<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radio 1 Free MMS day: Great idea, 3 years too late</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raid Recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-250621</link>
		<dc:creator>Raid Recovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-250621</guid>
		<description>nice to watch this video which has clearly explained that how to send MMS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice to watch this video which has clearly explained that how to send MMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248687</guid>
		<description>I shall take a look, very cool indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall take a look, very cool indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamessimcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248686</link>
		<dc:creator>jamessimcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248686</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear, we do try our best.  See what we did with the pics that came in:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;br&gt;(we&#039;ll have a version of this on the mobile version of the site @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1&lt;/a&gt; next week)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear, we do try our best.  See what we did with the pics that came in:  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/</a>   <br />(we&#39;ll have a version of this on the mobile version of the site @ <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1</a> next week)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248685</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248685</guid>
		<description>Well I think the BBC is a shining light in an often  mediocre interactive industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the BBC is a shining light in an often  mediocre interactive industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamessimcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248684</link>
		<dc:creator>jamessimcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248684</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly comment on that... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#39;t possibly comment on that&#8230; <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248683</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248683</guid>
		<description>Nice one James -- thank you for taking the time to reply.   I was not attacking the BBC&#039;s participation -- instead, the absolutely ridiculous efforts of the mobile industry to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one James &#8212; thank you for taking the time to reply.   I was not attacking the BBC&#39;s participation &#8212; instead, the absolutely ridiculous efforts of the mobile industry to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248650</guid>
		<description>I shall take a look, very cool indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shall take a look, very cool indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamessimcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248649</link>
		<dc:creator>jamessimcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248649</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear, we do try our best.  See what we did with the pics that came in:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;br&gt;(we&#039;ll have a version of this on the mobile version of the site @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1&lt;/a&gt; next week)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear, we do try our best.  See what we did with the pics that came in:  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/accessallareas/</a>   <br />(we&#39;ll have a version of this on the mobile version of the site @ <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/mobile/radio1</a> next week)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248648</guid>
		<description>Well I think the BBC is a shining light in an often  mediocre interactive industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the BBC is a shining light in an often  mediocre interactive industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamessimcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248647</link>
		<dc:creator>jamessimcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248647</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly comment on that... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#39;t possibly comment on that&#8230; <img src='http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248646</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248646</guid>
		<description>Nice one James -- thank you for taking the time to reply.   I was not attacking the BBC&#039;s participation -- instead, the absolutely ridiculous efforts of the mobile industry to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one James &#8212; thank you for taking the time to reply.   I was not attacking the BBC&#39;s participation &#8212; instead, the absolutely ridiculous efforts of the mobile industry to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Simcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-253547</link>
		<dc:creator>James Simcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-253547</guid>
		<description>Surprised to see this rant popping up higher than the BBC&#039;s own page about this initiative in Google search, and as a BBC employee who helped work on this, I thought I ought to respond to some of the points you raise.

&quot;Just to be clear: You’ll be billed for sending MMS messages to anyone else. It’s only free to Radio 1 on that day.  Which, frankly, is a fat lot of good for the wider consumer&quot;.

Radio 1 reaches millions of people every day, a majority of which you may describe as &quot;Normobs&quot;.  There are of course some smartphone users, who like myself, have been emailing photos and uploading to the web for years - some of those long before the arrival of the iPhone and Android devices (are they &quot;Abnormobs&quot;?), but a lot of those folks (as you recognise in your post) don&#039;t know if they have the right settings and often don&#039;t even how to send a photo over the air.

As a public service, the BBC has to do it&#039;s best to reach the widest possible audience - and helping show the less-technically savvy what is possible from their phones, beyond voice and SMS seemed like a pretty worthy thing to do.  Throughout the day on Radio 1 we had presenters explaining how to send MMS and how to check their settings, and with any luck, there&#039;s now a lot more people in the UK starting to unlock a little more of the &#039;potential in their pockets&#039;.

&quot;but when I take a 5 megapixel image and transmit it to your bollocks shitty small-screened Nokia 3600, yeah… the experience isn’t going to be very good at all&quot;.

