<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadcom develops 802.11n chip for mobiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Software</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html/comment-page-1#comment-243120</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12395#comment-243120</guid>
		<description>YES my company is making an app which will make it so you can also tune into stations online but they will than be resent to others in about a 3 mile radious as AM!&lt;br&gt;(So all people by the chip can see who is listening to what)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES my company is making an app which will make it so you can also tune into stations online but they will than be resent to others in about a 3 mile radious as AM!<br />(So all people by the chip can see who is listening to what)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affordable Software</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html/comment-page-1#comment-237694</link>
		<dc:creator>Affordable Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12395#comment-237694</guid>
		<description>YES my company is making an app which will make it so you can also tune into stations online but they will than be resent to others in about a 3 mile radious as AM!&lt;br&gt;(So all people by the chip can see who is listening to what)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES my company is making an app which will make it so you can also tune into stations online but they will than be resent to others in about a 3 mile radious as AM!<br />(So all people by the chip can see who is listening to what)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derosnec</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html/comment-page-1#comment-235654</link>
		<dc:creator>derosnec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12395#comment-235654</guid>
		<description>Without impacting battery life?  Really?  That&#039;s a mighty big promise!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Colour me sceptical though - the bottleneck in getting data from point A to a phone is usually the device OS itself... or the back-end &#039;net connection... or the serving application.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, downloading faster doesn&#039;t mean you will save battery.  Intelligent software design is the best way to save battery life on Wi-Fi.  Wi-Fi suffers because it is always &quot;on&quot; (unlike GSM which drops into a low power mode until paged).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My final concern is that I barely see manufacturers advertising 802.11G - its just Wi-Fi.  I wonder if N will really be a differentiator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without impacting battery life?  Really?  That&#39;s a mighty big promise!</p>
<p>Colour me sceptical though &#8211; the bottleneck in getting data from point A to a phone is usually the device OS itself&#8230; or the back-end &#39;net connection&#8230; or the serving application.</p>
<p>Also, downloading faster doesn&#39;t mean you will save battery.  Intelligent software design is the best way to save battery life on Wi-Fi.  Wi-Fi suffers because it is always &#8220;on&#8221; (unlike GSM which drops into a low power mode until paged).</p>
<p>My final concern is that I barely see manufacturers advertising 802.11G &#8211; its just Wi-Fi.  I wonder if N will really be a differentiator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derosnec</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/broadcom_develops_80211n_chip_for_mobiles_.html/comment-page-1#comment-232362</link>
		<dc:creator>derosnec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12395#comment-232362</guid>
		<description>Without impacting battery life?  Really?  That&#039;s a mighty big promise!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Colour me sceptical though - the bottleneck in getting data from point A to a phone is usually the device OS itself... or the back-end &#039;net connection... or the serving application.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, downloading faster doesn&#039;t mean you will save battery.  Intelligent software design is the best way to save battery life on Wi-Fi.  Wi-Fi suffers because it is always &quot;on&quot; (unlike GSM which drops into a low power mode until paged).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My final concern is that I barely see manufacturers advertising 802.11G - its just Wi-Fi.  I wonder if N will really be a differentiator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without impacting battery life?  Really?  That&#39;s a mighty big promise!</p>
<p>Colour me sceptical though &#8211; the bottleneck in getting data from point A to a phone is usually the device OS itself&#8230; or the back-end &#39;net connection&#8230; or the serving application.</p>
<p>Also, downloading faster doesn&#39;t mean you will save battery.  Intelligent software design is the best way to save battery life on Wi-Fi.  Wi-Fi suffers because it is always &#8220;on&#8221; (unlike GSM which drops into a low power mode until paged).</p>
<p>My final concern is that I barely see manufacturers advertising 802.11G &#8211; its just Wi-Fi.  I wonder if N will really be a differentiator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

