<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The useless element with Vodafone Passport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex Candy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/comment-page-1#comment-243935</link>
		<dc:creator>alex Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13197#comment-243935</guid>
		<description>Vodafone passport is offered in Japan because Vodafone used to own a GSM network now called SoftBank. Vodafone passport is not offered in the USA because At&amp;t wireless and T-Mobile the only two GSM networks in the States are not part of the Vodafone family. Verizon wireless is in part owned by Vodafone but as its a CDMA carrier handsets from most of the world including the UK do not work on that system. Offering passport on Verizon would be useless to Vodafone customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vodafone passport is offered in Japan because Vodafone used to own a GSM network now called SoftBank. Vodafone passport is not offered in the USA because At&#038;t wireless and T-Mobile the only two GSM networks in the States are not part of the Vodafone family. Verizon wireless is in part owned by Vodafone but as its a CDMA carrier handsets from most of the world including the UK do not work on that system. Offering passport on Verizon would be useless to Vodafone customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex Candy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/comment-page-1#comment-238088</link>
		<dc:creator>alex Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13197#comment-238088</guid>
		<description>Vodafone passport is offered in Japan because Vodafone used to own a GSM network now called SoftBank. Vodafone passport is not offered in the USA because At&amp;t wireless and T-Mobile the only two GSM networks in the States are not part of the Vodafone family. Verizon wireless is in part owned by Vodafone but as its a CDMA carrier handsets from most of the world including the UK do not work on that system. Offering passport on Verizon would be useless to Vodafone customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vodafone passport is offered in Japan because Vodafone used to own a GSM network now called SoftBank. Vodafone passport is not offered in the USA because At&#038;t wireless and T-Mobile the only two GSM networks in the States are not part of the Vodafone family. Verizon wireless is in part owned by Vodafone but as its a CDMA carrier handsets from most of the world including the UK do not work on that system. Offering passport on Verizon would be useless to Vodafone customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/comment-page-1#comment-233869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13197#comment-233869</guid>
		<description>Yeah.. it&#039;s the hassle isn&#039;t it?  Gahhh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.. it&#39;s the hassle isn&#39;t it?  Gahhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/comment-page-1#comment-233592</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13197#comment-233592</guid>
		<description>Yeah.. it&#039;s the hassle isn&#039;t it?  Gahhh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.. it&#39;s the hassle isn&#39;t it?  Gahhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry-Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/the_useless_element_with_vodafone_passport.html/comment-page-1#comment-233591</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry-Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13197#comment-233591</guid>
		<description>I would bet that you could claim them back if they did.  Do the T&amp;Cs describe a call/connection.  If not you would have a good chance in court to recoup any repeat charges if you could show repeat short calls between the same numbers over a short period of time.  Assuming you are a consumer of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would bet that you could claim them back if they did.  Do the T&#038;Cs describe a call/connection.  If not you would have a good chance in court to recoup any repeat charges if you could show repeat short calls between the same numbers over a short period of time.  Assuming you are a consumer of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

