<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Nano &#8216;in the works&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html/comment-page-1#comment-242952</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13474#comment-242952</guid>
		<description>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#039;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#039;s camera capabilites in an untenable position :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#39;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#39;s camera capabilites in an untenable position <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html/comment-page-1#comment-233892</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13474#comment-233892</guid>
		<description>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#039;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#039;s camera capabilites in an untenable position :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#39;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#39;s camera capabilites in an untenable position <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html/comment-page-1#comment-233852</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13474#comment-233852</guid>
		<description>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#039;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#039;s camera capabilites in an untenable position :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be a great move, especially if everything just works from a software developer&#39;s point of view (exactly same OS etc.). It will also be a great move if they include the same 2MP camera, thus giving users some camera capability, but also leaving the current travesty of the premium full size iPhone with 1990&#39;s camera capabilites in an untenable position <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

