Archive for the ‘Case Studies’ Category

Study suggests UK Phone Users send 217 million texts per day

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

I just came across this article on The Daily Telegraph, which says that as per a study conducted among UK’s mobile phone users, the amount of total text messages exchanged every single day counts up to roughly 217 million. Yes, that’s right, 217 MILLION texts in a DAY. The one you just sent a while back could very well be adding up to the total. As compared to the last year, mobile subscribers are sending 60 million more text messages per day.

The study, which was carried out by the Mobile Data Association suggests that the amount of text messages sent in a month could be around 6.5 billion. Along with the text messages, users also send 1.5 million picture messages and video-based text messages every day.

Could this be credited to the fall in tariffs? Or could this because of the evolution of the mobile market as a whole? I sent a total of 433 text messages last month, according to my service provider.

 

 

Company Profile ScreenReach

Sunday, July 27th, 2008

I recently did a little teaser about ScreenReach, which generated a few comments. Well here’s a fuller profile following my conversation with Paul Rawlings, the CEO.

The Company
ScreenReach talks about itself as a ‘Screen 2.0′ company, which means that it offers an interactive display system that can deliver personalised content to screens both big plasma display screens as well as mobiles.

Primarily this personalised content can be external information configured however the screen owner chooses. That could be news, stock market updates or the local weather. In this respect it is a bit like iGoogle for plasmas. The really clever stuff however is the fact that the content can be personalised based on the people near the screen.

The founders of the company come from a signage background and were looking for a way to provide hi-tech, quality display systems for all.

The Technology
In my first piece I talked about ScreenReach bringing the film Minority Report to life. I was referring to the scene in which Tom Cruise walks into a shop and all the screens recognise him and display personal messages just for him. ScreenReach offers something similar, or as Paul puts it, they “utilise location-based data to deliver something useful” to the consumer.

That location based data can be recognising that you as an individual are near the screen, maybe by using Cell-ID, GPS, or if you are close enough Bluetooth. Or it could be data that predicts the make-up of the ‘group’ of people nearby e.g. by accessing the till systems of the retailer to understand who has recently purchased. This information is then used to personalise the content on the screen.

For example, if the system recognised Ewan it might display a notice that said that Irn Bru was on offer, whereas if it recognised me it might display the advert for Custard Creams.

The Business Model
The audience for this technology is as Paul sees it ‘anyone who wants to deliver a message’, but that is mainly retailers or possibly corporate receptions and other similar places.

What ScreenReach is looking to do is to offer this technology to as many people as possible and not keep it in the hands of an exclusive group that can afford to pay big money for traditional quality signage. For that reason the initial costs have been set low (99 for the software, plus a monthly fee based on the content delivered). On top of that, ScreenReach hopes to generate additional advertising revenues with a percentage going to the retailer.

The idea behind all of this is that both the consumer and the retailer can configure the system to deliver the ads / information that they want.

For retailers, this means not running ads that are competitive with their offering and obviously running ads that actively promote their products.

For consumers it will be about setting their own personal preferences. One of the ways that ScreenReach is hoping to entice consumers to do that is through the mobile vouchers scheme that it offers. Consumers can set their preferences and then receive discount vouchers to their phone. These vouchers can be based on both their preferences and the additional information gathered (e.g. location) to make them more relevant.

In many ways this is a location based version of what Shop, Scan, Save offers.

What ScreenReach is hoping is that following launch they will be able to grow rapidly and steal ‘first mover advantage’ becoming the de facto solution for retailers.

Next Steps
So far ScreenReach has been self-funded and is currently talking to VCs so that funding can be provided to launch to the market and grow the service. At present they are trialling the service in a few select places and are hoping that a full launch will see their presence grow.

When I spoke to Paul he was confident about achieving funding and thought that the launch would be in only about 2-3 months.

My View
There were a number of people commenting about this after my teaser. Many pointing out that consumers would not want to be recognised and have ads displayed based on their preferences.

Yet, people already have their preferences played back to them on websites they visit and through any decent example of direct mail. As I said at the time, its all about how it is deployed and I see no immeidate problem with this, if it is done well.

