Posts Tagged ‘customer services’

Andrew Scott on The Curious Case of Johan Nordström

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

In 1901 a Swedish immigrant to America called Johan Nordstrom, founded the Nordstrom department store. In 1975, by now a national chain, a Nordstrom customer walked into one of their stores to return a set of tyres he’d bought. The salesperson gladly took back the set of car tyres and gave the customer a refund. Nothing weird about that, right? Except Nordstrom has never sold tyres.

Many of you may have heard this story before; its one of many legendary tales of great customer service from Nordstrom and best of all it’s true.

According to a chap called Efraim Turban, “Customer service is a series of activities designed to enhance the level of customer satisfaction – that is, the feeling that a product or service has met the customer expectation.”

Like us all I have copious tales of woe and despair dealing with the corporate giants of today. I’d say the worst offenders used to be the banks,  but in today’s world of mobile everything, the network operators have definitely taken that crown. While complaining about OFCOM and whining about infrastructure costs, mobile operators continue to fleece consumers while delivering a deeply inconsistent customer service experience which can drive grown men of good demeanour to the edge of sanity. I’m a grown man.

I’ve had a mobile phone for over 15 years. I’ve been with o2 for a decade. In November 2008 I upgraded my Blackberry. As part of that deal I haggled a free USB Broadband Modem for my laptop, with the usual £15 monthly cost INCLUDED as part of my £45 tariff.

Now, I have enough material to write 20,000 words on the events of the past 9 months; but suffice to say 20+ calls, 10hrs+ on the phone, copious emails and tweets later, I’m still left without a USB Modem and o2 refusing to honour the agreed deal. An o2 Manager – having listened to the recorded call from November-has even confirmed the deal was agreed; but still nothing happened and I went around in circles again. In short, it leaves loyal customers like myself feeling that O2 don’t give a f***.

I cannot find the words to describe how fundamentally angry I am with o2. I have wasted an extraordinary amount of time. I spend £5,000 a year on my personal Blackberry and that’s before counting the 6 contracts of my staff.

In fact I was so angry I found myself typing “I hate o2″ into Google. As a general search it gave 56,000,000 results; being a nice chap I thought I’d do an explicit search instead. Sadly Orange and 3 escape this test, for obvious reasons. Lucky them.

I hate. I love. For every hater, X love you
O2 416 767* 1.8
Telefonica 4,960 404 0.08
Vodafone 726 403 .5
T-Mobile 1,130 2,810 2.4

It’s all rather haphazard of course; for starters, 9 out of 10 of the 767 people saying “I love o2″ were not talking about o2 the operator, but o2 Yoga, o2 Fitness and a plethora of other things which were definitely not telco.

I know many people who only use o2 because they wanted an iPhone; but they despise o2. That’s so wrong! How can a brand get it SO badly wrong?

o2 have done a great job of turning around their initial brand perception, using music venues & spending millions on “being cool”. This is all then wasted when the service doesn’t deliver straightforward satisfaction to a customer.

Brands must learn I simply want a most basic level of respect and politeness. Calls returned when promised, honour the deal you agreed to, a  little bit of trust might even be nice. I don’t care whether I’m a “VIP UK Select Gold” customer (as the nauseatingly precious voice tells me every time I call). It’s all smoke and mirrors.

If o2 focused back on delivering a basic level of good service to all customers, churn would lower, brand value would rise and shareholder coffers would fill.

As anyone in business knows, there are many tombs written on the subject of customer service; blogs, podcasts, qualifications, training camps,  methodologies and of course the inevitable slew of government supported “standards” with customer friendly titles such as “TICSS” and “ISO 10002:2004″ Did you know, that last one addresses “the quality management on handling of customer complaints”?

Fascinating. :-)

Actually, IMHO (lets keep the acronym theme going) this is all a load of crap. I’m with Johan. Good customer service is really rather simple. Until very recently Nordstrom staff when joining were given only one thing: a card with just 75 words written on it, the core of which said “Our number one goal is to provide outstanding customer service.

Nordstrom Rules:

Rule #1: Use good judgment in all situations. There will be no additional rules.”

As modern health & safety madness and litigation has got worse, that same card is now accompanied with an employee handbook, but this simple guidance and wise employee empowerment remains.

Frustratingly, many of the people I work with in the industry are from o2; and they are good people doing good things; but they’re not dealing with the day to day service. I only have a modest 1,000+ twitter followers and I probably meet 1000 mobile industry people a year; I’m no head of a Global FTSE 100 bluechip, but if they won’t listen to an angry mobile entrepreneur what hope does John Doe have?

It is truly incomprehensible how mobile operators can deliver such a widespread poor level of customer service. Corporate culture and brand values start at the top, and if any o2 shareholder is reading this, that is where you should look to solve this endemic problem.

I wonder if o2 is ISO 10002:2004 approved..? Actually I don’t care. I’m a customer. I don’t care. It makes no difference to me. Just serve me well. I’m your customer and I’m the reason company exists! Johan Nordström knew that.

