Joking right?

Sod that. IMHO No website is worth a subscription.

Shame, used to enjoy the site.

Have fun.

Joking right?

Sod that. IMHO No website is worth a subscription.

Shame, used to enjoy the site.

Have fun.

Congrats on the acquisition .. but it looks like the price will be a deterrent for me. If your product manager is paying attention to this thread, do add a +1 to your “loss prospect” list.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=56667173298

Thanks to Ewan for okaying it!

K

Also: If you still wanted to discuss this, I'm on 07769 658104 — except not today as I left that one in a client office. But get me on IM ewanmacleod@hotmail.com or ewanmacleod@gmail.com

On behalf of all of us, good luck to Ewan as he embarks on his new venture.

In less than 10 days time there will be no way for any of us to stay in contact, to continue discussing the mobile industry or cross-promote each others services and products. As Ewan and his new paymaster don't seem to have any desire or need to keep this group of readers together, it seems we need to say a final goodbye,… or find an alternative means of communicating and networking.

Initially we have 9 days so need something temporary to group all our names and contact details together. Going forward maybe there is something fancier we can do.

I am not going to put forward a mechanism yet as I would like to see if there are any backers and also to get a response from Ewan on such a concept.

steve/iTAGG

I have enjoyed reading MIR (and watching some video presentations). What I fail to understand is the sudden dump of news to your viewers/followers that the decision is made – final.

It is extremely difficult to monetise any blog and I do understand with your industry focus it is more difficult to gain advertising revenue when it is a pure B2B community.

If 'ocifant' is correct in his presumption that you are hired with your property (I wish you luck) I can see that you will need to drop your other consulting work and focus on the new company, and if they are feeding you 12K a month -then go ahead – they are paying you to enjoy yourself.

I am sure you will be able to bring in consultants to extend the interview/review aspects on MIR video – and hopefully these will be the same good eggs that have made the previous MIR videos entertaining..

Hope everything goes well with this move.

Ewan had a very expensive blogging hobby. He paid for a few friends to enjoy it with him, and to extend the hobby somewhat. Lots of other people were entertained and educated by watching Ewan and Friends while they enjoyed their hobby. No-one wanted to pay for Ewan to enjoy his hobby.
Ewan now has a job, essentially doing what he used to do in his hobby, but his friends can no longer join in as his employers only have the one job vacancy, and don't want him to have any work-related hobbies (I'm sure my contract of Employment has a similar clause in it somewhere!)

So we all lose out.

Ewan, if I'm right, then I apologise for my previous critical comments. I hope you enjoy the benefits of your new job.

I read The Guardian because even though it's got advertisments for financial services, it at least is still prepared to call out Barclays Bank on an alleged tax dodge scam.

Readers gravitate to good editorial and appreciate that advertisers support that.

There's also a difference between consumer tech news (gadgets & apps) and industry tech news. MIR coverage stradles both areas, which I like as a general interest reader, but is possibly harder to commercialize.

When SMS Text news became MIR Ewan should probably have got a direct sales person on the case right away. Even a few grand here and there at regular intervals makes a difference and you can start building commercial product around independent, quality, content. It is not easy.

What company's gonna invest serious cash in a vehicle that may promote the competition and bag your own gear? When you have a hundred gadget blogs dead keen to review your new schwag, why pay?

Who benefits from the straight talk? We the consumers. Is there a model reliant on us to get value by contributing cash? Nope. Proved that myself last week.

Yes, a few PR budgets could have funded MIR, but convincing the PR advisors that is a good idea is like asking the chicken to suggest a good axe shop nearby. They will always say “nah, stick with us and we'll find someone who's free”.

/m

Trade publishing (call it blogging, if you like) is a difficult business. If companies want coverage (obviously they do to judge from the amount of PRs in the world) there should be some way of supporting the media that provides it. Basically, you have to have a pay to play element.

It gets difficult because media should be independent, otherwise people won't read it, and then more difficult because advertisers are not comfortable with too much straight talk, which is what makes MIR interesting and readable.

Paid research is a better model, because people actually want to pay to be told stuff straight. The catch here is you have to be good.

I am astounded (still) that comanies pay way more for PR to “place” them in media than they do to actually support media directly.

“What is bugging me (or at least has been until today) is who on earth would have bought the rights? What content was it they were actually interested in and at what price?”
EWAN: I can't disclose the name of the company. The content they're interested in is as I set out on the post above – news, analysis, perspective, bit of video, with a bent toward their particular operating industry.

