<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK&#8217;s cheapest tariff to launch at £8.99</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:01:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Morrison </title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-242287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Morrison </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-242287</guid>
		<description>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 - probably more like 15 - 20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 &#8211; probably more like 15 &#8211; 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-242286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-242286</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this will entice more PAYGers to swap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this will entice more PAYGers to swap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warzabidul</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-242285</link>
		<dc:creator>warzabidul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-242285</guid>
		<description>Should take into consideration the quality of coverage of all networks where you live. If it&#039;s cheap there&#039;s a good chance that the network coverage in certain regions is lacking. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may have the cheapest contract but without a signal you&#039;ve got nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should take into consideration the quality of coverage of all networks where you live. If it&#39;s cheap there&#39;s a good chance that the network coverage in certain regions is lacking. </p>
<p>You may have the cheapest contract but without a signal you&#39;ve got nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Morrison aka mostlythis</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-234026</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Morrison aka mostlythis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-234026</guid>
		<description>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 - probably more like 15 - 20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 &#8211; probably more like 15 &#8211; 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Morrison aka mostlythis</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-233969</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Morrison aka mostlythis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-233969</guid>
		<description>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 - probably more like 15 - 20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or go for a simplicity / sim only deal.  but offering low cost contracts is a good move. trouble is your monthly bill will never just be Â£9 &#8211; probably more like 15 &#8211; 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan @ MIR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-233960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan @ MIR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-233960</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this will entice more PAYGers to swap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this will entice more PAYGers to swap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warzabidul</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/uks_cheapest_tariff_to_launch_at_899.html/comment-page-1#comment-233958</link>
		<dc:creator>warzabidul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13507#comment-233958</guid>
		<description>Should take into consideration the quality of coverage of all networks where you live. If it&#039;s cheap there&#039;s a good chance that the network coverage in certain regions is lacking. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may have the cheapest contract but without a signal you&#039;ve got nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should take into consideration the quality of coverage of all networks where you live. If it&#39;s cheap there&#39;s a good chance that the network coverage in certain regions is lacking. </p>
<p>You may have the cheapest contract but without a signal you&#39;ve got nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

