<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Mobile-CrushesÃ¢â‚¬Â Ã¢â‚¬â€œ They end now!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-242294</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-242294</guid>
		<description>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think &quot;Bigger, better, faster&quot; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#039;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think &#8220;Bigger, better, faster&#8221; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#39;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.</p>
<p>Food for thought!</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-242295</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-242295</guid>
		<description>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#039;t appeal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#039;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#39;t appeal. </p>
<p>From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#39;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-232994</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-232994</guid>
		<description>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think &quot;Bigger, better, faster&quot; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#039;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think &#8220;Bigger, better, faster&#8221; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#39;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.</p>
<p>Food for thought!</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-232995</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-232995</guid>
		<description>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#039;t appeal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#039;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#39;t appeal. </p>
<p>From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#39;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-231860</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-231860</guid>
		<description>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think &quot;Bigger, better, faster&quot; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#039;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You summed it up perfectly there Ocifant!</p>
<p>I don&#39;t think &#8220;Bigger, better, faster&#8221; is necessarily a good thing; because it&#39;s only ever improving a product in one direction. Whereas, products (Mobile Phones) should be improved in more than just one sense; and for that to happen we need to allow people to own mobiles long enough, and to extend the time between releases long enough in order to firstly create a better understanding of what a product lacks and needs, and how it can be best implemented.</p>
<p>Food for thought!</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-231859</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-231859</guid>
		<description>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#039;t appeal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#039;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Samantha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan, I just looked up at the INQ1; and I have to say it doesn&#39;t appeal. </p>
<p>From what I have read it is trying to be like the iPhone; which is basically trying to me like a laptop. It doesn&#39;t have the originality, or the uniqueness that I seek in a mobile right now.</p>
<p>Samantha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-231835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-231835</guid>
		<description>The INQ1 from 3 doesn&#039;t get your attention, Samantha?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The INQ1 from 3 doesn&#39;t get your attention, Samantha?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocifant</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-231830</link>
		<dc:creator>ocifant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-231830</guid>
		<description>I think I know how you&#039;re feeling Sam. I&#039;m also looking around at the moment, but there isn&#039;t a phone there that &#039;grabs&#039; me big time. they&#039;ve all got something missing - often unquantifiable. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t want to lose facilities I currently have, and don&#039;t want to have to change the way e.g. I organise my photos on the PC, just to fit with the latest and greatest idea which will be out of date again next week when some bright spark has a different (not always better) idea of how I should work with my phone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess what I&#039;m after is some stability for a while which incidently would allow for economies of scale to kick in on the price as retooling wouldn&#039;t be such a necessity. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is change (Bigger! Better! faster! more!) always a good thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I know how you&#39;re feeling Sam. I&#39;m also looking around at the moment, but there isn&#39;t a phone there that &#39;grabs&#39; me big time. they&#39;ve all got something missing &#8211; often unquantifiable. </p>
<p>I don&#39;t want to lose facilities I currently have, and don&#39;t want to have to change the way e.g. I organise my photos on the PC, just to fit with the latest and greatest idea which will be out of date again next week when some bright spark has a different (not always better) idea of how I should work with my phone. </p>
<p>I guess what I&#39;m after is some stability for a while which incidently would allow for economies of scale to kick in on the price as retooling wouldn&#39;t be such a necessity. </p>
<p>Is change (Bigger! Better! faster! more!) always a good thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip Hakes</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile-crushes_they_end_now.html/comment-page-1#comment-231822</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip Hakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11535#comment-231822</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if you tell people on here what you are after (what the phone needs to be able to do) then we can possibly recommend one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if you tell people on here what you are after (what the phone needs to be able to do) then we can possibly recommend one.</p>
<p>K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

