<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who does T-Mobile UK whitelisting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:31:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WapReview</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-245178</link>
		<dc:creator>WapReview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-245178</guid>
		<description>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, &lt;a href=&quot;http://yeswap.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yeswap.com&lt;/a&gt;, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#039;s family filter  for the last six months. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#039;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&#039;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#039;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#039;t customer or &quot;partner&quot; you don&#039;t exist. as far as Verizon&#039;s concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, <a href="http://yeswap.com" rel="nofollow">yeswap.com</a>, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#39;s family filter  for the last six months. </p>
<p>The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#39;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.</p>
<p>I haven&#39;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#39;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#39;t customer or &#8220;partner&#8221; you don&#39;t exist. as far as Verizon&#39;s concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WapReview</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-234028</link>
		<dc:creator>WapReview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-234028</guid>
		<description>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, &lt;a href=&quot;http://yeswap.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yeswap.com&lt;/a&gt;, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#039;s family filter  for the last six months. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#039;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&#039;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#039;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#039;t customer or &quot;partner&quot; you don&#039;t exist. as far as Verizon&#039;s concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, <a href="http://yeswap.com" rel="nofollow">yeswap.com</a>, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#39;s family filter  for the last six months. </p>
<p>The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#39;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.</p>
<p>I haven&#39;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#39;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#39;t customer or &#8220;partner&#8221; you don&#39;t exist. as far as Verizon&#39;s concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WapReview</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233942</link>
		<dc:creator>WapReview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233942</guid>
		<description>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, &lt;a href=&quot;http://yeswap.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;yeswap.com&lt;/a&gt;, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#039;s family filter  for the last six months. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#039;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven&#039;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#039;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#039;t customer or &quot;partner&quot; you don&#039;t exist. as far as Verizon&#039;s concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This indeed a horible problem.  One of my sites, <a href="http://yeswap.com" rel="nofollow">yeswap.com</a>, a simple mobile portal has been blocked by Verizon&#39;s family filter  for the last six months. </p>
<p>The site has never contained anything the least bit questionable nor has it ever linked to any adult, dating, chat or gambling sites. I don&#39;t accept advertising for these types of content either.  There is nothing unsuitable for minors on the site at all.</p>
<p>I haven&#39;t been able  to find anyone at Verizon who admits to knowing anything about the family filter or whitelisting. The carrier doesn&#39;t seem to have any contact person for unafiliated content providers at all.  If you aren&#39;t customer or &#8220;partner&#8221; you don&#39;t exist. as far as Verizon&#39;s concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markhmxt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233870</link>
		<dc:creator>Markhmxt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233870</guid>
		<description>For those interested but not on the Momo list, our Nick at MX&#039;s response&lt;br&gt;--------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;G&#039;day James,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others&lt;br&gt;on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a&lt;br&gt;little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve recently relocated to Sydney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after&lt;br&gt;access to mobile internet sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called&lt;br&gt;SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URLs can be tested for compatibility at&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should also be able to request re-classification.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in&lt;br&gt;fact they were the first to get involved);&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs&lt;br&gt;with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs&lt;br&gt;generally cannot be whitelisted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;O2 don&#039;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#039;m aware.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval&lt;br&gt;process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope you get your site sorted soon!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nick  &lt;br&gt;CEO&lt;br&gt;MX Telecom Australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested but not on the Momo list, our Nick at MX&#39;s response<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>G&#39;day James,</p>
<p>Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others<br />on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a<br />little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,<br />I&#39;ve recently relocated to Sydney.</p>
<p>The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after<br />access to mobile internet sites.</p>
<p>As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called<br />SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.</p>
<p>URLs can be tested for compatibility at<br /><a href="http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp" rel="nofollow">http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp</a></p>
<p>You should also be able to request re-classification.</p>
<p>In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in<br />fact they were the first to get involved);</p>
<p><a href="http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp</a></p>
<p>Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs<br />with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs<br />generally cannot be whitelisted.</p>
<p>O2 don&#39;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#39;m aware.</p>
<p>Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval<br />process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.</p>
<p>Hope you get your site sorted soon!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Nick  <br />CEO<br />MX Telecom Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markh</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-253169</link>
		<dc:creator>Markh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-253169</guid>
		<description>For those interested and not on the Momo list, our Nick&#039;s response to James:

-----------------------------------

G&#039;day James,

Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others
on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a
little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,
I&#039;ve recently relocated to Sydney.

The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after
access to mobile internet sites.

As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called
SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.

URLs can be tested for compatibility at
http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp

You should also be able to request re-classification.

In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in
fact they were the first to get involved);

http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp

Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs
with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs
generally cannot be whitelisted.

O2 don&#039;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#039;m aware.

Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval
process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.


For any further info or advice on the above, please don&#039;t hesitate to
get in touch with either myself or Thomas Green our new UK head of sales
(thomas.green@mxtelecom.com).

Hope you get your site sorted soon!

