<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Industry Review &#187; insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/tag/insurance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com</link>
	<description>Daily news and opinion for 250,000 industry executives and mobile fanatics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Carphone Warehouse Lifeline Insurance: Total Rubbish</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/carphone_warehouse_liveline_insurance_total_rubbish.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/carphone_warehouse_liveline_insurance_total_rubbish.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Rubbish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=9349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ordered my iPhone 3G from UK mobile retailer, Carphone Warehouse, if you recall.
During the order I was asked if I&#8217;d like some insurance (Ã‚Â£12/month).  I thought that was pretty steep (12 x 18 months = 216 pounds!) but the chap reckoned it was a good idea (&#8220;it&#8217;s an expensive device&#8221;) and I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered my iPhone 3G from UK mobile retailer, Carphone Warehouse, if you recall.</p>
<p>During the order I was asked if I&#8217;d like some insurance (Ã‚Â£12/month).  I thought that was pretty steep (12 x 18 months = 216 pounds!) but the chap reckoned it was a good idea (&#8220;it&#8217;s an expensive device&#8221;) and I was in a positive mood in respect to Carphone Warehouse.</p>
<p>I promptly lost my iPhone one Sunday a few weeks after I got it.</p>
<p>No biggie.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got insurance.  I&#8217;ve got a &#8216;lifeline&#8217;.</p>
<p>I called o2 and put on the bar immediately.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s begin the shit.  And let&#8217;s be clear, it is 100% total shit.</p>
<p>It is a total, total 100% bollocks process.</p>
<p>You phone up the lifeline team.</p>
<p>They then do their best to wind you up.</p>
<p>There is a REASON I agreed to pay stupid amounts of money per month.  The point being, if I *DO* lose my phone, I want it replaced next day.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how it works if you have insurance with Vodafone, right?</p>
<p>The customer services folk get one sent out to you next day.  There&#8217;s an admin charge &#8212; Ã‚Â£35 or similar.  But the handset arrives next day.</p>
<p>With Carphone&#8217;s Lifeline rubbish, they make you jump through hoop after hoop after hoop.</p>
<p>You need a crime number.  Even though you&#8217;ve lost it.  You have to phone the Police and report it lost.  Formally.</p>
<p>Only, living in Essex, the Police don&#8217;t bother with anything associated with mobile handsets.  It took up too much bureaucracy.  So you can&#8217;t get a crime number.</p>
<p>Insert lots of bollocking around with the Carphone Lifeline team.</p>
<p>&#8220;You need a crime number.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No I don&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes you do. Call us back when you have it.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Essex Police don&#8217;t issue crime numbers.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh.  Oh yeah..&#8221;</p>
<p>Total bollocks.</p>
<p>Eventually I walked into a Carphone Warehouse and did the insurance request manually.</p>
<p>I expected to be able to walk out with a new iPhone 3G a few minutes afterwards.</p>
<p>Only, my &#8216;claim&#8217; was &#8216;referred&#8217;.</p>
<p>I phoned up the next day.  No news.</p>
<p>&#8216;We&#8217;ll notify you as to your claim status in due course, in writing, Sir.&#8217;</p>
<p>Claim status?  I lost it.  I LOST the phone.  Send me a new one.  That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m paying for.</p>
<p>There is no claim status.  There shouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the sodding point in paying 12 quid A MONTH if, when you lose your phone, they have to &#8216;think&#8217; about it and make an &#8216;estimation&#8217;?</p>
<p>I got the notification.</p>
<p>Unsuccessful.</p>
<p>You should see the utter drivel Carphone&#8217;s Insurance people are shipping out to customers these days.</p>
<p>The letter says words to the effect of &#8216;your claim has been unsuccessful&#8217;.</p>
<p>The intent behind it?  Please flock off.  Flock off and give us your money.</p>
<p>Wait &#8217;til you see the letter. It is SHOCKINGLY bad form.</p>
<p>Shocking.</p>
