<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US operators hit with SMS charges suit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Britney101</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/comment-page-1#comment-243437</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 08:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6528#comment-243437</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official - SMS &#039;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#039;. I read this article the other day that said it&#039;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#039;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yoober.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.yoober.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s official &#8211; SMS &#39;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#39;. I read this article the other day that said it&#39;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_..</a>.) </p>
<p>It&#39;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. </p>
<p>More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#39;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (<a href="http://www.yoober.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yoober.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney101</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/comment-page-1#comment-234872</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6528#comment-234872</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official - SMS &#039;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#039;. I read this article the other day that said it&#039;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#039;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yoober.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.yoober.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s official &#8211; SMS &#39;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#39;. I read this article the other day that said it&#39;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_..</a>.) </p>
<p>It&#39;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. </p>
<p>More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#39;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (<a href="http://www.yoober.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.yoober.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britney101</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/comment-page-1#comment-225821</link>
		<dc:creator>Britney101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6528#comment-225821</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official - SMS &#039;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#039;. I read this article the other day that said it&#039;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#039;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yoober.com&quot;&gt;www.yoober.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s official &#8211; SMS &#39;more expensive than Hubble Telescope&#39;. I read this article the other day that said it&#39;s 42 times more expensive to send a text message than it is to access data from the space telescope. (<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_v_pricey/"></a><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/txts_r_..</a>.) </p>
<p>It&#39;s about time someone stuck it to the telcos. We are one of a handful of countries where we still need to PAY to recieve messages!! Ridiculous. </p>
<p>More people should get programs like Yoober (well, whoever has a phone that can support it!) until the Telco&#39;s in their ivory towers get the message and reduce SMS costs! (<a href="http://www.yoober.com">http://www.yoober.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ollysk2</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/comment-page-1#comment-225820</link>
		<dc:creator>ollysk2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6528#comment-225820</guid>
		<description>&quot;An indication of America</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;An indication of America</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/05/us_operators_hit_with_sms_charges_suit.html/comment-page-1#comment-225819</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6528#comment-225819</guid>
		<description>This is completely true and a common complaint among users on Howard Forums in the T-Mobile USA sub-forum. Once upon a time T-Mobile had free incoming but has since done away with that feature. T-Mobile may have some of the better messaging packages yet at the same time they leave customer without the option of stopping text. If you call T-Mobile CS they will say if they turn off text then they can&#039;t message you either. That is complete BS. T-Mobile may not have the system setup to prevent outside message and yet allow their messages but that doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is completely true and a common complaint among users on Howard Forums in the T-Mobile USA sub-forum. Once upon a time T-Mobile had free incoming but has since done away with that feature. T-Mobile may have some of the better messaging packages yet at the same time they leave customer without the option of stopping text. If you call T-Mobile CS they will say if they turn off text then they can&#39;t message you either. That is complete BS. T-Mobile may not have the system setup to prevent outside message and yet allow their messages but that doesn&#39;t mean it can&#39;t be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