At the end of my last post I said I’d write next time on the subject “It’s about the data, stupid.” Well, in terms of delivering valuable functionality to users that remains true, but in terms of your brand and business it’s all about the customer, always.

- – - – -

Andrew Scott is a digital entrepreneur in London, CEO Rummble, Non-exec UnLtdWorld.com, Founding board m.Love & lover of all things mobile!

Follow Andrew on Twitter: andrewjscott.

Is it official then, there’s an Orange Response CS team for online?

Monday, September 1st, 2008

It certainly looks like Orange have begun extending their Orange Response customer services assistance to the internet with comments posted like these:

Hi there,

I work for Orange and have checked this for you, and you should not be paying VAT on your final figure.

If you want to drop me an email with your contact details I will give you a call. Send the email to ‘customer.services at orange.co.uk’ with the subject ‘Jonathon Orange Response’ and your details should be passed to me.

Thanks,

Jonathon

Orange Response

This bodes well.

Orange is “committed to providing excellent customer service”

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

Here’s a tale of woe from Miss Charlie Waldren a semi regular reader here at Mobile Industry Review. Alas, Orange don’t have anything like Vodafone’s Forum Intervention Team so she is, I suspect, destined to roam the land without a response or a resolution.

Have a read:

- – - – -

Orange is “committed to providing excellent customer service”.

This is what their hold music tells me, but I’m afraid I am becoming ever inclined to disagree.

I’ve had a phone with Orange for just over two years now. The contract (originally in my mum’s name, with me paying the bills) was upgraded in December.

I chose the Nokia 6500 slide, after a fair bit of consideration. Now, I like this phone. It’s sleek, has a decent sized keypad, nice user interface, is 3G which makes email on the go nice and quick, and has an expandable memory. Unfortunately, it also crashes. It does this a lot, and often to the extent that the only way of resolving the problem is to remove the battery and switch the phone back on.

Now, this appears to be a long running fault with this phone. I got a replacement, which did the same. In fact, between Christmas, and up until a few weeks ago, I had had FOUR of these phones, all with the same problem.

This is my only phone, so it’s pretty important to me to have one which works reliably – so in a fit of frustration I called Orange yet again to find out what could be done.

I was finally offered a Different Model Replacement (DMR). However, I wasn’t allowed to choose which phone I could replace it with. The only options were the Nokia 6500 classic, Samsung U600, or Samsung G600. The 6500 doesn’t have expandable memory, and neither of the Samsungs were 3G, so in spite of Orange’s insistence I was being offered a replacement of the same specification to the phone I had, I really wasn’t. Was there any way around this? Would I be able to actually choose a phone which suited my needs? No.

So, I was stuck between a rock and a hard place. Keep a phone which doesn’t work (but at least suited my needs on paper), or take a replacement which I had not chosen and did not like in order to have a working handset. In the end, my frustration with the 6500 slide became so great I felt forced to take the replacement, and so opted for the Nokia, as I felt this was the nearest match to my requirements.

I was assured that the phone being sent to me would be a brand new handset, and not a refurb. Yet again, I was let down by Orange, lied to in fact, and found myself issued with a refurbished phone. I called them, and asked to speak to the supervisor I had been dealing with, and on three separate occasions was promised a call-back, and never received one.

The phone I was sent is faulty. The fascia casing does not fit properly, the camera does not work, and there is a dent on the back. I called Orange, again, to try and talk to someone about this, and explain my ever growing frustration at what I felt was a real lack of help. I was told that the best they could do would be to issue me with another 6500 classic. If I wanted a different phone, I would have to wait until I have had a number of those handsets again, and then be offered another DMR. Yes, I have to have the same bad handset again, and then another or three or four of them to finally be offered a replacement – which Orange will choose.

Given that the phone which was originally issued under my contract was faulty, and that every replacement following it has had a problem as well, and I am still not being offered a satisfactory solution to the problem, I would like nothing more than to be able to walk away from Orange. But again, they have my hands tied – I am only 6 months into an 18 month contract, and to get out of it I would have to buy my way out, which at a year’s worth of £30 a month line rental is not a viable option. I was, at one point, offered an early upgrade as a way of at least getting a handset which suited me, but at an early upgrade fee of at least £300, again, this is not an option. The contract is now in my name, but even this appears to make no difference.

It seems strange to me that Orange do not even have some kind of Intervention Team, or a department that actually cares enough about customer retention and satisfaction enough to help me. Right now, I would settle for a nice, working, reliable phone of my choosing – and an admission that the service I have received had been less than satisfactory. If I were a new customer, I would have the pick of the playing field. Why, as a long-standing, loyal member, am I then left out in the cold like this? Do we not matter once we have signed the paper to agree to send them money each month?

So, to the Orange complaints department; here is your challenge. This article is now out in the world for everyone to see – and how you help me will, I am sure, influence plenty of people’s decision about whether to become your customer or not.

- – - – -

If you wanted living proof of Orange’s challenge with Customer Services, there it is. Charlie, cut your losses. Go to Vodafone.


Powered by Interactive Energy | Sign up to The Application Review newsletter