<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Nokia 6260 mobile slides into view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/new_nokia_6260_mobile_slides_into_view.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/new_nokia_6260_mobile_slides_into_view.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyGlynn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/new_nokia_6260_mobile_slides_into_view.html/comment-page-1#comment-243425</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyGlynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11690#comment-243425</guid>
		<description>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#039;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. &lt;br&gt;It looks just like the 6600 slide. &lt;br&gt;Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#39;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. <br />It looks just like the 6600 slide. <br />Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyGlynn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/new_nokia_6260_mobile_slides_into_view.html/comment-page-1#comment-234611</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyGlynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11690#comment-234611</guid>
		<description>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#039;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. &lt;br&gt;It looks just like the 6600 slide. &lt;br&gt;Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#39;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. <br />It looks just like the 6600 slide. <br />Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyGlynn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/new_nokia_6260_mobile_slides_into_view.html/comment-page-1#comment-231811</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyGlynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11690#comment-231811</guid>
		<description>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#039;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. &lt;br&gt;It looks just like the 6600 slide. &lt;br&gt;Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having happily owned the original 6260 I think it&#39;s a real shame this new device is such a basic slide form with fingerprint prone finish. <br />It looks just like the 6600 slide. <br />Lazy designers. At least the features are a step up from the usual series 40 device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

