Comments on: MIR’s Twitter ROI statistics http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Michael E. Rubin http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-244507 Michael E. Rubin Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:00:09 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15719#comment-244507 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Here's an interesting take on Twitter ROI. Would love to see numbers for a large corporate Twitter account. http://is.gd/qHiQ</span> <div class="topsy_trackback_links">[<a href="http://twitter.com/merubin/status/1451131016">Original tweet</a>, <a href="http://topsy.com/tb/www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html">Topsy page</a>]</div></span> Here’s an interesting take on Twitter ROI. Would love to see numbers for a large corporate Twitter account. http://is.gd/qHiQ

[Original tweet, Topsy page]

]]> By: Michael E. Rubin http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-246679 Michael E. Rubin Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:00:09 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15719#comment-246679 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Here's an interesting take on Twitter ROI. Would love to see numbers for a large corporate Twitter account. http://is.gd/qHiQ</span></span> Here’s an interesting take on Twitter ROI. Would love to see numbers for a large corporate Twitter account. http://is.gd/qHiQ

]]> By: TerenceEden http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-243052 TerenceEden Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:48:06 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15719#comment-243052 7% on such a small sample size is probably well within the margin of error. However, it does show you why twitter spam is so prevalent. People click links from those they trust. 7% on such a small sample size is probably well within the margin of error. However, it does show you why twitter spam is so prevalent. People click links from those they trust.

]]> By: Rax Lakhani http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-243051 Rax Lakhani Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:17:35 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15719#comment-243051 Twitter's one of the biggest traffic referrers to my blog. But you have to mix it up a bit on the MIR side. Not just automated links to your posts. How about a bit o' chat? That's what RSS is for. That said, I usually click through when @MIReview tweets.<br><br>How's all this going to change next month? Are you keeping the MIReview account? Twitter's one of the biggest traffic referrers to my blog. But you have to mix it up a bit on the MIR side. Not just automated links to your posts. How about a bit o' chat? That's what RSS is for. That said, I usually click through when @MIReview tweets.

How's all this going to change next month? Are you keeping the MIReview account?

]]> By: TerenceEden http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/mirs_twitter_roi_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-237746 TerenceEden Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:48:06 +0000 http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15719#comment-237746 7% on such a small sample size is probably well within the margin of error. However, it does show you why twitter spam is so prevalent. People click links from those they trust. 7% on such a small sample size is probably well within the margin of error. However, it does show you why twitter spam is so prevalent. People click links from those they trust.

]]>