<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I shouldn&#8217;t have bought a Motorola Q9c</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-244111</link>
		<dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-244111</guid>
		<description>i ahve a q9 and it rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i ahve a q9 and it rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-237635</link>
		<dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-237635</guid>
		<description>i ahve a q9 and it rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i ahve a q9 and it rocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-233486</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-233486</guid>
		<description>No, that&#039;s not a problem Nacho. I&#039;d successfully dialed from that address book entry before.  It&#039;s just now and again the Q9 OS gives up and won&#039;t interface correctly with the hardware.  It won&#039;t dial *anything*, not even 911.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#39;s not a problem Nacho. I&#39;d successfully dialed from that address book entry before.  It&#39;s just now and again the Q9 OS gives up and won&#39;t interface correctly with the hardware.  It won&#39;t dial *anything*, not even 911.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nacho</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-233485</link>
		<dc:creator>nacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-233485</guid>
		<description>Not to defend the Moto... but there&#039;s seem to be an space between the +44 and the rest of the phone number. Some handsets will view that as a number that is not valid&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having said that, I agree: Moto is shite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to defend the Moto&#8230; but there&#39;s seem to be an space between the +44 and the rest of the phone number. Some handsets will view that as a number that is not valid</p>
<p>Having said that, I agree: Moto is shite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-233484</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-233484</guid>
		<description>cock. hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cock. hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nacho</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-233487</link>
		<dc:creator>nacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-233487</guid>
		<description>I see ... another reason to dump the phone !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see &#8230; another reason to dump the phone !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-232634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-232634</guid>
		<description>No, that&#039;s not a problem Nacho. I&#039;d successfully dialed from that address book entry before.  It&#039;s just now and again the Q9 OS gives up and won&#039;t interface correctly with the hardware.  It won&#039;t dial *anything*, not even 911.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#39;s not a problem Nacho. I&#39;d successfully dialed from that address book entry before.  It&#39;s just now and again the Q9 OS gives up and won&#39;t interface correctly with the hardware.  It won&#39;t dial *anything*, not even 911.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nacho</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-232631</link>
		<dc:creator>nacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-232631</guid>
		<description>Not to defend the Moto... but there&#039;s seem to be an space between the +44 and the rest of the phone number. Some handset will view that as a number that is not valid&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having said that, I agree: Moto is shite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to defend the Moto&#8230; but there&#39;s seem to be an space between the +44 and the rest of the phone number. Some handset will view that as a number that is not valid</p>
<p>Having said that, I agree: Moto is shite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-232630</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-232630</guid>
		<description>cock. hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cock. hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesbody</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-232628</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesbody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-232628</guid>
		<description>I just love the Basil Fawlty-esque nature of this video.  All that is required to complete it is a shot of Ewan wrenching off a branch from a tree iwith which to thresh his hapless Q9 into submission!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love the Basil Fawlty-esque nature of this video.  All that is required to complete it is a shot of Ewan wrenching off a branch from a tree iwith which to thresh his hapless Q9 into submission!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyhoops</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/why_i_shouldnt_have_bought_a_motorola_q9c.html/comment-page-1#comment-232624</link>
		<dc:creator>andyhoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12682#comment-232624</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ve been round the houses on this before, but WM6.1 is a vast improvement and on my Q9h I&#039;ve never seen that problem. If you can be bothered to go through the download and update process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually a Q running WM6.1 is a very likeable device. A comment which probably recategorises me as the other type of cock in your mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#39;ve been round the houses on this before, but WM6.1 is a vast improvement and on my Q9h I&#39;ve never seen that problem. If you can be bothered to go through the download and update process.</p>
<p>Actually a Q running WM6.1 is a very likeable device. A comment which probably recategorises me as the other type of cock in your mind <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