Best Regards,

Nick  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested and not on the Momo list, our Nick&#8217;s response to James:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>G&#8217;day James,</p>
<p>Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others<br />
on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a<br />
little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,<br />
I&#8217;ve recently relocated to Sydney.</p>
<p>The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after<br />
access to mobile internet sites.</p>
<p>As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called<br />
SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.</p>
<p>URLs can be tested for compatibility at<br />
<a href="http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp" rel="nofollow">http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp</a></p>
<p>You should also be able to request re-classification.</p>
<p>In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in<br />
fact they were the first to get involved);</p>
<p><a href="http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp</a></p>
<p>Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs<br />
with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs<br />
generally cannot be whitelisted.</p>
<p>O2 don&#8217;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#8217;m aware.</p>
<p>Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval<br />
process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.</p>
<p>For any further info or advice on the above, please don&#8217;t hesitate to<br />
get in touch with either myself or Thomas Green our new UK head of sales<br />
(thomas.green@mxtelecom.com).</p>
<p>Hope you get your site sorted soon!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markhmxt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233865</link>
		<dc:creator>Markhmxt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233865</guid>
		<description>For those interested but not on the Momo list, our Nick at MX&#039;s response&lt;br&gt;--------------------------&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;G&#039;day James,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others&lt;br&gt;on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a&lt;br&gt;little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve recently relocated to Sydney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after&lt;br&gt;access to mobile internet sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called&lt;br&gt;SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;URLs can be tested for compatibility at&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You should also be able to request re-classification.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in&lt;br&gt;fact they were the first to get involved);&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs&lt;br&gt;with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs&lt;br&gt;generally cannot be whitelisted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;O2 don&#039;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#039;m aware.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval&lt;br&gt;process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope you get your site sorted soon!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nick  &lt;br&gt;CEO&lt;br&gt;MX Telecom Australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested but not on the Momo list, our Nick at MX&#39;s response<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>G&#39;day James,</p>
<p>Please find the below info which I hope will be useful to you and others<br />on the list.  A tiny caveat is that there is a small chance my info is a<br />little out of date; after 7 years looking after sales at MX in the UK,<br />I&#39;ve recently relocated to Sydney.</p>
<p>The networks have adopted a variety of different methods to look after<br />access to mobile internet sites.</p>
<p>As far as I am aware T-Mobile still uses a web-filter company called<br />SurfControl to control mobile web site classification and access.</p>
<p>URLs can be tested for compatibility at<br /><a href="http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp" rel="nofollow">http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/MTAS.asp</a></p>
<p>You should also be able to request re-classification.</p>
<p>In terms of the other networks, Vodafone adopts a similar system (in<br />fact they were the first to get involved);</p>
<p><a href="http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp</a></p>
<p>Orange has an internal system called SafeGuard which blocks any URLs<br />with adult content.  Unmoderated UGC sites are also blocked.  URLs<br />generally cannot be whitelisted.</p>
<p>O2 don&#39;t implement any form of URL blocking as far as I&#39;m aware.</p>
<p>Three generally requires mobile internet sites to go through an approval<br />process at which stage your URLs would be made accessible anyway.</p>
<p>Hope you get your site sorted soon!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Nick  <br />CEO<br />MX Telecom Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMSblack</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233851</link>
		<dc:creator>SMSblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233851</guid>
		<description>Oh Lord won&#039;t you you buy me a James Whatley?&lt;br&gt;My friends don&#039;t use social media, I must make amends ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Lord won&#39;t you you buy me a James Whatley?<br />My friends don&#39;t use social media, I must make amends &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMSblack</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233838</link>
		<dc:creator>SMSblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233838</guid>
		<description>Oh Lord won&#039;t you you buy me a James Whatley?&lt;br&gt;My friends don&#039;t use social media, I must make amends ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Lord won&#39;t you you buy me a James Whatley?<br />My friends don&#39;t use social media, I must make amends &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moof</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/who_does_t-mobile_uk_whitelisting_.html/comment-page-1#comment-233819</link>
		<dc:creator>Moof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13464#comment-233819</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that&#039;s 100% true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The company shouldn&#039;t need a James Whatley. The company needs good people at the end of a phone who know what they&#039;re doing, and can fix this from that level, and an easy way for those who aren&#039;t asking how to send a text message to get to them. It should be possible to call T-mobile and get this fixed easily, without having to resort to contacting one man who circumvents the normal system to get things fixed. The normal system should just get things fixed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Putting a James Whatley in there is a solution to the the symptoms of the problem, and even a stopgap measure, or maybe even an aid to diagnosing the problem. But it doesn&#039;t resolve the problem itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think that&#39;s 100% true.</p>
<p>The company shouldn&#39;t need a James Whatley. The company needs good people at the end of a phone who know what they&#39;re doing, and can fix this from that level, and an easy way for those who aren&#39;t asking how to send a text message to get to them. It should be possible to call T-mobile and get this fixed easily, without having to resort to contacting one man who circumvents the normal system to get things fixed. The normal system should just get things fixed.</p>
<p>Putting a James Whatley in there is a solution to the the symptoms of the problem, and even a stopgap measure, or maybe even an aid to diagnosing the problem. But it doesn&#39;t resolve the problem itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

