<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; anthony carroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/anthony_carroll/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK &#8216;Premium Rate&#8217; regulation is failing &#8211; Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/uk_premium_rate_regulation_is_failing_-_part_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/uk_premium_rate_regulation_is_failing_-_part_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthony carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phonepayplus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=12572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anthony Carroll, the man from the excellent FreshPlastic blog, has been championing the cause of the consumers against some of the worst abuses of the less scrupulous premium-rate operators for some time now.  WeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re delighted to bring you his storyÃ¢â‚¬Â¦. this is part 1 of a series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_smith_uk/3105682562/"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3219/3105682562_a0f07a9993_o.jpg" alt="PRS" width="208" height="240" /></a>Anthony Carroll, the man from <a href="http://freshplastic.vox.com/">the excellent FreshPlastic blog</a>, has been championing the cause of the consumers against some of the worst abuses of the less scrupulous premium-rate operators for some time now.  We&#8217;re delighted to bring you his story&#8230;. this is part 1 of a series.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Hi, I&#8217;m Anthony and I have anger issues.  Fortunately they&#8217;re focused towards those that operate premium rate SMS services (PRS) and those that regulate that industry.  I also set aside a pinch of anger towards mobile operators.  Other than that I&#8217;m generally a happy bunny.  Okay, maybe not happy Ã¢â‚¬â€œ but content.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not to like about PRS and PhonepayPlus?  Where do I begin? How about the regulator&#8217;s ridiculous name?  Who thought that was a good idea?  How did they come up with that?  Was it in-house or did they pay an agency a shedload of cash?  Either way, it&#8217;s terrible.  Do a Family Fortunes&#8217; Ã¢â‚¬Ëœwe asked 100 people&#8217; and I&#8217;d put Ã¢â‚¬ËœDouble Money&#8217; on just a handful of people knowing who they are and what they do (actually I think I&#8217;m being generous there).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s in a name anyway, as long as they do a good job, right?  Alas, they don&#8217;t excel there either.  At least if my own personal experience and observations are anything to go by&#8230;</p>
<p>Until February this year I had no reason to contact PhonepayPlus (the artist formerly known as ICSTIS).  But then one day I received a text message from Tracey (if that was her real name, which it wasn&#8217;t as Tracey isn&#8217;t real).  In her text she told me that her friend Katie (again not real) informed her that I was lots of fun and asked whether I&#8217;d like to chat.  Being single, you would think that&#8217;s the kind of text I would want to receive but, of course, neither of these ladies were real.</p>
<p>The tale tell sign that my message from Tracey wasn&#8217;t a message from a Tracey (other than a fact that I don&#8217;t know any Traceys) was what the rest of the message said: Ã¢â‚¬ËœOpt-out send STOP&#8217;, Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ£1.50/msg&#8217; and Ã¢â‚¬ËœVIP 0871789089&#8242;.  I thought nothing of it at the time as to me it was just spam.  I didn&#8217;t like it, but I wasn&#8217;t paying for it, right?  Wrong!</p>
<p>Fast forward to April and I noticed I had been charged for the message, to the tune of £1.50.  Nor was I alone, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/the-city-diary-802477.html?r=RSS">The Independent ran a piece about Spread Media</a> on the 30th March.  My operator, 3, told me that there was nothing they could do, nor did they have any responsibility when it came to the matter.  I was told to contact the spammers for a refund.  PhonepayPlus&#8217;s advice was the same&#8230;  text back Ã¢â‚¬ËœSTOP&#8217; and ring the offending company&#8217;s 0871 number for a refund.</p>
<p>I decided against ringing as, quite frankly, I didn&#8217;t trust them.  To get a refund I would have to give them my name and address.  Didn&#8217;t seem a particularly good idea, not worth it for the £1.50 owed.  They were stopped from operating PRSs shortly after, but not for long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/12/uk_premium_rate_regulation_is_failing_-_part_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

