Comments on: MIR gets on the wrong side of Coracle Group

By: Ant Carroll

Ant Carroll — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:28:58 +0000

When I saw the title of this I thought, 'Oh no, what have they done now?' ) And *that* was it?!?

My sympathies go out to Ewan and the MIR crew, not receiving future releases from this PR will surely be a tragic blow. Although I'm sure you guys will recover!

By: Ant Carroll

Ant Carroll — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:28:58 +0000

When I saw the title of this I thought, 'Oh no, what have they done now?' ) And *that* was it?!?

My sympathies go out to Ewan and the MIR crew, not receiving future releases from this PR will surely be a tragic blow. Although I'm sure you guys will recover!

By: Ben Smith

Ben Smith — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:44:43 +0000

But what's even sensitive – it's a standard footer. Which client would be upset by that?

By: PatrickatJPR

PatrickatJPR — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:42:45 +0000

What a crazy, over the top reaction from Coracle. As Vikki says – if it's too sensitive to have published, don't send it.

By: Vikki Chowney

Vikki Chowney — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:32:19 +0000

I'm utterly incredulous that someone would proactively email you to remove a PR's contact details from your post. Those details are there to assist anyone reading said information – journalist or otherwise.

There is no way that an agency should be sending *anything* in an email that they shouldn't be happy to be printed. Maybe it's a lesson to them that they shouldn't be delivering 'news' a blanket mailing list.

By: Kip Hakes

Kip Hakes — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:56:18 +0000

I also pity the foo' who messes with Ewan