<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of Media Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech guy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-253235</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13234#comment-253235</guid>
		<description>Technology is really of the humans best, but we really need to distinguish ourselves at some point, too much tech can really harm us in many ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is really of the humans best, but we really need to distinguish ourselves at some point, too much tech can really harm us in many ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-244498</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13234#comment-244498</guid>
		<description>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &quot;4th Estate&quot; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#039;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &quot;Into The Buzzsaw&quot; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#039;s plenty more evidence, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So...if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &quot;some dodgy internet site&quot; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#039;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And don&#039;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://Digg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg.com&lt;/a&gt; either - they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &#8220;4th Estate&#8221; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#39;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &#8220;Into The Buzzsaw&#8221; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#39;s plenty more evidence, too.</p>
<p>So&#8230;if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &#8220;some dodgy internet site&#8221; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#39;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.</p>
<p>And don&#39;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like <a href="http://Digg.com" rel="nofollow">Digg.com</a> either &#8211; they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-234013</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13234#comment-234013</guid>
		<description>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &quot;4th Estate&quot; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#039;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &quot;Into The Buzzsaw&quot; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#039;s plenty more evidence, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So...if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &quot;some dodgy internet site&quot; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#039;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And don&#039;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://Digg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg.com&lt;/a&gt; either - they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &#8220;4th Estate&#8221; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#39;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &#8220;Into The Buzzsaw&#8221; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#39;s plenty more evidence, too.</p>
<p>So&#8230;if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &#8220;some dodgy internet site&#8221; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#39;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.</p>
<p>And don&#39;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like <a href="http://Digg.com" rel="nofollow">Digg.com</a> either &#8211; they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-233619</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13234#comment-233619</guid>
		<description>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &quot;4th Estate&quot; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#039;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &quot;Into The Buzzsaw&quot; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#039;s plenty more evidence, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So...if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &quot;some dodgy internet site&quot; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#039;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And don&#039;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://Digg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg.com&lt;/a&gt; either - they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mainstream media is heavily biased, and controlled, when it comes to reporting non trivial news (and even trivia is sensationalised). We like to think the media is the &#8220;4th Estate&#8221; as the Americans call it, independent arbiters of truth, justice and the Western way. But actually, they&#39;re not, and have been on a VERY short leash for quite some time. Read &#8220;Into The Buzzsaw&#8221; by Kristina Borjesson, just for starters. There&#39;s plenty more evidence, too.</p>
<p>So&#8230;if real news can be routed around the mainstream media, then it is to be welcomed. Direct connections to those at the heart of news stories are to be welcomed. Those who scoff at non-mainstream media as &#8220;some dodgy internet site&#8221; (or alternative insult of your choice), are actually quite correct. There IS rubbish out there. But don&#39;t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are also many excellent sources that are far more accurate and truthful than any mainstream source whose editors and managers hide their connections with corporate interests, government, and security services.</p>
<p>And don&#39;t turn to allegedly user-generated news sites like <a href="http://Digg.com" rel="nofollow">Digg.com</a> either &#8211; they sold their souls to the devil some time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_power_of_media_technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-233599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13234#comment-233599</guid>
		<description>Have you been reading about the Gaza/Israeli twitterings, Samantha?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been reading about the Gaza/Israeli twitterings, Samantha?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

