<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; in the works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/in_the_works/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone Nano &#8216;in the works&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in the works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/?p=13474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a Tweet via Mike Butcher about the iPhone Nano. The author of the post on eetimes cites &#8216;various reports&#8217; but doesn&#8217;t define them. I&#8217;ve heard a lot about the Nano and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing the fruits of Apple&#8217;s labour. I&#8217;ve been highly frustrated with the fact that the iPhone is completely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a Tweet <a href="http://twitter.com/mbites">via Mike Butcher</a> about the iPhone Nano.  The author of the <a href="http://eetimes.eu/uk/212900039">post on eetimes</a> cites &#8216;various reports&#8217; but doesn&#8217;t define them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard a lot about the Nano and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing the fruits of Apple&#8217;s labour.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been highly frustrated with the fact that the iPhone is completely 100% out of the league of most normobs.  In fact, the anecdotal research I&#8217;ve been doing recently is pretty horrific with the summary being:</p>
<blockquote><p>Love the iPhone. Won&#8217;t even consider it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Instead, the majority of PAYG users I spoke with are thinking very carefully about spending £19 on a handset, let alone £299 for the iPhone 3G.</p>
<p>An iPhone Nano &#8212; with iTunes, a few gig of storage and a £99 followed by £49 price tag&#8230;</p>
<p>Is that possible?</p>
<p>I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2009/01/iphone_nano_in_the_works.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint&#8217;s got an Android handset in the works</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/sprints_got_an_android_handset_in_the_works.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/sprints_got_an_android_handset_in_the_works.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in the works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=9439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a note from MatthÃƒÂ¤us over at VentureBeat. He pointed me to a post they made yesterday regarding reports that Sprint is working on an Android phone. Eric, the author, goes on to answer the &#8216;mass market&#8217; issue we talked about yesterday. Our man at the Google Developer Conference wasn&#8217;t entirely sold on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a note from MatthÃƒÂ¤us over at VentureBeat.  He pointed me to a post they made yesterday regarding reports that <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/09/16/first-android-phone-to-hit-stores-on-oct-17-sprint-android-phone-coming-next-year/">Sprint is working on an Android phone</a>.</p>
<p>Eric, the author, goes on to answer the &#8216;mass market&#8217; issue <a href="http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/09/google_lacking_mass_market_strategy_for_android.html">we talked about yesterday</a>.  Our man at the Google Developer Conference wasn&#8217;t entirely sold on the incentive to push mobile operators to adopt Android handsets.  Eric points out that the idea behind Android is that operators should do their own front-ends, or their own &#8216;frosting of the cake&#8217;, as Eric put it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s definitely one strategy.  It certainly depends on the entrepreneurial vision of the operator.</p>
<p>The HTC Dream is apparently set to go live on the 23rd of September at an NY press conference; and it should hit stores by mid October (17th or thereabouts).</p>
<p>Interesting, interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/sprints_got_an_android_handset_in_the_works.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

