Comments on: Bell, Telus face class action lawsuit http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ken http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-240984 Ken Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:05:07 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-240984 The biggest issue with Telus charging for incoming texts is that the receiver of the text does not have control over those texts coming in. Even if the phone is off and the battery is removed the incoming texts are still being charged to the account. This is very wrong! The receiver must have the ability to accept each identifiable text as it comes in and it should not be charged unless he/she decides to open in to view. It is like being charged for phone calls that you don't answer! HELLO!!!??? The biggest issue with Telus charging for incoming texts is that the receiver of the text does not have control over those texts coming in. Even if the phone is off and the battery is removed the incoming texts are still being charged to the account. This is very wrong! The receiver must have the ability to accept each identifiable text as it comes in and it should not be charged unless he/she decides to open in to view. It is like being charged for phone calls that you don't answer! HELLO!!!???

]]> By: Ken http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-229973 Ken Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:05:07 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-229973 The biggest issue with Telus charging for incoming texts is that the receiver of the text does not have control over those texts coming in. Even if the phone is off and the battery is removed the incoming texts are still being charged to the account. This is very wrong! The receiver must have the ability to accept each identifiable text as it comes in and it should not be charged unless he/she decides to open in to view. It is like being charged for phone calls that you don't answer! HELLO!!!??? The biggest issue with Telus charging for incoming texts is that the receiver of the text does not have control over those texts coming in. Even if the phone is off and the battery is removed the incoming texts are still being charged to the account. This is very wrong! The receiver must have the ability to accept each identifiable text as it comes in and it should not be charged unless he/she decides to open in to view. It is like being charged for phone calls that you don't answer! HELLO!!!???

]]> By: Ricky Chotai http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-226010 Ricky Chotai Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:19:02 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-226010 if that happened in the uk then people would be very angry indeed. Shocking! if that happened in the uk then people would be very angry indeed. Shocking!

]]> By: Krystal http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-226009 Krystal Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:17:40 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-226009 nope. Only get charged to send. nope. Only get charged to send.

]]> By: smstextnews http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-226012 smstextnews Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:17:14 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-226012 Here, here Here, here

]]> By: Samantha http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-226011 Samantha Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:14:13 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-226011 I want to know, how in Business anyone could even think of charging their customers for receiving a text someone else sent them! <br><br>Why would anyone even think of doing that?<br><br>Samantha. I want to know, how in Business anyone could even think of charging their customers for receiving a text someone else sent them!

Why would anyone even think of doing that?

Samantha.

]]> By: Ricky Chotai http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/bell_telus_face_class_action_lawsuit.html/comment-page-1#comment-226008 Ricky Chotai Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:44:20 +0000 http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7598#comment-226008 Krystal in canada have you never been charged for incoming sms, on any network? Krystal in canada have you never been charged for incoming sms, on any network?

]]>