<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toughphone: Can it take a Boeing 767?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:39:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219136</guid>
		<description>@Mike: Only if I could get the phone under all 4 of your car wheels simultaneously :-) 

Science is fun :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: Only if I could get the phone under all 4 of your car wheels simultaneously <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Science is fun <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219133</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...thought it was heavier than that, but hey ho. 

So 7 tonnes per wheel eh? that&#039;s about 4 times the weight of my car....so unless the footprint of the 767 tyre is less than 4 times that of my car tyres, you&#039;d get similar results.

Looking at my car&#039;s tyres compaired to the monsters on the plane, I reckon it would be  a close-run thing.

But then saying a JCB Toughphone can survive a pounding from...er...a Volvo Estate just isn&#039;t quite as newsworthy, eh? (Even if I left the dog &amp; 2.4 kids inside)  ;-)

These things are very important to get right.

....I plan to test the iPhone by seeing how many SMSTextNews annuals it can withstand....watch this space....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;thought it was heavier than that, but hey ho. </p>
<p>So 7 tonnes per wheel eh? that&#8217;s about 4 times the weight of my car&#8230;.so unless the footprint of the 767 tyre is less than 4 times that of my car tyres, you&#8217;d get similar results.</p>
<p>Looking at my car&#8217;s tyres compaired to the monsters on the plane, I reckon it would be  a close-run thing.</p>
<p>But then saying a JCB Toughphone can survive a pounding from&#8230;er&#8230;a Volvo Estate just isn&#8217;t quite as newsworthy, eh? (Even if I left the dog &amp; 2.4 kids inside)  <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>These things are very important to get right.</p>
<p>&#8230;.I plan to test the iPhone by seeing how many SMSTextNews annuals it can withstand&#8230;.watch this space&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219116</guid>
		<description>@Mike:  I have had some discussion about this - particularly that the weight of the plane is not evenly distributed between wheels - only about 10% of the weight is supported by the nose. So, with 8 wheels under the wings supporting ~ 58 tonnes (90% of 64 tonnes - actual unladen weight) we&#039;ll be getting around 7 tonnes under each wheel, maybe more if the plane is loaded with cargo.  That&#039;s more than we can achieve with a standard road vehicle and I&#039;m all out of tanks :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike:  I have had some discussion about this &#8211; particularly that the weight of the plane is not evenly distributed between wheels &#8211; only about 10% of the weight is supported by the nose. So, with 8 wheels under the wings supporting ~ 58 tonnes (90% of 64 tonnes &#8211; actual unladen weight) we&#8217;ll be getting around 7 tonnes under each wheel, maybe more if the plane is loaded with cargo.  That&#8217;s more than we can achieve with a standard road vehicle and I&#8217;m all out of tanks <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219099</guid>
		<description>@Steve:  E-mail me at ben.smith@smstextnews.com with some contact details and I&#039;ll see what I can do as/when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve:  E-mail me at <a href="mailto:ben.smith@smstextnews.com">ben.smith@smstextnews.com</a> with some contact details and I&#8217;ll see what I can do as/when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219094</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219094</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...couldn&#039;t you do this much easier by running it over with your car?

Think about it: it&#039;s all relevant to weight/tyre footprint.

So a 100,000kg plane with 10 massive tyres might  exert the same force per square inch on the phone as a 1600kg car with 4 much smaller tyres. Think why 60-ton tanks roll on over wet ground while much lighter cars get stuck.

My car weights 1.6% of an empty 767. Is the tyre footprint a similarly small percentage? No idea. Similarly, a 100kg cyclist on a racing bike with tyres at 120psi would probably be exerting a large PSI (I believe a racing cyclist&#039;s tyre footprint is smaller than a matchbox) - maybe more than a 767.

So, while running a mobile over with a f**k-off big plane might be a Good Day Out for the boys, is it good science? It&#039;s way more sexy than using your nan&#039;s Micra, but does it prove anything more?

Any jobbing aeronautical engineers out there can shed some light?

Must be Friday.

/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;couldn&#8217;t you do this much easier by running it over with your car?</p>
<p>Think about it: it&#8217;s all relevant to weight/tyre footprint.</p>
<p>So a 100,000kg plane with 10 massive tyres might  exert the same force per square inch on the phone as a 1600kg car with 4 much smaller tyres. Think why 60-ton tanks roll on over wet ground while much lighter cars get stuck.</p>
<p>My car weights 1.6% of an empty 767. Is the tyre footprint a similarly small percentage? No idea. Similarly, a 100kg cyclist on a racing bike with tyres at 120psi would probably be exerting a large PSI (I believe a racing cyclist&#8217;s tyre footprint is smaller than a matchbox) &#8211; maybe more than a 767.</p>
<p>So, while running a mobile over with a f**k-off big plane might be a Good Day Out for the boys, is it good science? It&#8217;s way more sexy than using your nan&#8217;s Micra, but does it prove anything more?</p>
<p>Any jobbing aeronautical engineers out there can shed some light?</p>
<p>Must be Friday.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Procter</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219088</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Procter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219088</guid>
		<description>Wicked!!!  we want photos of what sounds like a fun day out!!

Can I give you my old Treo 750 to run over while you&#039;re at it please? I&#039;ll donate Â£50 to charity if I can see a video of it being rolled on by a Jumbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked!!!  we want photos of what sounds like a fun day out!!</p>
<p>Can I give you my old Treo 750 to run over while you&#8217;re at it please? I&#8217;ll donate Â£50 to charity if I can see a video of it being rolled on by a Jumbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html/comment-page-1#comment-219083</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/toughphone_can_it_take_a_boeing_767.html#comment-219083</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately if this comes off it will &#039;only&#039; be a 757 (probably 757-300), but it will weigh 60 tonnes so should do they job... :-)  If it doesn&#039;t I can always ask for a 2nd pass with a 767, but at 80 tonnes that seems excessive to start with.

More news as soon as I have it and the people at Stansted have stopped laughing at me...

&lt;em&gt;Ben Smith&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/iphone_sdk_and_enterprise_features_announced.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPhone SDK and Enterprise features announced&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately if this comes off it will &#8216;only&#8217; be a 757 (probably 757-300), but it will weigh 60 tonnes so should do they job&#8230; <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   If it doesn&#8217;t I can always ask for a 2nd pass with a 767, but at 80 tonnes that seems excessive to start with.</p>
<p>More news as soon as I have it and the people at Stansted have stopped laughing at me&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Ben Smith&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/iphone_sdk_and_enterprise_features_announced.html' rel="nofollow">iPhone SDK and Enterprise features announced</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

