<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truphone v4.0 adds &#8216;Truphone Anywhere&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:39:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-242313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-242313</guid>
		<description>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#039;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now - I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#39;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now &#8211; I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-242312</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-242312</guid>
		<description>I would think that the view of the UK courts would be that any attempt to block a normal UK geographic number would be illegal - under the same argument that T-Mobile were ordered to route traffic to normal Truphone mobile numbers.  Have you any examples or experiences of carriers blocking call through services?  If so, what numbering/tariffs are the call through services using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that the view of the UK courts would be that any attempt to block a normal UK geographic number would be illegal &#8211; under the same argument that T-Mobile were ordered to route traffic to normal Truphone mobile numbers.  Have you any examples or experiences of carriers blocking call through services?  If so, what numbering/tariffs are the call through services using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-242311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-242311</guid>
		<description>James: Any thoughts on the network operators trying to block these numbers as dial-thru providers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: Any thoughts on the network operators trying to block these numbers as dial-thru providers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-242310</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-242310</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve - why don&#039;t you try it - and report back?   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The UK call through numbers are normal geographic (01xxx/02xxx) numbers and so will not cost a fortune or be excluded from your inclusive bundles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve &#8211; why don&#39;t you try it &#8211; and report back?   </p>
<p>The UK call through numbers are normal geographic (01xxx/02xxx) numbers and so will not cost a fortune or be excluded from your inclusive bundles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-235537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-235537</guid>
		<description>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#039;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now - I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#39;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now &#8211; I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226945</guid>
		<description>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#039;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now - I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No specific examples to hand, but remembering back a few years Orange particularly (although I don&#39;t think it was just them) blocked numbers that attempted to use calling cards and the like.  It may be an out-of-date practice now &#8211; I think it maybe related to 0800 numbers back when they were free on some tariffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226944</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226944</guid>
		<description>I would think that the view of the UK courts would be that any attempt to block a normal UK geographic number would be illegal - under the same argument that T-Mobile were ordered to route traffic to normal Truphone mobile numbers.  Have you any examples or experiences of carriers blocking call through services?  If so, what numbering/tariffs are the call through services using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that the view of the UK courts would be that any attempt to block a normal UK geographic number would be illegal &#8211; under the same argument that T-Mobile were ordered to route traffic to normal Truphone mobile numbers.  Have you any examples or experiences of carriers blocking call through services?  If so, what numbering/tariffs are the call through services using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226943</guid>
		<description>James: Any thoughts on the network operators trying to block these numbers as dial-thru providers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: Any thoughts on the network operators trying to block these numbers as dial-thru providers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226942</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226942</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve - why don&#039;t you try it - and report back?   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The UK call through numbers are normal geographic (01xxx/02xxx) numbers and so will not cost a fortune or be excluded from your inclusive bundles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve &#8211; why don&#39;t you try it &#8211; and report back?   </p>
<p>The UK call through numbers are normal geographic (01xxx/02xxx) numbers and so will not cost a fortune or be excluded from your inclusive bundles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smstextnews</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226941</link>
		<dc:creator>smstextnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226941</guid>
		<description>They need to set themselves free from WiFi... Truphone on the sim card will&lt;br&gt;then be usable for the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to set themselves free from WiFi&#8230; Truphone on the sim card will<br />then be usable for the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveRowlands</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226940</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveRowlands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226940</guid>
		<description>I suppose I really should try this TruPhone thing out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it really worth all the hype it seems to get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I really should try this TruPhone thing out.</p>
<p>Is it really worth all the hype it seems to get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226939</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226939</guid>
		<description>Yep... mine is the 01354 prefix which is the Doddington area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230; mine is the 01354 prefix which is the Doddington area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Chotai</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226938</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Chotai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226938</guid>
		<description>but think about how crystal clear the first leg of the call will be :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but think about how crystal clear the first leg of the call will be <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smstextnews</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226937</link>
		<dc:creator>smstextnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226937</guid>
		<description>:: puts away his unlimited landline minutes and 3,000 any network calls&lt;br&gt;account ::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:: puts away his unlimited landline minutes and 3,000 any network calls<br />account ::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226936</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226936</guid>
		<description>Who do we know who fits that description? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do we know who fits that description? <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Chotai</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226935</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Chotai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226935</guid>
		<description>no worries cheers ben! really cool for people who have no good data plans then and lots of landline minutes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no worries cheers ben! really cool for people who have no good data plans then and lots of landline minutes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226934</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think so - it&#039;s an 01xxx xxxxxx format.  My handset&#039;s just died, but I&#039;ll confirm tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t think so &#8211; it&#39;s an 01xxx xxxxxx format.  My handset&#39;s just died, but I&#39;ll confirm tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Chotai</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/truphone_v40_adds_truphone_anywhere.html/comment-page-1#comment-226933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Chotai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6618#comment-226933</guid>
		<description>do we know the number being used for the UK? is it one of those dogey IOM numbers that t-mobile love to charge a bomb for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do we know the number being used for the UK? is it one of those dogey IOM numbers that t-mobile love to charge a bomb for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

