<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; boss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/boss/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does your boss own your text messages?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/does_your_boss_own_your_text_messages.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/does_your_boss_own_your_text_messages.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text Message]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your boss pays your mobile phone bill, does he have a right to read your text messages? According to an LA court, the answer is no &#8211; not without the employee&#8217;s consent. The decision comes as part of a case, reported by the LA Times that saw a policeman take his employer to court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your boss pays your mobile phone bill, does he have a right to read your text messages? According to an LA court, the answer is no &#8211; not without the employee&#8217;s consent. </p>
<p>The decision comes as part of a case, reported by the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-me-text19-2008jun19,0,933444.story">LA Times</a> that saw a policeman take his employer to court after police department staff read his text messages. </p>
<p>After the policeman exceeded the monthly text allowance paid for by his employer, the police department asked its service provider to turn over records of the contents of his messages. </p>
<p>Wrong move, said the judge, who decided the service provider had breached federal Stored Communications Act, and that the text messages were covered by the 4th amendment. In short, the employer didn&#8217;t have a right to look at the texts without the employee&#8217;s say so, or without a policy in place warning staff their messages were being monitored. </p>
<p>Does anyone know what laws apply here in the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/06/does_your_boss_own_your_text_messages.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung boss quits</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/samsung_boss_quits.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/samsung_boss_quits.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the Motorola fiasco, it looks like it&#8217;s Samsung&#8217;s turn to start making headlines for all the wrong reasons. Head of Samsung, Lee Kun-hee, has resigned from his post after being charged with tax evasion last week, alongside a number of other executives. Other high-ranking Samsung staffters have also handed in their resignations, including the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the Motorola fiasco, it looks like it&#8217;s Samsung&#8217;s turn to start making headlines for all the wrong reasons. Head of Samsung, Lee Kun-hee, has resigned from his post after being charged with tax evasion last week, alongside a number of other executives. Other high-ranking Samsung staffters have also handed in their resignations, including the boss&#8217; son.</p>
<p>Lee Kun-hee has been at the head of Samsung for over 20 years now, so there&#8217;s no underestimating how big this is for the company. That said, if local press reports are anything to go by, it looks like Lee won&#8217;t be relinquishing his hold on the company just yet: according to <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/22/business/samsung.php">The International Herald Tribune</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>But there was little doubt among many observers about the Lee family&#8217;s ability to continue controlling Samsung. The family runs the conglomerates through a network of loyal executives and circular financing that locks the subsidiaries to each other.</p></blockquote>
<p>Plus ca change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/samsung_boss_quits.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

