<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile broadband wireless routers come to T-Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-245051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-245051</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dan - firstly, the networks are not yet shared. Trial calls have been made, but widespread integration is not with us yet. That&#039;s at least a year away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, it&#039;s only RAN that is shared - the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &quot;Comes down to the numbers&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with Dan &#8211; firstly, the networks are not yet shared. Trial calls have been made, but widespread integration is not with us yet. That&#39;s at least a year away.</p>
<p>Secondly, it&#39;s only RAN that is shared &#8211; the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. </p>
<p>You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.</p>
<p>And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.</p>
<p>These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.</p>
<p> Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &#8220;Comes down to the numbers&#8221;.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-234039</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-234039</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dan - firstly, the networks are not yet shared. Trial calls have been made, but widespread integration is not with us yet. That&#039;s at least a year away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, it&#039;s only RAN that is shared - the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &quot;Comes down to the numbers&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with Dan &#8211; firstly, the networks are not yet shared. Trial calls have been made, but widespread integration is not with us yet. That&#39;s at least a year away.</p>
<p>Secondly, it&#39;s only RAN that is shared &#8211; the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. </p>
<p>You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.</p>
<p>And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.</p>
<p>These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.</p>
<p> Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &#8220;Comes down to the numbers&#8221;.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike42</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231705</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Dan - firstly, the networks are not yet shared. That&#039;s at least a year away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, it&#039;s only RAN that is shared - the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &quot;Comes down to the numbers&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with Dan &#8211; firstly, the networks are not yet shared. That&#39;s at least a year away.</p>
<p>Secondly, it&#39;s only RAN that is shared &#8211; the core networks and internet connectivity is separate. </p>
<p>You can have a stonkingly fast air interface, only to be throttled by a rubbish SGSN or IP layer.</p>
<p>And just because you share RAN, does not in any way, shape or means dictate that separate business entities should or will offer similar or the same devices at the same speed, price or service points.</p>
<p>These days, for 95% of the population, coverage is not an issue. And unless you are on O2, mobile broadband speeds are much of a muchness. Networks will leapfrog each other with Â£GPP releases, but on the whole, speeds are comparable.</p>
<p> Unless you only get coverage from one network, everything mobile &#8220;Comes down to the numbers&#8221;.</p>
<p>/m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231699</guid>
		<description>I know what he means :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what he means <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanLane</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231698</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231698</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile and Three have a 3G mast and access equipment sharing deal... that&#039;s not &quot;using the same network&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile and Three have a 3G mast and access equipment sharing deal&#8230; that&#39;s not &#8220;using the same network&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231697</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231697</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no fail there -- it&#039;s all about the numbers :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s no fail there &#8212; it&#39;s all about the numbers <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worldofnokia</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231695</link>
		<dc:creator>worldofnokia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231695</guid>
		<description>we have had a few in for a few days.  going to try one out but they are good value</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we have had a few in for a few days.  going to try one out but they are good value</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanLane</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231694</link>
		<dc:creator>DanLane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231694</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Seeing as they are both using the same network, the clear winner has to come down to the numbers at the end of the day.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Journalistic fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Seeing as they are both using the same network, the clear winner has to come down to the numbers at the end of the day.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Journalistic fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimFu</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231692</link>
		<dc:creator>JimFu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231692</guid>
		<description>My mate has 2 modems with T-Mobile so popped into their shop to buy one of these routers, only to be told that they were only available to him if he took out a third contract! Not good customer service imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mate has 2 modems with T-Mobile so popped into their shop to buy one of these routers, only to be told that they were only available to him if he took out a third contract! Not good customer service imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_broadband_wireless_routers_come_to_t-mobile.html/comment-page-1#comment-231691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11553#comment-231691</guid>
		<description>Except the D100 is a crappy piece of..... well... read my review: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/three_wifi_3g_router_crap.html&quot;&gt;http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/thr...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mine went back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope the T-mobile unit is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the D100 is a crappy piece of&#8230;.. well&#8230; read my review: <a href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/three_wifi_3g_router_crap.html">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/10/thr&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Mine went back.</p>
<p>Hope the T-mobile unit is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