Most mobile phones will give you the option to reduce the image size when sending an MMS to ensure it will be receivable at the other end.  Sending 5 megapixel images is a bit pointless if the intention is to view on a screen that&#039;s less than 1 megapixel, no?  Sure, it might be worthwhile if you&#039;re uploading to a photo sharing website, but that&#039;s a whole other level from the basic digital literacy this initiative was trying to help.  &quot;Bollocks, shitty Nokia 3600&quot;?  if all you knew how to do was call people or drop them a text, then actually this might seem an ideal little handset.  Battery lasts way longer than an iPhone, it&#039;s far simpler to setup and make calls and much less likely to shatter when accidentally dropped.  It&#039;s also a lot cheaper - and price is the most important factor when choosing a phone for a lot of people.

&quot;Most reasonably modern handsets automatically acquire and select the relevant MMS/data gateways. But I meet too many normobs who ‘haven’t got MMS setup’ or who tell me that ‘it’s never worked for me’.&quot; 

Settings are still a problem for many.  Take a previously contract handset and swap in a PAYG sim for instance and chances are your settings won&#039;t work anymore.  Getsettings.org is a great idea therefore (although disappointed to see it&#039;s not really functional from a basic mobile browser).

What was really interesting about the day, was watching the 10s of thousands of photos arrive and reading the comments that came with them.  If you send an SMS to a friend or family member, then they know you, and don&#039;t need to see your face to understand your sentiment.  For me the greatest learning of the day was to see how much more powerful shortform communication can be when you can see the sender&#039;s face.  It&#039;s obvious really, mankind has had millions of years of communicating face to face, as opposed to more like 12 years of relying on 160 chars of thumbed abbreviations to get your point across.

Maybe this was too late for those who&#039;ve already purchased flat-rate data tariffs and are happily seeing their mobile devices as an extension of their online experience - but not every one sees the value in that yet, and I like to think we (and the MDA) might have helped just a little bit.



