<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; data bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/data_bill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Orange data bill: £178 &#8211;&gt; £10</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/orange_data_bill_178_--_10.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/orange_data_bill_178_--_10.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=11725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, if you&#8217;re in the middle of getting nailed by Orange for your data usage, do talk to Orange. A MIR reader had the following issue. He thought he was on the £1.50 per day, unlimited data usage tariff. But, er, no. Call it a billing issue. A feature. Or whatever you like. He was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if you&#8217;re in the middle of getting nailed by Orange for your data usage, do talk to Orange.</p>
<p>A MIR reader had the following issue.  He thought he was on the £1.50 per day, unlimited data usage tariff.</p>
<p>But, er, no.</p>
<p>Call it a billing issue. A feature. Or whatever you like.  He was actually hit for £3/megabyte &#8216;data overage&#8217; fees.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was just watching a few Youtube videos,&#8221; the reader tells me.  When pressed, he explained he was watching <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGGTfuM1RGM&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=E16B78DAB5EAC98E&amp;index=7">TorchWool</a>.  As you do.</p>
<p>The reader&#8217;s mistake? Using his &#8216;friends and family&#8217; civilian device on Orange.  If he&#8217;d used 3, he&#8217;d have been perfectly fine.</p>
<p>As it happens, Orange whacked him with a stupendous 178 pounds (inc VAT) bill.  Which was swiftly reduced after a few conversations with various customer service executives at Orange.  They swapped him, retrospectively, to their £1.50/day unlimited usage deal.</p>
<p>This makes sense. Satisfied the customer. Revenue for Orange.  And I don&#8217;t have to write another How-Shit-Is-Orange post.  So everyone&#8217;s a winner.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re caught by this, do bear the above example in mind.  When you talk to Orange, stay polite &#8212; be reasonable &#8212; and remind them that £3/meg overage charge is rather a lot compared to their equivalent 3p/meg with their £1.50/day &#8216;unlimited&#8217; offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/11/orange_data_bill_178_--_10.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

