Comments on: AQL’s 007 James Bond forwarding numbers revealed http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/aqls_007_james_bond_forwarding_numbers_revealed.html Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:21:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jamesbody http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/aqls_007_james_bond_forwarding_numbers_revealed.html/comment-page-1#comment-244688 jamesbody Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:00:57 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=10805#comment-244688 But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?<br><br>The name is James, James Bo** - definately shaken, but very rarely stirred! But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?

The name is James, James Bo** – definately shaken, but very rarely stirred!

]]> By: jamesbody http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/aqls_007_james_bond_forwarding_numbers_revealed.html/comment-page-1#comment-235383 jamesbody Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:00:57 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=10805#comment-235383 But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?<br><br>The name is James, James Bo** - definately shaken, but very rarely stirred! But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?

The name is James, James Bo** – definately shaken, but very rarely stirred!

]]> By: jamesbody http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/aqls_007_james_bond_forwarding_numbers_revealed.html/comment-page-1#comment-231045 jamesbody Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:00:57 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=10805#comment-231045 But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?<br><br>The name is James, James Bo** - definately shaken, but very rarely stirred! But why would one want a 007, when one already has (and is) 001?

The name is James, James Bo** – definately shaken, but very rarely stirred!

]]>