<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: End of revenue sharing for Apple and 3G iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:39:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceEden</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html/comment-page-1#comment-245460</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceEden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6805#comment-245460</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Apple don&#039;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#039;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m surprised they haven&#039;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#039;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#039;ll buy SpinVox ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Apple don&#39;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#39;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.</p>
<p>I&#39;m surprised they haven&#39;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#39;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#39;ll buy SpinVox <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceEden</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html/comment-page-1#comment-235034</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceEden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6805#comment-235034</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Apple don&#039;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#039;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m surprised they haven&#039;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#039;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#039;ll buy SpinVox ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Apple don&#39;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#39;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.</p>
<p>I&#39;m surprised they haven&#39;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#39;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#39;ll buy SpinVox <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceEden</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html/comment-page-1#comment-227348</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceEden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6805#comment-227348</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Apple don&#039;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#039;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m surprised they haven&#039;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#039;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#039;ll buy SpinVox ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Apple don&#39;t need a slice of calls and texts if they&#39;re now making money selling software and access to MobileMe.  Gives them an extra revenue stream and means they don;t need to be tied to an operator.</p>
<p>I&#39;m surprised they haven&#39;t set up their own Visual Voicemail servers which customers could use even if they&#39;re not on the preferred network.  Perhaps they&#39;ll buy SpinVox <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/end_of_revenue_sharing_for_apple_and_3g_iphone.html/comment-page-1#comment-227347</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6805#comment-227347</guid>
		<description>The end of the revenue share agreement is being seen as a big victory for the mobile operators but I disagree. I can&#039;t believe a company as canny as Apple gave up a revenue share without major concessions being made by the other side and I wonder whether the &quot;exclusivity&quot; clause is really as rock solid as it seemed a year ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the end of the day, the revenue share tied Apple to O2 and AT&amp;T and now that it might have gone why on earth would Apple continue to promise exclusivity for ever more. I think this one might slip sooner than some people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of the revenue share agreement is being seen as a big victory for the mobile operators but I disagree. I can&#39;t believe a company as canny as Apple gave up a revenue share without major concessions being made by the other side and I wonder whether the &#8220;exclusivity&#8221; clause is really as rock solid as it seemed a year ago. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, the revenue share tied Apple to O2 and AT&#038;T and now that it might have gone why on earth would Apple continue to promise exclusivity for ever more. I think this one might slip sooner than some people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

