<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vodafone and 3 to merge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/vodafone_and_3_to_merge.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/vodafone_and_3_to_merge.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:31:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/vodafone_and_3_to_merge.html/comment-page-1#comment-245685</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=14774#comment-245685</guid>
		<description>Rob, I think you&#039;re contradicting yourself there :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You say &quot;the enterprise will henceforth be trading solely under the â€˜3â€² brand name&quot; while a couple of sentences further on you cite the press release with &quot;Vodafone Australia Limited and Hutchinson 3G Australia Pty, will be run under the new name of VHA Pty Limited.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m just bringing this up because I wish that &#039;3&#039; would remain its own brand and was shocked when I heard of this press release a few days ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems likely that the &#039;3&#039; brand will only remain as long as the merger needs to be approved and a new marketing &amp; branding strategy is figured out. Then it will probably cease to exist and become a &#039;Vodafone&#039; service/sub-brand. This can take quite a while, until then it&#039;s business as usual. The integration of infrastructure is apparently happening as we speak as the merger is a done deal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only hope that this new brand will retain some of the inventiveness and willingness to extend the boundaries that &#039;3&#039; did understand so well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So much for healthy competition though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I think you&#39;re contradicting yourself there <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You say &#8220;the enterprise will henceforth be trading solely under the â€˜3â€² brand name&#8221; while a couple of sentences further on you cite the press release with &#8220;Vodafone Australia Limited and Hutchinson 3G Australia Pty, will be run under the new name of VHA Pty Limited.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#39;m just bringing this up because I wish that &#39;3&#39; would remain its own brand and was shocked when I heard of this press release a few days ago. </p>
<p>It seems likely that the &#39;3&#39; brand will only remain as long as the merger needs to be approved and a new marketing &#038; branding strategy is figured out. Then it will probably cease to exist and become a &#39;Vodafone&#39; service/sub-brand. This can take quite a while, until then it&#39;s business as usual. The integration of infrastructure is apparently happening as we speak as the merger is a done deal.</p>
<p>I only hope that this new brand will retain some of the inventiveness and willingness to extend the boundaries that &#39;3&#39; did understand so well.</p>
<p>So much for healthy competition though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/vodafone_and_3_to_merge.html/comment-page-1#comment-236632</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=14774#comment-236632</guid>
		<description>Rob, I think your contradicting yourself there :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You say &quot;the enterprise will henceforth be trading solely under the â€˜3â€² brand name&quot; while a couple of sentences further on you cite the press release with &quot;Vodafone Australia Limited and Hutchinson 3G Australia Pty, will be run under the new name of VHA Pty Limited.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m just bringing this up because I wish that &#039;3&#039; would remain its own brand and was shocked when I heard of this press release a few days ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems likely that the &#039;3&#039; brand will only remain as long as the merger needs to be approved and a new marketing &amp; branding strategy is figured out. Then it will probably cease to exist and become a &#039;Vodafone&#039; service/sub-brand. This can take quite a while, until then it&#039;s business as usual. The integration of infrastructure is apparently happening as we speak as the merger is a done deal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I only hope that this new brand will retain some of the inventiveness and willingness to extend the boundaries that &#039;3&#039; did understand so well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So much for healthy competition though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I think your contradicting yourself there <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You say &#8220;the enterprise will henceforth be trading solely under the â€˜3â€² brand name&#8221; while a couple of sentences further on you cite the press release with &#8220;Vodafone Australia Limited and Hutchinson 3G Australia Pty, will be run under the new name of VHA Pty Limited.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#39;m just bringing this up because I wish that &#39;3&#39; would remain its own brand and was shocked when I heard of this press release a few days ago. </p>
<p>It seems likely that the &#39;3&#39; brand will only remain as long as the merger needs to be approved and a new marketing &#038; branding strategy is figured out. Then it will probably cease to exist and become a &#39;Vodafone&#39; service/sub-brand. This can take quite a while, until then it&#39;s business as usual. The integration of infrastructure is apparently happening as we speak as the merger is a done deal.</p>
<p>I only hope that this new brand will retain some of the inventiveness and willingness to extend the boundaries that &#39;3&#39; did understand so well.</p>
<p>So much for healthy competition though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorBennett</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/vodafone_and_3_to_merge.html/comment-page-1#comment-236620</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorBennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=14774#comment-236620</guid>
		<description>Wow - I didn&#039;t see this coming whatsoever!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What an intriguing development, I fairly sure it&#039;ll never happen here in the UK though, not least as Vodafone have their world wide HQ here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good old 3 hey!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trevor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; I didn&#39;t see this coming whatsoever!</p>
<p>What an intriguing development, I fairly sure it&#39;ll never happen here in the UK though, not least as Vodafone have their world wide HQ here.</p>
<p>Good old 3 hey!</p>
<p>Trevor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

