<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia&#8217;s Maemo: 43% of mobile developers in favour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adsl viettel</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/comment-page-1#comment-248426</link>
		<dc:creator>adsl viettel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17261#comment-248426</guid>
		<description>of course this figure is very exciting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course this figure is very exciting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickso</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/comment-page-1#comment-248417</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17261#comment-248417</guid>
		<description>I guess the majority of the developers being asked were from the US? Wasnt meant as a form of criticism in any way, just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the majority of the developers being asked were from the US? Wasnt meant as a form of criticism in any way, just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADSL Viettel</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/comment-page-1#comment-248413</link>
		<dc:creator>ADSL Viettel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17261#comment-248413</guid>
		<description>that exciting number</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that exciting number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/comment-page-1#comment-248410</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17261#comment-248410</guid>
		<description>Never fear Alex, they&#039;re absolutely delighted with the report and the workshop we delivered. The polarisation that you speak of is exactly what they specified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never fear Alex, they&#39;re absolutely delighted with the report and the workshop we delivered. The polarisation that you speak of is exactly what they specified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/nokias_maemo_43_of_mobile_developers_in_favour.html/comment-page-1#comment-248409</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17261#comment-248409</guid>
		<description>Leaving aside criticism of the tiny poll size, why were people only given black and white options - &quot;love it&quot; or &quot;crap&quot; (ignoring the don&#039;t cares which are fair enough). Are people not allowed to be somewhere in between? How about other options for e.g. &quot;I&#039;ll see how it goes, Nokia have lost my confidence a bit but I&#039;m prepared to try them again&quot; and &quot;It&#039;s not VERY exciting, but I think it looks fairly promising and I&#039;m fairly optimistic about it&#039;s chances and will give it a shot unless they do another big screw-up&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&gt; Right now 56% of mobile developers questioned have a directly negative or irrelevant perspective on Maemo.&lt;br&gt;May I dare to suggest if you&#039;d added more options you would have got considerably less blatantly negative ones. Or possibly less blatantly positive ones. Either way, more accuracy = more truth.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I fear for any conclusions this investment bank makes on the back of your survey. Is it not somewhat your responsibility to not feed these blind people (i.e. lacking in knowledge of the subject area) skewed information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaving aside criticism of the tiny poll size, why were people only given black and white options &#8211; &#8220;love it&#8221; or &#8220;crap&#8221; (ignoring the don&#39;t cares which are fair enough). Are people not allowed to be somewhere in between? How about other options for e.g. &#8220;I&#39;ll see how it goes, Nokia have lost my confidence a bit but I&#39;m prepared to try them again&#8221; and &#8220;It&#39;s not VERY exciting, but I think it looks fairly promising and I&#39;m fairly optimistic about it&#39;s chances and will give it a shot unless they do another big screw-up&#8221;.</p>
<p>&gt; Right now 56% of mobile developers questioned have a directly negative or irrelevant perspective on Maemo.<br />May I dare to suggest if you&#39;d added more options you would have got considerably less blatantly negative ones. Or possibly less blatantly positive ones. Either way, more accuracy = more truth.</p>
<p>I fear for any conclusions this investment bank makes on the back of your survey. Is it not somewhat your responsibility to not feed these blind people (i.e. lacking in knowledge of the subject area) skewed information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