However, what this does highlight is that ScreenReach is at the mercy of other people getting it right whether its the people they sell the system too, or the people who advertise on the screens. As Mike42 said, it wont take many mistakes for this to affect trade in the retail stores and therefore affect ScreenReach.

My other potential problem with this is the ad-funded model. Dont get me wrong, I love the concept of ad-funded, but its just that the world and his dog is now using this as a method to launch new services and advertisers still only have a finite budget. Im not sure how much Coke (or whoever) would value advertising to the people who sit in a small coffee shop in Warrington (or insert your own provincial town here).

Overall though, I hope it does work. It sounds really interesting, although Ive not seen it in practice (Id love to though sometime, if youre listening Paul!!); its good that people from outside the mobile industry are choosing to innovate in this sector; and Paul was really enthusiastic and excited about it all. Now I know that they arent necessarily good enough reasons for a company to survive, but theyre good enough for me to want it to.

I guess well all have to watch this space

The Poor Traits of Social Acceptance

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

Mad_Hatter-02
I have this really bad habit of taking pictures of myself with my phone. I’m not sure why, but I find uses for them all over the internet. You never know when you’ll need a good self picture. I also have a big weakness for hats. I *love* hats.

So I was in Target (yes, I go there often) and found the hats area, and started putting the hats on and making a funny face, snapping pics with my phone. There was only one other person around, and he was on the other end of the Menswear section, so I didn’t worry about it.

However, as I was snapping the pictures and picking through the hats, he somehow snuck up on me, and sauntered over as if he was looking at the hats for himself. For some reason, I immediately became self-conscious, and tried to play it off as though I wasn’t taking silly photos of myself in different hats. However, I noticed that it didn’t sem to phase him in the least bit. He stood there next to me as if every other time he’d shopped, there was some fool snapping pictures in hats.

It really made me wonder how fully-featured cellphones have changed our lives, and altered what is now ’socially acceptable.’ There was a point at which talking on the phone around others was considered extremely rude, and now people do it in movie theatres, at the dinner table, and other completely inappropriate situations. The same goes for taking pictures, apparently. People don’t seem to flinch or look startled when I take pictures of random things around me (such as rhino statues.)

Have you noticed your concept of ’socially acceptable’ changing on account of your mobile? For better or for worse?

3UK’s Mobile Internet Seminar – presentations

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2007

Remember I went to that mobile internet seminar last week (write up here)? Well I have just got hold of the presentations.

So for anyone who’s interested…

Skype

Yahoo! Go

Jaiku, baby

And another, bigger Jaiku one from Jyri because I found it on Slideshare. I love his presentation’s style.

Local council reduces communication costs with text

Monday, June 4th, 2007

Link: Case study: Reduced mobile comms costs at St Edmundsbury Borough Council :: PublicTechnology.net :: e-Government & public sector IT news + job vacancies:

Found this article whilst trawling around the web. It’s quite lengthy, and does concentrate a lot on voice communications – however near the end of the article there’s a couple of paragraphs that talk about text.

Using SMS text messaging, teams in units such as refuse collection and landscaping now communicate with one another to divide work according to location and availability. For example, if one team of refuse collectors does not have capacity to remove all of the rubbish from a given site, they send a text message to another team requesting assistance.

As Mr Brindle says, ‘Many of our services have really improved as a result of greater collaboration between our mobile workers. Using SMS has not only increased efficiency but it is also a very quick and cost-effective form of communication.”

There doesn’t appear to be an application involved as such, just mobile to mobile text. Still, it’s good to see that the public sector is finally realising the power of SMS.

Is Premium SMS dead? (part 1)

Tuesday, May 15th, 2007

It’s been a rough old ride for the world of premium SMS of late. What with the numerous scandals involving TV channels, Vodafone having a couple of overcharging problems, ICSTIS adjudications and fines on the increase and public trust in the industry at an all time low, I’m wondering whether this is the end of premium SMS as we know it.

Over the next few weeks, I’ll be writing some blog posts about the subject, with examples of how they do things in other countries, talking about how the industry can clean up it’s act, what ICSTIS plan for the future, and other related subjects. I’d welcome your feedback, whether you’re a consumer, aggregator, service provider, or just have something to say on the subject.

