<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; flaiming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/flaiming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mr Operator on T-Mobile/Android &#8212; A flaiming pile of mediocrity</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/mr_operator_on_t-mobileandroid_--_a_flaiming_pile_of_mediocrity.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/mr_operator_on_t-mobileandroid_--_a_flaiming_pile_of_mediocrity.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flaiming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediocrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr Operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile/Android]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=9632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got this missive from our very own friendly industry giant, Mr Operator. He&#8217;s been glued to the Android coverage and isn&#8217;t entirely impressed. Here we go: - &#8211; - &#8211; - Having watched the launch video, first impression (apart from that T-Mobile &#38; Google can&#8217;t organise a decent handset release to save themselves): [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got this missive from our very own friendly industry giant, Mr Operator.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been glued to the Android coverage and isn&#8217;t entirely impressed.</p>
<p>Here we go:</p>
<p>- &#8211; - &#8211; -</p>
<p>Having watched the launch video, first impression (apart from that T-Mobile &amp; Google can&#8217;t organise a decent handset release to save themselves):</p>
<p>Poor man&#8217;s iPhone.</p>
<p><strong>2nd impression</strong>: They have not delivered the second coming of the Jesus phone &#8211; although with all the evangelising you&#8217;d think they had just solved world hunger.</p>
<p><strong>3rd impression</strong>: The apps are just lame. Nothing worth changing MNO for. The slider and look of it does not stand out at all.</p>
<p><strong>4th: Hardware</strong>: This isn&#8217;t a self-explanatory aspirational device like the iPhone or N95, it could be any QWERTY slider.</p>
<p>No tethering! How dare you use it like you want to.</p>
<p>No MS Exchange support &#8211; forget those business users for now.</p>
<p>Push G-mail only. Again, forget business users.</p>
<p>No Stereo Bluetooth &lt;8o=</p>
<p>Gtalk IM presence in the phonebook &#8211; nice. Finally something new.</p>
<p>$179 is very subsidised. Hmmmmm&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>WTF were the geeks doing up there, talking about modding their phones?</p>
<p>Overall&#8230;..a flaming pile of mediocrity. Let&#8217;s revisit in a year.</p>
<p>- &#8211; - &#8211; -</p>
<p>Oh dear.  Oh dear me.  It can&#8217;t be all bad though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/mr_operator_on_t-mobileandroid_--_a_flaiming_pile_of_mediocrity.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