<p>The o2 customer services chap laughed at me when I told him I was paying Ã‚Â£12 a month for insurance, explaining it&#8217;s about Ã‚Â£6 with them.  Gahh.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe Mr Dustone and the Carphone Warehouse lot can look anyone in the face with this kind of behaviour.</p>
<p>They have to make money.  I don&#8217;t begrudge them that.  They&#8217;re in business to make cash.</p>
<p>But the policy of writing back to me and telling me to flock off and see their terms and conditions&#8230; they&#8217;re hoping I just resign myself to not bothering to follow up.</p>
<p>Obviously I can continue discussions with them.  I can write letters.  I can ask them to reconsider.  After 5 or 6 letters and the obligatory &#8216;Dear Mr Dunstone&#8217; bollocks, I&#8217;m sure I could set them straight.</p>
<p>But can I be bothered?</p>
<p>No.  It&#8217;s an inefficient use of my time and resources to arse about with their insurance provider.</p>
<p>However I can bring Mobile Industry Review&#8217;s considerable guns to bear to suggest that no one else suffers.</p>
<p>So today begins the Carphone Warehouse Lifeline Insurance Is Useless campaign.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still working out exactly how I will manifest this.</p>
<p>1. I&#8217;m off to buy a new iPhone from o2.<br />
2. I&#8217;m going to cancel my Lifeline insurance.  What a piece of shit that is.<br />
3. I&#8217;d appreciate your suggestions on how to manifest a campaign against the lifeline insurance.  A banner ad?  Maybe a news spot in the MIR Show?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the letter:<br />
<a title="lifeline by smstextnews, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/smstextnews/2859308571/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3049/2859308571_7dc77936bb.jpg" alt="lifeline" width="458" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Pay close attention to the second paragraph:</p>
<blockquote><p>According to your claim, you reported the incident to your service provider on 24 August 2008. However when I contacted them, I was told they were notified of the incident on 18th August 2008.</p>
<p>Please refer to your policy wording for specific information.</p></blockquote>
<p>You what?  That&#8217;s all the explanation I get, is it?</p>
<p>This is total rubbish.</p>
<p>I did some thinking and I had a look at the calendar.  I think I know what&#8217;s gone wrong &#8212; the lady who processed my claim at Carphone Warehouse has put in the wrong date &#8212; leading to the inconsistency.</p>
<p>But if I phone up now and start writing letters, you know what they&#8217;ll do.  Deny, deny, deny.</p>
<p>My mistake.</p>
<p>My mistake doing business with Carphone Warehouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/09/carphone_warehouse_liveline_insurance_total_rubbish.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More expensive insurance for drivers who use mobiles</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/more_expensive_insurance_for_drivers_who_use_mobiles.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/more_expensive_insurance_for_drivers_who_use_mobiles.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allianz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smstextnews.com/?p=6167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drivers who are caught using a mobile phone behind the wheel will not only find themselves on the business end of a fine from the police, but now they&#8217;ll also be penalised by their insurer too.
Allianz Insurance has announced that it&#8217;s putting up insurance premiums for motorists with a convinction for driving whilst using a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drivers who are caught using a mobile phone behind the wheel will not only find themselves on the business end of a fine from the police, but now they&#8217;ll also be penalised by their insurer too.</p>
<p>Allianz Insurance has announced that it&#8217;s putting up insurance premiums for motorists with a convinction for driving whilst using a mobile by 30 percent, in the same way it would for people who had been convicted of careless driving.</p>
<p>Another step in the right direction to make sure people get the message about going hands-free when they&#8217;re driving. Presumably <a href="http://www.smstextnews.com/2008/03/jeremy_clarkson_-_driving_while_under_the_influence_of_a_mobile.html">Jeremy Clarkson is looking for a new insurer</a> nowâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/more_expensive_insurance_for_drivers_who_use_mobiles.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