“In other words the only major value I can see in the MIR content is that of the video which is after all the most costly thing to produce.”
EWAN: No. They value written content with a focus on reports discussing specific areas.

“I was kind of under the impression that like so many others James, Ben & Dan had given their time and efforts freely (or at least without being paid) to help create the MIR shows. If James is moving on does this mean the others will follow? Is this the end of the MIR show?”
EWAN: In most cases, James Ben and Dan gave their time for free and I paid for all expenses. e.g. They didn't pay anything when we went to Rome etc. This is indeed the end of the MIR Show as you know it, but James, Ben and Dan are free to do as they wish.

“Ewan talks about the new subscription model in “we” and “our” terms but will there even be a team to back him up?”
EWAN: Yes. I'm hiring some report writers and researchers. I can't afford to hire any of the contributors on their market rates — and I don't think they'd be into this sort of thing even if I could.

“Did they get a pay day, should they have stood to gain financially from the changes, they were of course the creatives behind the content?”
EWAN: Did Ben Dan and James get a pay day? I think you've entirely mis-read the reality. They were giving their time for free and I was paying their expenses. I was paying for absolutely everything and I couldn't find a model that would allow me to continue to do so without stressing. To be clear I spent 33k in January alone on MIR. Me. We had the occasional supporter/advertiser, but it was me who funded it all. So we're not talking in terms of gaining financially. The financial gain I get from this 'transaction' is that I stop spending so much per month.

“Personally I can understand a move to a subscription model in part but seriously doubt that in its current form and without the support and goodwill of the community (who if they are like me feel a little deflated) I can’t see the “phenomenal reach” that is promised to would be subscribers.”
EWAN: The current form of MIR ends next week. The client doesn't want the community. They want reports, they want a bit of news and analysis, they want some sit down video interviews. They don't want MIR in it's current form.

“There are a number of other questions running around my head mostly to do with the viability of the subscription strategy and Ewan’s ability to deliver but that can wait for another post methinks.”
EWAN: My ability to deliver? Alas, the failure point was mine for assuming (and quite possibly delving in to that horrible, horrible no man's land of 'hoping') that the industry — or the readers, working for huge, huge budget-rich companies — would value our output enough to help out now and again. That's where I got it wrong, so I accept any criticism you'd care to level at me in this regard.

Just in case you're not quite there with the reality — can I draw your attention to the post asking for assistance to help take the team to CTIA in Las Vegas. The first time I've really ever asked for support. Having spent upwards of, I don't know, 60k this year inc. Mobile World Congress, I thought, 'surely, surely someone or a few companies will help out.'

I got 11 responses to the post within 48 hours. Every single one said words to the effect of, 'sorry, no budget to help out, but could the team interview us on camera?'

So when you allude to the support, goodwill and such of the MIR community, we have to be very, very clear — British Airways won't accept that in return for flights. That's the reality and I had to operate within it.

To your points on the subscription strategy, Barney, the transaction works fully with one subscriber, no further subscribers are required. So in that context I'm pleased that it's a done deal, I can relax, I can stop spending so much money and so much unpaid time on MIR. If in 3 years time, the client is unwilling to renew, then I'll stop providing a service.

Your comments relating to James and/or Jonathan heading off to the Cayman Islands with their proceeds — well, that would be just phenomenal if I'd done a deal to sell MIR to News Corporation for $500m and hired the entire team on $10m 3-year talent contracts. I'd have loved to have been able to do so. Alas that isn't anywhere near the case.

Somebody has to pay. It was me — and I reached the end of 'reasonable' and found an exit. Don't forget the MIR team who also helped produce the site — don't forget that they were gracious enough to accept expenses and/or contribute their time for no direct recompense. I think your efforts on-going would be better served in thanking them for their efforts and supporting their next projects.

I'll be posting a note to this effect, in more detail, later on.

(In an effort to ensure content remains public the rest of my thinking is on my blog which I have no intention of having you lot subscribe to for – well no more than £250 a month!)

“Now that the dust has settled and my mind is free enough of normal and important things to offer up some attention to this I think I can see what’s been bugging me about this whole affair….” continued at http://www.exponere.com/2009/the-mir-fallout/

I can't see how MIR will make money from subscriptions and will the industry react differently if MIR conversations/discussions are not made available to the public?