<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; beats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/beats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter beats Reuters, AP, CNN and Sky News on Turkish Jet crash</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/twitter_beats_reuters_ap_cnn_and_sky_news_on_turkish_jet_crash.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/twitter_beats_reuters_ap_cnn_and_sky_news_on_turkish_jet_crash.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkish Jet crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=15270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIR reader Ashley Bolser sent me over this story he was reading at CNN. It describes how Twitter&#8230; &#8220;stole a march on traditional media when it was the first outlet to publish dramatic pictures of the Turkish Airlines crash&#8221; The report continues: Moments after the plane crashed at Amsterdam&#8217;s Schipol airport on Wednesday morning the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIR reader Ashley Bolser sent me over <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/02/25/twitter.amsterdam.plane.crash/">this story</a> he was reading at CNN.  It describes how Twitter&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;stole a march on traditional media when it was the first outlet to publish dramatic pictures of the Turkish Airlines crash&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The report continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>Moments after the plane crashed at Amsterdam&#8217;s Schipol airport on Wednesday morning the news was appearing on Twitter, iReport&#8217;s International Correspondent Errol Barnett said.</p></blockquote>
<p>So Twitter nailed the international mainstream media?  Again?</p>
<p>Well no.</p>
<p>Not quite.</p>
<p>SOME users of Twitter were on the ground when it happened.  One, it seems, took a picture.  One assumes that they Tweeted or Twitpic&#8217;ed the picture up to the internet.  CNN then found out about it.  Somehow.  Then CNN checked with Dutch officials and confirmed the news.  Then they took the Twitter picture &#8216;to air&#8217;.</p>
<p>This is really, really smart.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s also about a billion different flaws with the approach.</p>
<p>If I was on the scene with ZERO Twitter followers, I sent in a Twitpic called DSC0101112.jpg, you&#8217;d never know about it.</p>
<p>Not unless I gave some context in my message.  Like &#8216;plane crash in Amsterdam here is a picture:&#8217; followed by the Twitpic URL.  Or not unless I &#8216;atted&#8217; the CNN iReport team.</p>
<p>You also need to be really smart with the text used in your Tweet so that people monitoring the public Twitter search system find the stuff. I imagine the CNN social media chaps have got permanent searches going on all the time like &#8216;plane crash&#8217; and &#8216;nuclear missile&#8217; or similar.</p>
<p>But Twitter isn&#8217;t an outlet. The frontpage of Twitter has absolutely NOTHING on the Turkish Jet Crash.  So Twitter didn&#8217;t beat the Reuters photographer.  Twitter replaced the Reuters/AP photo journalist platform and enabled CNN to get hold of the images.</p>
<p>Setting aside the obvious human tragedy of today&#8217;s news, the medium and the possibilities of Twitter are getting more and more exciting.</p>
<p>At some point I will be there when Paris Hilton falls out of a nightclub with Prince William, both naked, both kissing passionately and both holding previously unreleased Nokia N98 16 megapixel mobile handsets.  And I will have my N95 8GB there, fully charged, with my 3G+ Vodafone data network poised to take my pixels to <a href="http://www.shozu.com">ShoZu</a> and from thence to the world.</p>
<p>Have a read of the CNN story <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/02/25/twitter.amsterdam.plane.crash/">here</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m experiencing a renaissance in &#8216;value&#8217; for mainstream media.  I can&#8217;t be bothered to read through every single public twitter message and piece together what happened.  Instead I&#8217;ll leave it to a journalist (or should that be &#8216;social network analyst?) to do the research and knock it together into a decent commentary that I can consume.  I value that.  Standby, I&#8217;m willing to bet The London Times will have an overview online in a few hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/02/twitter_beats_reuters_ap_cnn_and_sky_news_on_turkish_jet_crash.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