I’ll skip the history lesson and assume everyone knows the basics of how premium SMS works, what shortcodes are, and so on and so forth. Today’s case study is of a competition campaign for Coca Cola’s Dr Pepper brand, as I just happen to have a bottle in front of me. We’ll be comparing it to a similar competition for ITV’s popular soap Coronation Street.

The bottle gives me a chance to win ‘the ultimate Wii games room’, including a 26″ LCD TV, mini-fridge full of soft drinks, and of course the aforementioned Nintendo Wii. I can enter the competition via SMS, or just go to their website. I chose the SMS option, otherwise this would be a very short blog entry!

To enter, I just texted the unique code inside my bottle to a shortcode. That cost me my normal network rates (10-12p according to the label). This is what I got back:

Wicked. So I’m in the draw for today, and I’ve got a discount code to save some cash on some PS3 games (yes I’ve blurred the code, have to get your own!). It’s a free to user text, and Coca Cola have picked up the tab. I’ve so far spent just my normal network text rate.

Then, a few seconds later, I got another text. Although it’s from a shortcode, again it’s a free to user text:

I’ve not got a problem with being asked for my details, and don’t think this is pushy at all. My mobile number hasn’t been opted in yet, and if I don’t want to get more info I’ll just ignore it.

My point in all this? I’ve entered a competition to win about £1k worth of stuff, and it’s cost me just one text. Not one text plus 25p, or 50p, or £1.50. Just 10p inc VAT, in my case. Coca Cola haven’t got anything out of me, like permission to market to me or anything, but I’m in with a chance to win some cool stuff.

Let’s look at the other side of the coin. A quick Google through the net, and I found the terms and conditions for an ITV Coronation Street competition, where I could win a 32″ TV, a DVD recorder and a DVD box set. Ok so it’s a little bit more than what I could win with Dr Pepper, but look at how different it is:

1.4 Entry to the competition is by SMS only. Entrants are required to send a text to 63337 with the keyword QUIZ. The charge per text message will be £1 plus up to 7 messages at standard network charge. The total cost will therefore be dependent on the entrant’s network.

£1 *plus* up to seven standard texts? That’s going to be nearly £2 by the time I finish. Reckon they’ll ask me if I want to opt-in to receive marketing texts? Not according to this, they won’t:

3.2 Any personal data will only otherwise be used in accordance with ITV’s privacy policy and the Promoter’s (where different). ITV’s privacy policy can be viewed at http://www.itv.com/. ITV will only use an entrant’s personal data to send information of offers or services that may be of interest to that entrant from time to time by email, SMS or post or pass that entrant’s data to carefully selected third parties in accordance with the marketing preferences that the entrant has selected. To opt-out of receiving any marketing communications from ITV, entrants can amend their marketing preferences at any time by sending an email by going to www.itv.com/itvi/help or calling 0845 055 0011 and giving their name, email address or responding to the opt-out mechanisms in the relevant communication itself. To opt-out of receiving any further communications from third party companies, entrants should contact them directly.

So unlike Coca Cola who’ve asked me if I want my personal data used, ITV *will* use my personal data, give it out to anyone that wants it, *and* charge me nearly £2 for the privilege? What absolute rubbish. I’m sure this breaks some rules somewhere or other. Guess which providers are running this? Yep, MIG and Eckoh. Those are two names we’ve heard a lot about lately, and it ain’t been good..

Anyway, to sum up, in my opinion Coca Cola know how to treat their consumers, and ITV haven’t got the foggiest. The problem is that certain broadcasters are using their immense audience reach to try and screw as much money out of their viewers as possible – at least until the new ICSTIS Guidelines get approved and come into effect. Until them, it appears to be a free for all in the attempt to prop up falling advertising revenues by fleecing consumers.

Case Study: A look at Esendex

Thursday, May 10th, 2007

Continuing the SMS Text News send-us-a-case-study campaign, today I am pleased to feature UK located company, Esendex. Here’s co-founder, Adam Bird with an overview:

- – - – - -

Esendex has always been about business sms services. We deliver SMS services as a utility that businesses use alongside telephone, fax and email to enable them to conduct their business efficiently and cost-effectively. Our focus has always been on providing reliable, performant message using national carriers.

