S60 not a Touch on the iPhone</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

