<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile TV &#8211; Hit and Miss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-241767</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-241767</guid>
		<description>Nice insight Giff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe you will find that the &#039;survey&#039; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &quot;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impartial?   hmmmmmm.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other point:  41% have &#039;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#039; but only 33% have &#039;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#039;. Note the &#039;up to&#039;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#039;watched&#039; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#039;t be both....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note to PR hacks: don&#039;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#039;s cobblers that it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insight Giff. </p>
<p>I believe you will find that the &#39;survey&#39; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &#8220;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&#8221;</p>
<p>Impartial?   hmmmmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>Other point:  41% have &#39;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#39; but only 33% have &#39;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#39;. Note the &#39;up to&#39;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#39;watched&#39; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#39;t be both&#8230;.</p>
<p>Note to PR hacks: don&#39;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#39;s cobblers that it is.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-241766</link>
		<dc:creator>Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-241766</guid>
		<description>&quot;but it does say that the UK results closely matched those for the US.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really?  Are you saying 41% of consumers in the US have watched video or TV on their phones?  That is going to be difficult with less then 20% of the handsets data enabled in the US and less then 8% of those actually utilizing the data plans for anything outside of email.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where do they get these figures from?  Who paid for this survey?  They obviously bought these results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but it does say that the UK results closely matched those for the US.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Really?  Are you saying 41% of consumers in the US have watched video or TV on their phones?  That is going to be difficult with less then 20% of the handsets data enabled in the US and less then 8% of those actually utilizing the data plans for anything outside of email.</p>
<p>Where do they get these figures from?  Who paid for this survey?  They obviously bought these results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-233482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-233482</guid>
		<description>Nice insight Giff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe you will find that the &#039;survey&#039; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &quot;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impartial?   hmmmmmm.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other point:  41% have &#039;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#039; but only 33% have &#039;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#039;. Note the &#039;up to&#039;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#039;watched&#039; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#039;t be both....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note to PR hacks: don&#039;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#039;s cobblers that it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insight Giff. </p>
<p>I believe you will find that the &#39;survey&#39; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &#8220;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&#8221;</p>
<p>Impartial?   hmmmmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>Other point:  41% have &#39;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#39; but only 33% have &#39;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#39;. Note the &#39;up to&#39;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#39;watched&#39; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#39;t be both&#8230;.</p>
<p>Note to PR hacks: don&#39;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#39;s cobblers that it is.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-225180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-225180</guid>
		<description>Nice insight Giff. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe you will find that the &#039;survey&#039; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &quot;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Impartial?   hmmmmmm.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other point:  41% have &#039;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#039; but only 33% have &#039;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#039;. Note the &#039;up to&#039;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#039;watched&#039; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#039;t be both....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note to PR hacks: don&#039;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#039;s cobblers that it is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insight Giff. </p>
<p>I believe you will find that the &#39;survey&#39; was paid for by Quickplay media, who incidentally &#8220;is the leading provider of  media management and distribution solutions for mobile TV and video services.&#8221;</p>
<p>Impartial?   hmmmmmm&#8230;..</p>
<p>Other point:  41% have &#39;watched Tv or Video on their phone&#39; but only 33% have &#39;watched for up to 60 minutes or longer&#39;. Note the &#39;up to&#39;, which cunningly includes people who accidentally hit the TV app and &#39;watched&#39; for 5 seconds, but gives the impression that 60 minutes is more the norm. So which is it? 33 or 41%? can&#39;t be both&#8230;.</p>
<p>Note to PR hacks: don&#39;t send this sort of stuff to SMSTN unless you want it peeled, diced and exposed for the patent dog&#39;s cobblers that it is.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-225179</link>
		<dc:creator>Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-225179</guid>
		<description>&quot;but it does say that the UK results closely matched those for the US.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really?  Are you saying 41% of consumers in the US have watched video or TV on their phones?  That is going to be difficult with less then 20% of the handsets data enabled in the US and less then 8% of those actually utilizing the data plans for anything outside of email.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where do they get these figures from?  Who paid for this survey?  They obviously bought these results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but it does say that the UK results closely matched those for the US.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Really?  Are you saying 41% of consumers in the US have watched video or TV on their phones?  That is going to be difficult with less then 20% of the handsets data enabled in the US and less then 8% of those actually utilizing the data plans for anything outside of email.</p>
<p>Where do they get these figures from?  Who paid for this survey?  They obviously bought these results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/mobile_tv_-_hit_and_miss.html/comment-page-1#comment-225178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6891#comment-225178</guid>
		<description>Nice distinction between &#039;Mobile TV&#039; and &#039;Video Podcast&#039;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everyone understands the attraction of 5-minute snippets, that you can snack on at leisure, that are managed &amp; sideloaded via a PC. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You probably want to watch in commuting time, which puts you in absolutely the worst scenario for real-time download/stream of video. In a small metal can, surrounded by large bags of water (read: fellow commuters), all moving along narrow routes, sometimes underground. All trying to access the same network at once. Competing with voice &amp; data traffic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Capacity &amp; coverage nightmare for MNO&#039;s. Crap, frustrating experience for users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No-one wants mobile TV except mobile TV hardware and content vendors. Believe their &#039;Surveys&#039; at your peril....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice distinction between &#39;Mobile TV&#39; and &#39;Video Podcast&#39;. </p>
<p>Everyone understands the attraction of 5-minute snippets, that you can snack on at leisure, that are managed &#038; sideloaded via a PC. </p>
<p>You probably want to watch in commuting time, which puts you in absolutely the worst scenario for real-time download/stream of video. In a small metal can, surrounded by large bags of water (read: fellow commuters), all moving along narrow routes, sometimes underground. All trying to access the same network at once. Competing with voice &#038; data traffic.</p>
<p>Capacity &#038; coverage nightmare for MNO&#39;s. Crap, frustrating experience for users.</p>
<p>No-one wants mobile TV except mobile TV hardware and content vendors. Believe their &#39;Surveys&#39; at your peril&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
