<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stephen Fry likes the S2 Skypephone too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:33:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html/comment-page-1#comment-244105</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html#comment-244105</guid>
		<description>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#039;t make them - others do - Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#039;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting that on the &#039;Skypephone S2&#039; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#39;t make them &#8211; others do &#8211; Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#39;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#39;s.</p>
<p>Interesting that on the &#39;Skypephone S2&#39; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html/comment-page-1#comment-234866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html#comment-234866</guid>
		<description>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#039;t make them - others do - Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#039;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting that on the &#039;Skypephone S2&#039; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#39;t make them &#8211; others do &#8211; Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#39;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#39;s.</p>
<p>Interesting that on the &#39;Skypephone S2&#39; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html/comment-page-1#comment-229382</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html#comment-229382</guid>
		<description>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#039;t make them - others do - Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#039;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#039;s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting that on the &#039;Skypephone S2&#039; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it. For all its being a verb now, Skype actually has a tiny cashflow from the tiny % of users who actually pay them cash to talk. If they made a phone themselves, they would need to MVNO with a partner to run them on. They already sell WiFi handsets, but they don&#39;t make them &#8211; others do &#8211; Linksys Netgear, Belkin etc. Deciding to make and sell a phone is a seriously expensive, long-term move that requires significant cashflow to back it up. I don&#39;t think Skype have that, hence all the devices have been done by others, with Skype licencing their app / brand. eBay could back such a move, but it would be a big fight with existing MNO&#39;s.</p>
<p>Interesting that on the &#39;Skypephone S2&#39; the Skype branding is nowhere to be seen, unlike the S1, where it was in-yer-face. Is this less a Skypephone, more a phone that has Skype, among Facebook, MSN etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimAtJaxtr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html/comment-page-1#comment-229370</link>
		<dc:creator>JimAtJaxtr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/stephen_fry_likes_the_s2_skypephone_too.html#comment-229370</guid>
		<description>Nice. I wonder if Skype will ever get big into making phones. Then they don&#039;t have to worry about making people download their tool. The fewer barriers to users using a tool the better. For instance, at jaxtr, you don&#039;t need to download anything to make calls. But nonetheless, it sounds like a cool phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. I wonder if Skype will ever get big into making phones. Then they don&#39;t have to worry about making people download their tool. The fewer barriers to users using a tool the better. For instance, at jaxtr, you don&#39;t need to download anything to make calls. But nonetheless, it sounds like a cool phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

