I'm still bitter at MOMOLondon for making me get a Yahoo account to join the group, although it came in handy when flickr sold out. I'll probably get Disqus sorted at some stage

I think there are times when a completely personalised, print-on-demand postcard will be the right thing, but it still loses its edge unless it's hand-written or at least hand-signed. A digital signature just doesn't cut it but in certain circumstances, I guess it would do. I personally loathe Christmas cards that are auto-generated. Either send me a hand-written personalised Christmas Card, or don't bother thanks.

So yes, moo.com should probably do this unless the cost of production is prohibitive as it's a nice product fit for them. Would something like this cause a dramatic increase in postcard sending? Unlikely.

The creativity, personalisation, 'ME' factors of the mobile-generated photo (Location – I was here – now – so was everyone else) along with the convenience / immediacy *Moment* of 'click-note-send'?

A mass-market postcard benefits from the personal handwriting on the back to make the emotional connection, to give it currency. The mobile-generated image would do the same for the mobile postcard. and it's *tangible*. The recipient can hold it, pin it up, pop it in an album or shoebox. Make the font handwritten, Comic MS, something like that. Teach it my handwriting style, Highlander-property-deeds-like

The MMS or emailed image is nice, but in being so easy to send, so intangible, so deletable, it looses a lot.

We received a heartfelt, handwritten thank-you note today in the post. It's on the mantlepiece now. No email or MMS or MoSoSo posting could ever convey the same emotion and connection.

Peer to peer MMS in the UK has rocketed over the past few years, as have wholesale volumes.

The networks still have much work to do, but the simple fact remains that there isn't a better way to communicate multimedia content between remote handsets. SMS was pretty rubbish in the olden days, and it's now totally stock solid. There are low level reasons why MMS isn't as solid, but I'll not bore you..

We need to embrace the MMS….

Have also thrown this conversation at the people at Moo too.

So fingers crossed!

MMS would be complete rubbish printed out postcard-size (no wonder they failed if they ever existed).

You need MP-resolution, not kb resolution. Integrated. Payment method stored. Frequent addresses stored ( 'Gran' / 'Mum' / 'Honey' / 'Loosers in office')

Maybe even pre-filled text blocks: “Nyaa nyaa see me on the beach. Wish you were here – NOT!” or “Dear Gran, here are some lovely piccys of the children on the beach”.

The icing on this mashup cake would be a geotagged reference to where the image was taken.

Ooooooh……

/m

MMS for various technical and interconnect reasons is not likely to ever be as reliable as SMS. Within the UK it's very reliable now and if the user is roaming on a decent network, the chances are it'll work.

The argument about MMS growth being attributed to holidays, and that MMS will sound the death knell for postcards is all crap!

Who between the ages of 15 and 35 actually sends: Postcards/Letters/Christmas Cards/Paper Invites? We're the digital comms generation. Paper is too analogue.

That postcard printing idea is brilliant though!

“Fox has just reported that MMS is killing the postcard industry…”

FOX?! Do me a favour… and MMS is SO unreliable I'd sooner send a postcard.

…although – and I've hawked this around a few places now (I'm looking at you Moo.com & ShoZu) wouldn't it be GREAT if I could *actually* send a physical postcard from my phone.

Snap – add copy – add address – send to ShoZu/Moo
ShoZu/Moo receive – print – send

Digital -> Tangible