<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; 2009-compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/2009-compared/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ewan MacLeod: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Twitter&#8217;s grown 1,689% from February 2008 to February 2009 compared to FB&#8217;s 114% growth. Someone&#8217;s been eating their Weetabix&#8230;Ã¢â‚¬Â (via FriendFeed)</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/ewan_macleod_twitters_grown_1689_from_february_2008_to_february_2009_compared_to_fbs_114_growth_someones_been_eating_their_weetabix_via_friendfeed.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/ewan_macleod_twitters_grown_1689_from_february_2008_to_february_2009_compared_to_fbs_114_growth_someones_been_eating_their_weetabix_via_friendfeed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-compared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been-eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[date-with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ewan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knows-your]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snot-doing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[something-similar-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unless-you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weetabix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weetabix-]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/ewan_macleod_twitters_grown_1689_from_february_2008_to_february_2009_compared_to_fbs_114_growth_someones_been_eating_their_weetabix_via_friendfeed.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Ewan MacLeod Ã¢â‚¬Å“Twitter&#039;s grown 1,689% from February 2008 to February 2009 compared to FB&#039;s 114% growth. Someone&#039;s been eating their Weetabix...Ã¢â‚¬Â March 17 at 5:22 pm - Comment - Like &#039;snot doing bad that Twitter - Ewan MacLeod ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ewan MacLeod Ã¢â‚¬Å“Twitter&#039;s grown 1,689% from February 2008 to February 2009 compared to FB&#039;s 114% growth. Someone&#039;s been eating their Weetabix&#8230;Ã¢â‚¬Â March 17 at 5:22 pm &#8211; Comment &#8211; Like &#039;snot doing bad that Twitter &#8211; Ewan MacLeod </p>
<p><img src="http://friendfeed.com/static/images/icons/internal.png" /></p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://friendfeed.com/e/46f114de-95e7-df2f-cb8f-022253f24eef/Twitter-s-grown-1-689-from-February-2008-to/" title="Ewan MacLeod: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Twitter's grown 1,689% from February 2008 to February 2009 compared to FB's 114% growth. Someone's been eating their Weetabix...Ã¢â‚¬Â (via FriendFeed)">Ewan MacLeod: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Twitter&#8217;s grown 1,689% from February 2008 to February 2009 compared to FB&#8217;s 114% growth. Someone&#8217;s been eating their Weetabix&#8230;Ã¢â‚¬Â (via FriendFeed)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/03/ewan_macleod_twitters_grown_1689_from_february_2008_to_february_2009_compared_to_fbs_114_growth_someones_been_eating_their_weetabix_via_friendfeed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

