<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile phones get a 52-inch widescreen TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 40 inch tv</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-249090</link>
		<dc:creator>40 inch tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11372#comment-249090</guid>
		<description>Awesome!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squawkBOX</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-241989</link>
		<dc:creator>squawkBOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11372#comment-241989</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivalent to X size screen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely it is like advertising 21&quot; monitors as 100&quot; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However the devices are pretty cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivalent to X size screen.  </p>
<p>Surely it is like advertising 21&#8243; monitors as 100&#8243; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]</p>
<p>However the devices are pretty cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squawkBOX</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-234557</link>
		<dc:creator>squawkBOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11372#comment-234557</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivalent to X size screen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely it is like advertising 21&quot; monitors as 100&quot; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However the devices are pretty cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivalent to X size screen.  </p>
<p>Surely it is like advertising 21&#8243; monitors as 100&#8243; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]</p>
<p>However the devices are pretty cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squawkBOX</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/mobile_phones_get_a_52-inch_widescreen_tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-231557</link>
		<dc:creator>squawkBOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11372#comment-231557</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivilent to X size screen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely it is like advertising 21&quot; monitors as 100&quot; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However the devices are pretty cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve always had a bit of an issue with the way that those things are marketed.  I would rather see that they are advertised as filling your whole vision (or similar) rather than them saying that they are equivilent to X size screen.  </p>
<p>Surely it is like advertising 21&#8243; monitors as 100&#8243; screens (if you place your nose right on the screen)!  [rant over]</p>
<p>However the devices are pretty cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