Playing by the rules is important if you are in this for the long run and want to build a real business. To a certain extent this means a hard slog to reach critical mass. In the early days customers didn’t expect too much but increasingly businesses are looking for levels of support and security of supply consistent with their other business communication channels.

I guess we built the company in our own image. I came from an enterprise development background, Julian from the utility sector and we just thought about doing things in the best way possible. There have definately been times where we wished perhaps we a little more fast and loose, but we’re really bad blaggers and probably couldn’t have carried it off.

In a recent customer survey, 93% of respondents were very satisfied with the service they received from Esendex, with reliability being cited as the most valued aspect of our service. Must have something to do with the team of technical experts, passionate about availability and performance, who monitor and maintain our systems 24 x 365.

All this is very laudable but not particularly exciting, which was the feedback during one of our PR flirtations over the past few years. The really interesting stuff, the stuff that’s makes people understand what we do at parties, are the case studies.

In the early days this was also the education challenge, “so SMS is for kids or for spamming people, why on earth would I use it in my business?”

Both RAC Autowindscreens and NTL (Virgin Media as they are now) use our system to manage their mobile workers, sending and receiving job information. Which has meant saving money on voice calls and dispatch staff at the same time.

In NTL’s case we have developed and host a bespoke application that manages job workflow all via SMS which has recently been rolled out to a number of other departments. We’ve also developed service checkers that confirm service availability for a given postcode, locations of local exchanges and switch gear, and a whole host of other services that bring enterprise data into the moble arena.

Another service I’m particularly proud of is the Car Data Check service we run for Experian. Taking a registration number for a car via text, matching that against Experian’s vast motor and insurance database and sending a report of the vehicle’s history and likely concerns via text. Once this service was live we then added in a Parkers valuation, gave it the keyword PRICE on 80806, and a very successful consumer service was born.

The great thing about all these services is they seed ideas among the rest of our customers and the business community as a whole. My personal view is that we have still along way to go with SMS and mobile messaging in general. It will become as pervasive as telephone, email and fax but in ways we’re only just imagining.

Adam Bird
Esendex
Email: adam.bird at esendex.com
Call: +44 115 852 5758
Text: +44 7800 140716

- – - – - -

Adam, thanks for taking the time to write! Fascinating!

Text helps push up bra sales

Wednesday, May 9th, 2007

I’m seeing more and more commercials on TV lately that encourage me to text a number to receive more info. For instance, I can request information on a new car, joining the army, and now get the latest on a range of lingerie – courtesy of TXT4 and bra manufacturer Bravissimo.

Here’s something interesting though. The TV advert (pictured) featured phone and website calls to action, as well as the text number you can see in the screen grab. In terms of response, SMS came out top, with 45% of the total consumer response coming in through the shortcode. In addition, it’s helped Bravissimo measure the return on investment for their campaign.

Jo Lee, marketing director at Bravissimo, explains ‘Assigning a unique keyword to each advertising placement across all media channels enables us to see exactly where leads come from to help determine how successful each has been in generating response. In addition profiling respondents gives valuable insights into the types of consumers we’re successfully attracting and also allows us to better analyse the impact of individual TV and radio spot times. This is valuable information when planning future campaigns. ”

Interesting stuff. Apparently the word on the street is that mobile marketing in the retail sector is going to be the big thing for the rest of the year.

TXT4’s CEO Tim Carrigan says: ‘Of the 230 major brand campaigns we currently manage, from global automotive manufacturers to travel companies, 80% of them use SMS for handling brochure requests. Companies see a dramatic uplift in response as a result of providing consumers with a quick and easy way of responding from anywhere, at anytime. Not only does this capture consumer interest at the very point they see the advertising, but automating the process provides high quality data capture while significantly reducing handling costs.”

80% is a fantastic figure, so congrats to Tim and everyone at TXT4. Any offers of scantily clad women in underwear always welcome.. :)


Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter