<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blykwatch &#8211; On Holiday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DanLane</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-246046</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-246046</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost certain (but don&#039;t have the time to look into it right now) that MNOs were supposed to have setup bilateral porting agreements so they can offer number portability as required by Ofcom and if Blyk have failed to do so they may be operating against Ofcom regulations. I&#039;m sure there is a vague document on the Ofcom site somewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure they&#039;ve found a loophole, but still, I&#039;m sure it says somewhere that operators must at least try to offer number portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m almost certain (but don&#39;t have the time to look into it right now) that MNOs were supposed to have setup bilateral porting agreements so they can offer number portability as required by Ofcom and if Blyk have failed to do so they may be operating against Ofcom regulations. I&#39;m sure there is a vague document on the Ofcom site somewhere.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure they&#39;ve found a loophole, but still, I&#39;m sure it says somewhere that operators must at least try to offer number portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-246045</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-246045</guid>
		<description>Ahh, the rudeness of the Blyk people... - &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, the rudeness of the Blyk people&#8230; &#8211; <a href="http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-246044</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-246044</guid>
		<description>I never thought I would read, hear, or say that Tesco Mobile is better than another operator! I think it just shows how ridiculous the whole situation is getting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the MMS issues, by tomorrow (Wednesday  8th July), it&#039;ll be two weeks since I have been able to open an MMS from Blyk. It will also be two weeks since I have waited for a response which either tells me how to fix it properly, or that Blyk have a problem. So far the best I have received is a dismal response over the phone (go a mile away, pft!), and on the forums, the standard &quot;We&#039;ll pass this on to our technical team&quot;... I&#039;m beginning to wonder if they are a figment of someone&#039;s imagination... Why is it, nothing really get&#039;s fixed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m about to phone up Blyk, and record what is said. I can also assure you, I&#039;ll be getting angry, from the responses I&#039;ve read the Blyk Member Care phone people are far from helpful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice holiday!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I would read, hear, or say that Tesco Mobile is better than another operator! I think it just shows how ridiculous the whole situation is getting. </p>
<p>As for the MMS issues, by tomorrow (Wednesday  8th July), it&#39;ll be two weeks since I have been able to open an MMS from Blyk. It will also be two weeks since I have waited for a response which either tells me how to fix it properly, or that Blyk have a problem. So far the best I have received is a dismal response over the phone (go a mile away, pft!), and on the forums, the standard &#8220;We&#39;ll pass this on to our technical team&#8221;&#8230; I&#39;m beginning to wonder if they are a figment of someone&#39;s imagination&#8230; Why is it, nothing really get&#39;s fixed?</p>
<p>I&#39;m about to phone up Blyk, and record what is said. I can also assure you, I&#39;ll be getting angry, from the responses I&#39;ve read the Blyk Member Care phone people are far from helpful.</p>
<p>Have a nice holiday!</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanLane</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-226780</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-226780</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost certain (but don&#039;t have the time to look into it right now) that MNOs were supposed to have setup bilateral porting agreements so they can offer number portability as required by Ofcom and if Blyk have failed to do so they may be operating against Ofcom regulations. I&#039;m sure there is a vague document on the Ofcom site somewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure they&#039;ve found a loophole, but still, I&#039;m sure it says somewhere that operators must at least try to offer number portability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m almost certain (but don&#39;t have the time to look into it right now) that MNOs were supposed to have setup bilateral porting agreements so they can offer number portability as required by Ofcom and if Blyk have failed to do so they may be operating against Ofcom regulations. I&#39;m sure there is a vague document on the Ofcom site somewhere.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sure they&#39;ve found a loophole, but still, I&#39;m sure it says somewhere that operators must at least try to offer number portability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-226779</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-226779</guid>
		<description>Ahh, the rudeness of the Blyk people... - &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx&quot;&gt;http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, the rudeness of the Blyk people&#8230; &#8211; <a href="http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx">http://forum.blyk.co.uk/forums/post/10906.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/07/blykwatch_-_on_holiday.html/comment-page-1#comment-226778</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=7039#comment-226778</guid>
		<description>I never thought I would read, hear, or say that Tesco Mobile is better than another operator! I think it just shows how ridiculous the whole situation is getting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the MMS issues, by tomorrow (Wednesday  8th July), it&#039;ll be two weeks since I have been able to open an MMS from Blyk. It will also be two weeks since I have waited for a response which either tells me how to fix it properly, or that Blyk have a problem. So far the best I have received is a dismal response over the phone (go a mile away, pft!), and on the forums, the standard &quot;We&#039;ll pass this on to our technical team&quot;... I&#039;m beginning to wonder if they are a figment of someone&#039;s imagination... Why is it, nothing really get&#039;s fixed?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m about to phone up Blyk, and record what is said. I can also assure you, I&#039;ll be getting angry, from the responses I&#039;ve read the Blyk Member Care phone people are far from helpful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have a nice holiday!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I would read, hear, or say that Tesco Mobile is better than another operator! I think it just shows how ridiculous the whole situation is getting. </p>
<p>As for the MMS issues, by tomorrow (Wednesday  8th July), it&#39;ll be two weeks since I have been able to open an MMS from Blyk. It will also be two weeks since I have waited for a response which either tells me how to fix it properly, or that Blyk have a problem. So far the best I have received is a dismal response over the phone (go a mile away, pft!), and on the forums, the standard &#8220;We&#39;ll pass this on to our technical team&#8221;&#8230; I&#39;m beginning to wonder if they are a figment of someone&#39;s imagination&#8230; Why is it, nothing really get&#39;s fixed?</p>
<p>I&#39;m about to phone up Blyk, and record what is said. I can also assure you, I&#39;ll be getting angry, from the responses I&#39;ve read the Blyk Member Care phone people are far from helpful.</p>
<p>Have a nice holiday!</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