 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised to see this rant popping up higher than the BBC&#8217;s own page about this initiative in Google search, and as a BBC employee who helped work on this, I thought I ought to respond to some of the points you raise.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just to be clear: You’ll be billed for sending MMS messages to anyone else. It’s only free to Radio 1 on that day.  Which, frankly, is a fat lot of good for the wider consumer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Radio 1 reaches millions of people every day, a majority of which you may describe as &#8220;Normobs&#8221;.  There are of course some smartphone users, who like myself, have been emailing photos and uploading to the web for years &#8211; some of those long before the arrival of the iPhone and Android devices (are they &#8220;Abnormobs&#8221;?), but a lot of those folks (as you recognise in your post) don&#8217;t know if they have the right settings and often don&#8217;t even how to send a photo over the air.</p>
<p>As a public service, the BBC has to do it&#8217;s best to reach the widest possible audience &#8211; and helping show the less-technically savvy what is possible from their phones, beyond voice and SMS seemed like a pretty worthy thing to do.  Throughout the day on Radio 1 we had presenters explaining how to send MMS and how to check their settings, and with any luck, there&#8217;s now a lot more people in the UK starting to unlock a little more of the &#8216;potential in their pockets&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;but when I take a 5 megapixel image and transmit it to your bollocks shitty small-screened Nokia 3600, yeah… the experience isn’t going to be very good at all&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most mobile phones will give you the option to reduce the image size when sending an MMS to ensure it will be receivable at the other end.  Sending 5 megapixel images is a bit pointless if the intention is to view on a screen that&#8217;s less than 1 megapixel, no?  Sure, it might be worthwhile if you&#8217;re uploading to a photo sharing website, but that&#8217;s a whole other level from the basic digital literacy this initiative was trying to help.  &#8220;Bollocks, shitty Nokia 3600&#8243;?  if all you knew how to do was call people or drop them a text, then actually this might seem an ideal little handset.  Battery lasts way longer than an iPhone, it&#8217;s far simpler to setup and make calls and much less likely to shatter when accidentally dropped.  It&#8217;s also a lot cheaper &#8211; and price is the most important factor when choosing a phone for a lot of people.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most reasonably modern handsets automatically acquire and select the relevant MMS/data gateways. But I meet too many normobs who ‘haven’t got MMS setup’ or who tell me that ‘it’s never worked for me’.&#8221; </p>
<p>Settings are still a problem for many.  Take a previously contract handset and swap in a PAYG sim for instance and chances are your settings won&#8217;t work anymore.  Getsettings.org is a great idea therefore (although disappointed to see it&#8217;s not really functional from a basic mobile browser).</p>
<p>What was really interesting about the day, was watching the 10s of thousands of photos arrive and reading the comments that came with them.  If you send an SMS to a friend or family member, then they know you, and don&#8217;t need to see your face to understand your sentiment.  For me the greatest learning of the day was to see how much more powerful shortform communication can be when you can see the sender&#8217;s face.  It&#8217;s obvious really, mankind has had millions of years of communicating face to face, as opposed to more like 12 years of relying on 160 chars of thumbed abbreviations to get your point across.</p>
<p>Maybe this was too late for those who&#8217;ve already purchased flat-rate data tariffs and are happily seeing their mobile devices as an extension of their online experience &#8211; but not every one sees the value in that yet, and I like to think we (and the MDA) might have helped just a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamessimcock</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248635</link>
		<dc:creator>jamessimcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248635</guid>
		<description>Surprised to see this rant popping up higher than the BBC&#039;s own page about this initiative in Google search, and as a BBC employee who helped work on this, I thought I ought to respond to some of the points you raise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Just to be clear: YouÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll be billed for sending MMS messages to anyone else. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s only free to Radio 1 on that day.  Which, frankly, is a fat lot of good for the wider consumer&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Radio 1 reaches millions of people every day, a majority of which you may describe as &quot;Normobs&quot;.  There are of course some smartphone users, who like myself, have been emailing photos and uploading to the web for years - some of those long before the arrival of the iPhone and Android devices (are they &quot;Abnormobs&quot;?), but a lot of those folks (as you recognise in your post) don&#039;t know if they have the right settings and often don&#039;t even how to send a photo over the air.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a public service, the BBC has to do it&#039;s best to reach the widest possible audience - and helping show the less-technically savvy what is possible from their phones, beyond voice and SMS seemed like a pretty worthy thing to do.  Throughout the day on Radio 1 we had presenters explaining how to send MMS and how to check their settings, and with any luck, there&#039;s now a lot more people in the UK starting to unlock a little more of the &#039;potential in their pockets&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;but when I take a 5 megapixel image and transmit it to your bollocks shitty small-screened Nokia 3600, yeahÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ the experience isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t going to be very good at all&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most mobile phones will give you the option to reduce the image size when sending an MMS to ensure it will be receivable at the other end.  Sending 5 megapixel images is a bit pointless if the intention is to view on a screen that&#039;s less than 1 megapixel, no?  Sure, it might be worthwhile if you&#039;re uploading to a photo sharing website, but that&#039;s a whole other level from the basic digital literacy this initiative was trying to help.  &quot;Bollocks, shitty Nokia 3600&quot;?  if all you knew how to do was call people or drop them a text, then actually this might seem an ideal little handset.  Battery lasts way longer than an iPhone, it&#039;s far simpler to setup and make calls and much less likely to shatter when accidentally dropped.  It&#039;s also a lot cheaper - and price is the most important factor when choosing a phone for a lot of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Most reasonably modern handsets automatically acquire and select the relevant MMS/data gateways. But I meet too many normobs who Ã¢â‚¬ËœhavenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t got MMS setupÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ or who tell me that Ã¢â‚¬ËœitÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s never worked for meÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Settings are still a problem for many.  Take a previously contract handset and swap in a PAYG sim for instance and chances are your settings won&#039;t work anymore.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://Getsettings.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Getsettings.org&lt;/a&gt; is a great idea therefore (although disappointed to see it&#039;s not really functional from a basic mobile browser).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What was really interesting about the day, was watching the 10s of thousands of photos arrive and reading the comments that came with them.  If you send an SMS to a friend or family member, then they know you, and don&#039;t need to see your face to understand your sentiment.  For me the greatest learning of the day was to see how much more powerful shortform communication can be when you can see the sender&#039;s face.  It&#039;s obvious really, mankind has had millions of years of communicating face to face, as opposed to more like 12 years of relying on 160 chars of thumbed abbreviations to get your point across.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe this was too late for those who&#039;ve already purchased flat-rate data tariffs and are happily seeing their mobile devices as an extension of their online experience - but not every one sees the value in that yet, and I like to think we (and the MDA) might have helped just a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised to see this rant popping up higher than the BBC&#39;s own page about this initiative in Google search, and as a BBC employee who helped work on this, I thought I ought to respond to some of the points you raise.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just to be clear: YouÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll be billed for sending MMS messages to anyone else. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s only free to Radio 1 on that day.  Which, frankly, is a fat lot of good for the wider consumer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Radio 1 reaches millions of people every day, a majority of which you may describe as &#8220;Normobs&#8221;.  There are of course some smartphone users, who like myself, have been emailing photos and uploading to the web for years &#8211; some of those long before the arrival of the iPhone and Android devices (are they &#8220;Abnormobs&#8221;?), but a lot of those folks (as you recognise in your post) don&#39;t know if they have the right settings and often don&#39;t even how to send a photo over the air.</p>
<p>As a public service, the BBC has to do it&#39;s best to reach the widest possible audience &#8211; and helping show the less-technically savvy what is possible from their phones, beyond voice and SMS seemed like a pretty worthy thing to do.  Throughout the day on Radio 1 we had presenters explaining how to send MMS and how to check their settings, and with any luck, there&#39;s now a lot more people in the UK starting to unlock a little more of the &#39;potential in their pockets&#39;.</p>
<p>&#8220;but when I take a 5 megapixel image and transmit it to your bollocks shitty small-screened Nokia 3600, yeahÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ the experience isnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t going to be very good at all&#8221;.</p>
<p>Most mobile phones will give you the option to reduce the image size when sending an MMS to ensure it will be receivable at the other end.  Sending 5 megapixel images is a bit pointless if the intention is to view on a screen that&#39;s less than 1 megapixel, no?  Sure, it might be worthwhile if you&#39;re uploading to a photo sharing website, but that&#39;s a whole other level from the basic digital literacy this initiative was trying to help.  &#8220;Bollocks, shitty Nokia 3600&#8243;?  if all you knew how to do was call people or drop them a text, then actually this might seem an ideal little handset.  Battery lasts way longer than an iPhone, it&#39;s far simpler to setup and make calls and much less likely to shatter when accidentally dropped.  It&#39;s also a lot cheaper &#8211; and price is the most important factor when choosing a phone for a lot of people.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most reasonably modern handsets automatically acquire and select the relevant MMS/data gateways. But I meet too many normobs who Ã¢â‚¬ËœhavenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t got MMS setupÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ or who tell me that Ã¢â‚¬ËœitÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s never worked for meÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.&#8221; </p>
<p>Settings are still a problem for many.  Take a previously contract handset and swap in a PAYG sim for instance and chances are your settings won&#39;t work anymore.  <a href="http://Getsettings.org" rel="nofollow">Getsettings.org</a> is a great idea therefore (although disappointed to see it&#39;s not really functional from a basic mobile browser).</p>
<p>What was really interesting about the day, was watching the 10s of thousands of photos arrive and reading the comments that came with them.  If you send an SMS to a friend or family member, then they know you, and don&#39;t need to see your face to understand your sentiment.  For me the greatest learning of the day was to see how much more powerful shortform communication can be when you can see the sender&#39;s face.  It&#39;s obvious really, mankind has had millions of years of communicating face to face, as opposed to more like 12 years of relying on 160 chars of thumbed abbreviations to get your point across.</p>
<p>Maybe this was too late for those who&#39;ve already purchased flat-rate data tariffs and are happily seeing their mobile devices as an extension of their online experience &#8211; but not every one sees the value in that yet, and I like to think we (and the MDA) might have helped just a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murat</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248496</link>
		<dc:creator>Murat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248496</guid>
		<description>MMS usage is increasing year on year by MILLIONS. What happened to econmies of scale, why is the price still 35-40p?? Gee let me think of a good way to increase adoption......oh right yeah make it 15p. This issue pisses me off because that price drop enabled more brands/businesses/whoever to get involved and develop some decent stuff around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMS usage is increasing year on year by MILLIONS. What happened to econmies of scale, why is the price still 35-40p?? Gee let me think of a good way to increase adoption&#8230;&#8230;oh right yeah make it 15p. This issue pisses me off because that price drop enabled more brands/businesses/whoever to get involved and develop some decent stuff around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nacho</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/11/radio_1_free_mms_day_great_idea_3_years_too_late.html/comment-page-1#comment-248449</link>
		<dc:creator>nacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=17276#comment-248449</guid>
		<description>MMS? wtf? are we in year 2000? fail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMS? wtf? are we in year 2000? fail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

